Portion users like myself will still get fleshlighted... And not in a good way.
So because I buy cans that weigh less than 1.2 oz. I get to pay more in taxes. This feels like a direct attack on portion snus from the American tobacco lobby...
WI Tax Changes On Smokeless Tobacco Products
Originally printed at http://www.northlandsnewscenter.com/...123112873.html
By KBJR News 1
June 3, 2011
Duluth, MN (Northland's News Center) - A major change to the Wisconsin tax structure on some smokeless tobacco products is on the horizon.
The Joint Finance Committee approved a provision put forth by Altria Clients Services, the parent company of tobacco giant Philip Morris, that would tax moist snuff, also called chewing tobacco, by weight, not a percentage of what it costs distributors.
Tobacco would be taxed at a rate of a dollar–seventy–six per ounce....or two dollars and eleven cents if it weighed less than one–point–two ounces.
U.S. smokeless tobacco is the largest producer of moist snuff...and includes the brands Copenhagen and Skoal.
Opponents of the effort say switching to a weight–based tax would steer more minors toward tobacco because products would be cheaper for consumers.
Originally printed at http://www.northlandsnewscenter.com/...123112873.html
By KBJR News 1
June 3, 2011
Duluth, MN (Northland's News Center) - A major change to the Wisconsin tax structure on some smokeless tobacco products is on the horizon.
The Joint Finance Committee approved a provision put forth by Altria Clients Services, the parent company of tobacco giant Philip Morris, that would tax moist snuff, also called chewing tobacco, by weight, not a percentage of what it costs distributors.
Tobacco would be taxed at a rate of a dollar–seventy–six per ounce....or two dollars and eleven cents if it weighed less than one–point–two ounces.
U.S. smokeless tobacco is the largest producer of moist snuff...and includes the brands Copenhagen and Skoal.
Opponents of the effort say switching to a weight–based tax would steer more minors toward tobacco because products would be cheaper for consumers.
Comment