Mars

[tom502]

That vid did not debunk Adamski's craft footage. Their fake footage is totally different than the real stuff.

[TheOneandOnly]

Mars is covered with liquid water lakes and forests.
http://www.marsanomalyresearch.com/

Dude, you cant be serious... Look at Mars with a telescope... You'll see a dry, barren, dusty planet..

Or let me guess, everything foresty and watery is on the 'other' side that we can't see?

[jamesstew]

That vid did not debunk Adamski's craft footage. Their fake footage is totally different than the real stuff.

The video isn't necessary; anyone that doesn't desperately want to believe can tell it's a piece of crap model stuck on a window; look at the way the background shifts in relation to the orientation of the model, consider the fact that George Adamski was a first degree douchebag/attention-whore and lastly the fact that hubcaps with ping pong balls glued to the bottom can't fly and the truth is crystal clear.

love,
jamesstew
NWO Agent and one of the Sheeple

[tom502]

If you look at the Mars site, and really examine the footage, you can see lakes, and flora. Looking at the Earth from Mars, I don't think all we have here would be very clear, especially if the Martians only used black and white photos with a blue filter. The Nasa Mars photos also use an artificial color filter, and the pics are not in true color. They do that to not have a mass of greenery visible.

[WickedKitchen]

I think Mars will be just the testing grounds. Other solar systems are the future, i think. Teraforming can and will work but i think the time needed for such a task and waiting to see if it really worked will outweigh the viability of this option. I think we'll find another planet that will be more plug-n-play.

I don't think that we'll find much different things on Mars really. I mean the elements located there should be similar to those on earth. I can't wait until we find something that we cannot explain...a new element with new properties...one that will forever change our perception of how things are. That, and I'd like to be able to debunk the big-bang theory. Don't get me wrong, I don't have a better one, but the big-bang theory makes a giant assumption.

Now, a 39-day ride to Mars? I'd go on that for sure. A one-year tour would be much more productive than making a go at it with no real hopes of returning.

[jamesstew]

If you look at the Mars site, and really examine the footage, you can see lakes, and flora. Looking at the Earth from Mars, I don't think all we have here would be very clear, especially if the Martians only used black and white photos with a blue filter. The Nasa Mars photos also use an artificial color filter, and the pics are not in true color. They do that to not have a mass of greenery visible.

Now I know you're trolling us.

[tom502]

Everything I said here is a fact and you can research it yourself.
Nasa admitted to using a color filter. And the rover on Mars was admitted to being stuck in mud.
The Nasa photos show large lakes and forests. Though everything is black and white photo with a false orangish color tint.

[devilock76]

Everything I said here is a fact and you can research it yourself.
Nasa admitted to using a color filter. And the rover on Mars was admitted to being stuck in mud.
The Nasa photos show large lakes and forests. Though everything is black and white photo with a false orangish color tint.

When someone presents things as "facts" then it is on them to prove it. Hence why research papers have a works cited page.

Ken

[devilock76]

That vid did not debunk Adamski's craft footage. Their fake footage is totally different than the real stuff.

Flashing back to someone's fake moon landing footage. HMMMMM. Shoe, meet the other foot.

Ken

[tom502]

[truthwolf1]

MINISTRY.

That looks like Arizona.

The best way to get a correct image is to use curves. You select the white point on the image and also the darkest.

[texasmade]

Of course you agree the sky is blue, but then I say it is because of an energy field placed there by Martian intelligence and reason would dictate you say now hold on a minute.

Ken

The sky is clear. It only appears blue.

[jamesstew]

Flashing back to someone's fake moon landing footage. HMMMMM. Shoe, meet the other foot.

Ken

And the various pictures of hubcaps with ping-pong balls glued to the bottom.

And:

[jamesstew]

C'mon Tom, admit it's fake. You can see the straight line on the back proving it's glued to a piece of glass:

[Darwin]

There is only one way to get a color "correct" image and that is to have place a standard "gray card" somewhere in the scene and, theoretically, when the image is adjusted to make that card a neutral gray the rest of the image color values will fall into place. It's not a perfect solution obviously but otherwise getting the "correct" color in an image is merely a guessing game. Worse than guessing really since every digital image capture and display device has its own non-linear peculiarities thus making even the concept of correct color a chimerically fruitless pursuit.