Smoking Cost

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • precious007
    Banned Users
    • Sep 2010
    • 5885

    #1

    Smoking Cost

    Did you guys (ex-smokers) have ever calculated how much you've spend on cigarettes in your life time as smokers, it's pretty funny.... assuming most of the people that only smoked for 10 or 20 years have spent a fortune ......

    I've been on a pack of cigarretes since I was 13 or so ... yeah .... at 12 got hooked but started buying/smoking a pack at 13... it's roughly 13 years and a half since then... and quit for nearly 3 months...

    Days = 4930 x $4.5 (average cost per pack - actual price) = $22.185

    LoL ... I can't believe it honestly .... that kind of money can buy me a BMW 3 SERIES cash, lol or you can buy a brand new flat (one room) .... in a decent area....

    Wholly crap.... a life time smoker spends on average $100,000 on cigarettes which is quite a lot of money that I bet not many have on their hands ...... ($100,000 if you're a pack a day smoker here in Romania, probably it would been double if you lived in Norway, US, Bermuda, Sweden and so on ...

    $200,000 .... is a nice villa anywhere in the world lol
  • WickedKitchen
    Member
    • Nov 2009
    • 2528

    #2
    When I started smoking Camel cigarettes they were 99 cents on special. I think they were $1.50 normally. At the end they were approaching $7.00 per pack. I smoked the damned things for 15 years at about a pack a day. Let's say the average was $4.00 that would be $21,900. Of which I would have had to make about 30K to pay for them. That's about what I made at my first job out of college. A whole year's pay up in smoke. Huh.

    Prolly have snus down to $1.5/day but that's with the pre-pact stuff of which I still have about 80 cans. Read the entire making snus at home thread too. Gonna make an attempt in the spring I think.

    Comment

    • Darwin
      Member
      • Mar 2010
      • 1372

      #3
      I assume you meant $22,185 but I am skeptical that anyone anywhere can by a new BMW 3 series for that amount. It would be well over twice that in the U.S. You're absolutely right though about the long term costs.

      Comment

      • precious007
        Banned Users
        • Sep 2010
        • 5885

        #4
        Originally posted by Darwin View Post
        I assume you meant $22,185 but I am skeptical that anyone anywhere can by a new BMW 3 series for that amount. It would be well over twice that in the U.S. You're absolutely right though about the long term costs.
        hey, yeah not a new one, but just like a brand new one ;-)

        Snus for a change is a lot cheaper......... I've consumed 80 cans in 6 months... so far.... dip and snus....

        That would be roughly ... $600 .... and I'm trying to cut down to a can every 5 days...

        Comment

        • Veganpunk
          Member
          • Jun 2009
          • 5382

          #5
          I haven't calculated it up, but I know when I made the switch to snus, my paychecks started getting a lot fatter. (This was before PACT) Today I shopped around to buy a roll of Click. It's about $50.00 no matter where I buy it. Really sucks.

          Comment

          • khalid
            Member
            • Aug 2010
            • 348

            #6
            I smoked hand rolling tobacco and was able to buy it tax free in bulk. It costs me more to use snus.

            Comment

            • Jwalker
              Member
              • May 2010
              • 1067

              #7
              It would would be cheaper for me to smoke than use snus actually. ryo tobacco labelled as pipe tobacco which is what I mostly smoked is about 20 bucks a pound which is enough to make probably 600 cigarettes and tubes are three bucks for 200 so at one pack a day that would be 30 bucks a month or so or about 420 dollars. Snus and dip is in a worst case scenario 4-5 dollars a can on average for me and I use about half a can a day on average (It's slightly less but for simplicity) so 15 cans a month at 4 dollars a can is 60 dollars or about 750 a year. It could go up at five dollars a can to 75 dollars a month or almost 1,000 dollars a year. I also spend money on pipe tobacco and cigars so that's another cost I think I average about 1,000 dollars a year which is really high for me. The comparison is stupid though since I can't smoke even half a pack on campus without disciplinary problems since tobacco use is banned.

              Edit: I don't feel like smoking cigarettes anyway so it doesn't really matter they could be free and I wouldn't care what the comparison cost was.

