Originally posted by Andy105
View Post
Thanks for sharing the Article. Larry does a good job reporting on the issues.
It seems SM is still in the game.......I still give the odds at 30/70......
I also would be hesitant to read correlation into a mere series of events.........i.e. that releasing certain members from the FDA committee is somehow correlated (or reflects upon) how the FDA will think through SM's request.........there are too many other possible causal explanations (like there actually was a conflict of interest, that actually did hinder the FDA's operations in court, and that the nature of the conflict (pro or anti- tobacco) played no factor in the decision.......the conflict of interest not the content of interest was the grounds for their release)....Thus I would be hesitant to draw indication of sweeping changes in ideology from a mere temporal sequence of unrelated events.
Anyway...........it is good news........and even if the request is finally denied.......I think it has done its job.........It has weakened (or exposed the weakness) of the Anti-tobacco position.......and.....it has succeeded in making the topic of Harm Reduction Products a serious one
Comment