Frustration with the TSA has reached the boiling point..

**Darwin** · 30-11-10, 05:48 AM

I notice that even with the metallic ink the shorts still allow a significant glimpse of the dude's package.

**sgreger1** · 30-11-10, 06:56 AM

Originally posted by Darwin View Post

I notice that even with the metallic ink the shorts still allow a significant glimpse of the dude's package.

I love how when darwin sees an advertisement for something he automatically stares extra hard to see if he can make out the dudes groin. Lol

**CoderGuy** · 30-11-10, 07:53 AM

Originally posted by sgreger1 View Post

I love how when darwin sees an advertisement for something he automatically stares extra hard to see if he can make out the dudes groin. Lol

I don't think the images are real. The scanners do not have the power to see bone, they see through cloths, not skin.

**Bigblue1** · 30-11-10, 07:54 AM

Originally posted by CoderGuy View Post

I don't think the images are real. The scanners do not have the power to see bone, they see through cloths, not skin.

Who says?

**CoderGuy** · 30-11-10, 08:57 AM

Originally posted by Bigblue1

Who says?

They do when they keep saying they are safe and low powered. If they were strong enough to see bone like real x-rays everyone would be wearing lead jackets (well they might be if they were made in China lol) and there would be MUCH more uproar about the safety, especially for children and elderly.

**Bigblue1** · 30-11-10, 10:56 AM

and you believe what they say? They already got caught in the lie about it not being invasive and it didn't show our junk. why would you believe them now? If you ever would have would have been a mistake,,,,,

**CoderGuy** · 30-11-10, 03:46 PM

Originally posted by Bigblue1 View Post

and you believe what they say? They already got caught in the lie about it not being invasive and it didn't show our junk. why would you believe them now? If you ever would have would have been a mistake,,,,,

And also that the images aren't stored and no one else will see them, both lies.

**raptor** · 30-11-10, 06:29 PM

Originally posted by CoderGuy View Post

And also that the images aren't stored and no one else will see them, both lies.

I'm not inclined to go tin-foil hat, but if you were say carrying a bomb on your person they would want the image on the scanner to help prosecute you. So there must be some means to capture images. They must be lying.

**sgreger1** · 30-11-10, 06:43 PM

Originally posted by CoderGuy View Post

I don't think the images are real. The scanners do not have the power to see bone, they see through cloths, not skin.

No the images are certainly real. It's not powerfull enough to see through bone but just enough to see through clothing.

They coul solve all of this by using a rendered 3d manaquin on the screen instead of showing someones actual body, that way it is not so much of a privacy issue and they can still identify solid objects just as well.

**sgreger1** · 30-11-10, 06:46 PM

Originally posted by raptor

I'm not inclined to go tin-foil hat, but if you were say carrying a bomb on your person they would want the image on the scanner to help prosecute you. So there must be some means to capture images. They must be lying.

I think that was the intent, though entirely unecessary. Once they have identified the objects, they will search you and take them as evidence. Physical evidence holds up better than a picture on a scanner. And in all fairness they orriginally did claim there was no way to store the images, but then it turned out that they were keeping all the images, so I mean that does make one not want to trust them.

**Darwin** · 30-11-10, 07:31 PM

Yeah they're definitely lying about keeping them even if they have no real intent to do so since they must be in some computer's memory if they are to be displayed so consequently they are vulnerable. As everyone knows, or should know, anything entered into any computer on the planet is not completely safe from hacking. Sure the TSA scanner images may be deleted after they are used but if the system is hacked the image feed could go anywhere and then be saved there. Bottom line is if anyone does not want something private on a computer, any computer, exposed either by accident or intentional hack then they'll simply have to disconnect from the net entirely. Which of course in large part renders a computer pretty much a useless lump.

All this mess may just may bring back the forgotten art of letter writing, and of mailing real paper checks for payment as well. Might well put a huge crimp into the speed of info distribution and commerce, putting us back to at least the 1970s in that regard, but there may not ultimately be much of a choice. If you store financial info on your computer, offline or on, then heaven help you no matter how many layers of security you have.

**Frosted** · 02-12-10, 04:54 AM

Man arrested after ejaculating during TSA pat-down

November 21, 2010 by Dead Serious News · Leave a Comment

A 47 year old gay man was arrested at San Francisco International Airport after ejaculating while being patted down by a male TSA agent. Percy Cummings, an interior designer from San Francisco, is being held without bail after the alleged incident, charged with sexually assaulting a Federal agent.
According to Cummings’ partner, Sergio Armani, Cummings has “multiple piercings on his manhood” which were detected during a full body scan. As a result, Cummings was pulled aside for a pat-down. Armani stated that the unidentified TSA agent spent “an inordinate amount of time groping” Cummings, who had apparently become sexually aroused. Cummings, who has a history of sexual dysfunction, ejaculated while the TSA agent’s hand was feeling the piercings. The TSA agent, according to several witnesses, promptly called for back up. Cummings was thrown to the ground and handcuffed.
A TSA spokesperson declined to comment on this specific case, but said that anyone ejaculating during a pat-down would be subject to arrest

**Frosted** · 02-12-10, 04:55 AM

http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=31a_1291234348

A woman rolls up in only underwear and in a wheelchair.

**raptor** · 02-12-10, 05:00 AM

Originally posted by Frosted

Man arrested after ejaculating during TSA pat-down

November 21, 2010 by Dead Serious News · Leave a Comment

A 47 year old gay man was arrested at San Francisco International Airport after ejaculating while being patted down by a male TSA agent. Percy Cummings, an interior designer from San Francisco, is being held without bail after the alleged incident, charged with sexually assaulting a Federal agent.
According to Cummings’ partner, Sergio Armani, Cummings has “multiple piercings on his manhood” which were detected during a full body scan. As a result, Cummings was pulled aside for a pat-down. Armani stated that the unidentified TSA agent spent “an inordinate amount of time groping” Cummings, who had apparently become sexually aroused. Cummings, who has a history of sexual dysfunction, ejaculated while the TSA agent’s hand was feeling the piercings. The TSA agent, according to several witnesses, promptly called for back up. Cummings was thrown to the ground and handcuffed.
A TSA spokesperson declined to comment on this specific case, but said that anyone ejaculating during a pat-down would be subject to arrest

Yeah that's seriously ****ed up. Not the dude, but TSA.

**AtreyuKun** · 02-12-10, 05:12 AM

Originally posted by Darwin View Post

All this mess may just may bring back the forgotten art of letter writing, and of mailing real paper checks for payment as well. Might well put a huge crimp into the speed of info distribution and commerce, putting us back to at least the 1970s in that regard, but there may not ultimately be much of a choice.

I'm sure I'm not the only only one who thinks that wouldn't be the worst thing in the world. There are some aspects of our lives that could stand to be rolled back 30 or 40 years.