Mama Don't Take My Kodachrome Away

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • lxskllr
    Member
    • Sep 2007
    • 13435

    Mama Don't Take My Kodachrome Away

    PARSONS, Kan. — An unlikely pilgrimage is under way to Dwayne’s Photo, a small family business that has through luck and persistence become the last processor in the world of Kodachrome, the first successful color film and still the most beloved.


    Steve Hebert for The New York Times




    Kodachrome rewarded generations of skilled users with a richness of color and a unique treatment of light.




    Dwayne’s Photo, in Parsons, Kan., will be processing the final rolls of it Thursday.

    That celebrated 75-year run from mainstream to niche photography is scheduled to come to an end on Thursday when the last processing machine is shut down here to be sold for scrap.

    In the last weeks, dozens of visitors and thousands of overnight packages have raced here, transforming this small prairie-bound city not far from the Oklahoma border for a brief time into a center of nostalgia for the days when photographs appeared not in the sterile frame of a computer screen or in a pack of flimsy prints from the local drugstore but in the warm glow of a projector pulling an image from a carousel of vivid slides.

    In the span of minutes this week, two such visitors arrived. The first was a railroad worker who had driven from Arkansas to pick up 1,580 rolls of film that he had just paid $15,798 to develop. The second was an artist who had driven directly here after flying from London to Wichita, Kan., on her first trip to the United States to turn in three rolls of film and shoot five more before the processing deadline.

    The artist, Aliceson Carter, 42, was incredulous as she watched the railroad worker, Jim DeNike, 53, loading a dozen boxes that contained nearly 50,000 slides into his old maroon Pontiac. He explained that every picture inside was of railroad trains and that he had borrowed money from his father’s retirement account to pay for developing them.

    “That’s crazy to me,” Ms. Carter said. Then she snapped a picture of Mr. DeNike on one of her last rolls.

    Demanding both to shoot and process, Kodachrome rewarded generations of skilled users with a richness of color and a unique treatment of light that many photographers described as incomparable even as they shifted to digital cameras. “Makes you think all the world’s a sunny day,” Paul Simon sang in his 1973 hit “Kodachrome,” which carried the plea “Mama, don’t take my Kodachrome away.”

    As news media around the world have heralded Thursday’s end of an era, rolls of the discontinued film that had been hoarded in freezers and tucked away in closets, sometimes for decades, have flooded Dwayne’s Photo, arriving from six continents.

    “It’s more than a film, it’s a pop culture icon,” said Todd Gustavson, a curator from the George Eastman House, a photography museum in Rochester in the former residence of the Kodak founder. “If you were in the postwar baby boom, it was the color film, no doubt about it.”

    Among the recent visitors was Steve McCurry, a photographer whose work has appeared for decades in National Geographic including his well-known cover portrait, shot in Kodachrome, of a Afghan girl that highlights what he describes as the “sublime quality” of the film. When Kodak stopped producing the film last year, the company gave him the last roll, which he hand-delivered to Parsons. “I wasn’t going to take any chances,” he explained.

    At the peak, there were about 25 labs worldwide that processed Kodachrome, but the last Kodak-run facility in the United States closed several years ago, then the one in Japan and then the one in Switzerland. Since then, all that was left has been Dwayne’s Photo. Last year, Kodak stopped producing the chemicals needed to develop the film, providing the business with enough to continue processing through the end of 2010. And last week, right on schedule, the lab opened up the last canister of blue dye.

    Kodak declined to comment for this article.

    The status of lone survivor is a point of pride for Dwayne Steinle, who remembers being warned more than once by a Kodak representative after he opened the business more than a half-century ago that the area was too sparsely populated for the studio to succeed. It has survived in part because Mr. Steinle and his son Grant focused on lower-volume specialties — like black-and-white and print-to-print developing, and, in the early ’90s, the processing of Kodachrome.

    Still, the toll of the widespread switch to digital photography has been painful for Dwayne’s, much as it has for Kodak. In the last decade, the number of employees has been cut to about 60 from 200 and digital sales now account for nearly half of revenue. Most of the staff and even the owners acknowledge that they primarily use digital cameras. “That’s what we see as the future of the business,” said Grant Steinle, who runs the business now.