              Comment

              • precious007
                Banned Users
                • Sep 2010
                • 5885

                #8
                Originally posted by Jwalker View Post
                It would would be cheaper for me to smoke than use snus actually. ryo tobacco labelled as pipe tobacco which is what I mostly smoked is about 20 bucks a pound which is enough to make probably 600 cigarettes and tubes are three bucks for 200 so at one pack a day that would be 30 bucks a month or so or about 420 dollars. Snus and dip is in a worst case scenario 4-5 dollars a can on average for me and I use about half a can a day on average (It's slightly less but for simplicity) so 15 cans a month at 4 dollars a can is 60 dollars or about 750 a year. It could go up at five dollars a can to 75 dollars a month or almost 1,000 dollars a year. I also spend money on pipe tobacco and cigars so that's another cost I think I average about 1,000 dollars a year which is really high for me. The comparison is stupid though since I can't smoke even half a pack on campus without disciplinary problems since tobacco use is banned.

                Edit: I don't feel like smoking cigarettes anyway so it doesn't really matter they could be free and I wouldn't care what the comparison cost was.
                yeah but still most smokers are cigarette smokers, and so was I ....

                rolling tobacco, pipes, cigars and so on are for the elder

                you can't walk out as a 20 year older` with a pipe stuck in your lips, lol

                Comment

                • TommyGunBC
                  Member
                  • Sep 2010
                  • 268

                  #9
                  Wow $200000 wouldn't even buy a run down house in my area , wow the rest of the world is sure cheaper than North America

                  Comment

                  • BradenL
                    Member
                    • Dec 2010
                    • 187

                    #10
                    In the US 200k would not really get you that far in the housing market, although since it crashed 2008 you could probably buy something WAY below market value if you really wanted it. My brother worked in real estate for a time and right now you could actually purchase a small/semi-crappy house for 200k...not that I would want to though haha

                    Comment

                    • precious007
                      Banned Users
                      • Sep 2010
                      • 5885

                      #11
                      Originally posted by TommyGunBC View Post
                      Wow $200000 wouldn't even buy a run down house in my area , wow the rest of the world is sure cheaper than North America
                      lol, I love it how some people like to inflate the prices without even checking/doing a research before......

                      Dude, quite a luxurious house in Vancouver, I'm talking 3 bedrooms, 814 sq .... build in 1990 is $299,000 ...

                      what are you talking about?

                      In the US 200k would not really get you that far in the housing market, although since it crashed 2008 you could probably buy something WAY below market value if you really wanted it. My brother worked in real estate for a time and right now you could actually purchase a small/semi-crappy house for 200k...not that I would want to though haha
                      Are you nuts?

                      Here's one in Orlando, 3 Bedrooms, 1146 sq, garage .......

                      just saying....

                      there's dozens of other examples....

                      I like this one http://www.property4peanuts.com/prop...n-usa-233.html

                      It says area Detroit? ... where is that?! I thought Detroit is in canada not in US..

                      Comment

                      • internope
                        Member
                        • Oct 2010
                        • 215

                        #12
                        Originally posted by precious007 View Post
                        lol, I love it how some people like to inflate the prices without even checking/doing a research before......

                        Dude, quite a luxurious house in Vancouver, I'm talking 3 bedrooms, 814 sq .... build in 1990 is $299,000 ...

                        what are you talking about?



                        Are you nuts?

                        Here's one in Orlando, 3 Bedrooms, 1146 sq, garage .......

                        just saying....

                        there's dozens of other examples....

                        I like this one http://www.property4peanuts.com/prop...n-usa-233.html

                        It says area Detroit? ... where is that?! I thought Detroit is in canada not in US..

                        The example in Vancouver is a condominium, not a house, and comes with $269 CDN/month condo fees. The $299K + 269/month buys you an apartment, but Vancouver is one of the nicest cities in North America.

                        In the USA, if you want a very basic 2 or 3 bedroom home near a metropolitan area with a decent quality of life and where there are some job prospects left (not Detroit or Orlando!) you are looking at spending around $200k.

                        Comment

                        • WickedKitchen
                          Member
                          • Nov 2009
                          • 2528

                          #13
                          Interlope is right. 200k is pretty cheap for a house near a city. For that price you'll get something that's termed a "handyman special". I bought one of those once. Good thing I was handy 'cos we made a bundle off of it in the end but the first two years there were terrible.

                          You could buy a house in Mastic, Long Island for like 10K. Not kidding. You certainly wouldn't want to live there. I'd bet it's worse than Detroit. There are places like that everywhere. At the end of the day it's all relative. You get what you pay for.

                          Comment

                          Related Topics

                          Collapse

                          Working...
                          X