    The passing of Kodachrome has been much noted, from the CBS News program ”Sunday Morning” to The Irish Times, but it is noteworthy in no small part for how long it survived. Created in 1935, Kodachrome was an instant hit as the first film to effectively render color.

    Even when it stopped being the default film for chronicling everyday life — thanks in part to the move to prints from slides — it continued to be the film of choice for many hobbyists and medical professionals. Dr. Bharat Nathwani, 65, a Los Angeles pathologist, lamented that he still had 400 unused rolls. “I might hold it, God willing that Kodak sees its lack of wisdom.”

    This week, the employees at Dwayne’s worked at a frenetic pace, keeping a processing machine that has typically operated just a few hours a day working around the clock (one of the many notes on the lab wall reads: “I took this to a drugstore and they didn’t even know what it was”).
    “We really didn’t expect it to be this crazy,” said Lanie George, who manages the Kodachrome processing department.

    One of the toughest decisions was how to deal with the dozens of requests from amateurs and professionals alike to provide the last roll to be processed.

    In the end, it was determined that a roll belonging to Dwayne Steinle, the owner, would be last. It took three tries to find a camera that worked. And over the course of the week he fired off shots of his house, his family and downtown Parsons. The last frame is already planned for Thursday, a picture of all the employees standing in front of Dwayne’s wearing shirts with the epitaph: “The best slide and movie film in history is now officially retired. Kodachrome: 1935-2010.”
    http://sites.google.com/site/earlykodachromeimages/

  • sgreger1
    Member
    • Mar 2009
    • 9451

    #2
    R.i.p. Kodachrome. Does this mean my daughter's generation won't get to enjoy the benefit of watching a genuine slide show with real slides and everything?

    Comment

    • lxskllr
      Member
      • Sep 2007
      • 13435

      #3
      There's still Ektachrome, but some say it's inferior, and it doesn't have the mind share Kodachrome has...

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ektachrome

      Comment

      • GoVegan
        Member
        • Oct 2009
        • 5603

        #4
        Nice article! I saw an article recently that stated that digital cameras are now being phased out as the quality of camera phones has been improving. I like digital cameras but there was always something fun about dropping off a roll of film and then returning a few days later to see how the pictures turned out.

        Comment

        • muddyfunkstar
          Member
          • Aug 2010
          • 967

          #5
          Originally posted by sgreger1 View Post
          R.i.p. Kodachrome. Does this mean my daughter's generation won't get to enjoy the benefit of watching a genuine slide show with real slides and everything?
          Nah, There are loads of slide films out there, but Kodachrome was in a league of it's own, technically and aesthetically.

          Only the hardcore hobbyists shoot the stuff these days, though.

          Comment

          • Darwin
            Member
            • Mar 2010
            • 1372

            #6
            There are some Fuji transparency films that rival Kodachrome but they are mostly used by professionals anyway. It's a miracle that any actual silver based film is still being commercially processed. It will be a bloody long time until the projection of a digital image matches the clarity and impact of a properly projected Kodachrome slide, if it ever does. The demand for that level of quality just isn't there anymore.

            Comment

            • Ansel
              Member
              • Feb 2011
              • 3696

              #7
              The way i see it, digital [photography] is cold and soulless. Sure it can produce beautiful imagery but there is just no history behind it like there is with film. For me it is like an electronic cigarette compared with an organically grown tobacco cigarette. Crap analogy maybe, but what would Einstein have thought of an electronic cigarette. He would have thought of it how i think of digital. I'm not disputing that it doesn't have it's purpose. It does for sure. And, hopefully - both digital and film can co-exist.

              Comment

              • squeezyjohn
                Member
                • Jan 2008
                • 2497

                #8
                I think it's more akin to saying we should stop making all acoustic musical instruments and go with MIDI synthesisers for every musical application in the world.

                God knows - MIDI instruments and digital music is so amazingly advanced today that it can do almost anything. However - there is absolutely no way that the best programmer with the most expensive MIDI equipment can get anywhere near touching a classical orchestra or red-hot rock band for feeling and emotion. That's why I can't see a day that all those instruments being discontinued completely for a wealth of controllers and complicated software.

                Similarly - we may be seeing the decline of the mass-produced raw materials for proper analogue photography, but it's never going to go away entirely, which is a shame if you like good value well made film. But there are just too many good "organic" photographers across the globe to let it happen. If this film has enough of a cult following then you can bet that there's some enthusiast out there working on a replacement. You just have to find it, or get in there and start a business to cash in on the collective indignation of so many!

                Cheers

                Squeezy
                Squeezyjohn

                Sometimes wrong and sometimes right .... but ALWAYS certain!!!

                Comment

                • Darwin
                  Member
                  • Mar 2010
                  • 1372

                  #9
                  I dunno. Setting up a proper film manufacturing line sounds like an incredibly expensive undertaking and in such a declining market it sounds like a very poor investment. I agree about the artistic advantages of film, used to make my living with it, but the furshluginer march of progress is consigning film to a smaller and smaller niche of the market. Film may not disappear completely but it will become much harder to find, online only probably, and you'll likely have to process it yourself. Not that big a deal with B&W film but a serious, and expensive, pain in the tookus with color materials. The same applies to B&W and color printing papers and chemicals as well. You have to be a fairly determined hobbyist to deal with processing B&W film and printing on photo paper anymore and being able to do the same with color materials is rapidly receding in the rearview mirror. Of course one can digitally scan film and do digital printouts but that's rather a cheat in my estimation.

                  Comment

                  • lxskllr
                    Member
                    • Sep 2007
                    • 13435

                    #10
                    Originally posted by Darwin
                    I dunno. Setting up a proper film manufacturing line sounds like an incredibly expensive undertaking and in such a declining market it sounds like a very poor investment. I agree about the artistic advantages of film, used to make my living with it, but the furshluginer march of progress is consigning film to a smaller and smaller niche of the market. Film may not disappear completely but it will become much harder to find, online only probably, and you'll likely have to process it yourself. Not that big a deal with B&W film but a serious, and expensive, pain in the tookus with color materials. The same applies to B&W and color printing papers and chemicals as well. You have to be a fairly determined hobbyist to deal with processing B&W film and printing on photo paper anymore and being able to do the same with color materials is rapidly receding in the rearview mirror. Of course one can digitally scan film and do digital printouts but that's rather a cheat in my estimation.
                    It might be an interesting position of being desirable enough for small businesses to get into processing. It would be slow due to the mail system, but maybe profitable enough to work.

                    Comment

                    • Darwin
                      Member
                      • Mar 2010
                      • 1372

                      #11
                      There are a number of sources for color film processing that serve what's left of the market, online mostly, but that can only decline over time and probably not all that much time really. In five to ten years one is going to have to be pretty darn serious to do color photgraphy the old fashioned way. B&W will be around a lot longer and is a bunch easier to do at home, and of course has its own considerable artistic rewards. Oh yeah by "easier" I meant the expense of the materials, chemicals and equipment to set up a home B&W darkroom. Shooting and printing monochrome images is as challenging, possibly even more so, as working in color. It is also incredibly satisfying.

                      Comment

                      • monkeypunch
                        Member
                        • Feb 2011
                        • 125

                        #12
                        I was in my darkroom today. There is nothing more satisfying than seeing that image appear in a tray of Dektol

                        Comment

                        • Darwin
                          Member
                          • Mar 2010
                          • 1372

                          #13
                          I love the stink of darkroom chemicals in the morning. Microdol-x, Dektol, stop bath, fixer, Photo-Flo--the sweet stench of creativity. With steel reels and fiber paper only thank you very much. And oh yeah, The Zone System forever!

                          Comment

                          • Ansel
                            Member
                            • Feb 2011
                            • 3696

                            #14
                            Darwin, you know your onions. Respect!

                            Comment

                            • Frosted
                              Member
                              • Mar 2010
                              • 5798

                              #15
                              I totally hear and respect the argument for the old film and was a sceptic of both digital photography and music for a long time, but I feel that digital has now finally reached a very high quality in both of these areas.
                              Camera phones however will never take over - photographs can never be that good as the lenses are too small to let enough light in.

                              Heders photographs were incredible and they were only taken on a Nikon D80. To me they really had soul.

                              Comment

                              Related Topics

                              Collapse

                              Working...
                              X