Bhutan monk faces jail for anti-smoking law violation

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • snusjus
    Member
    • Jun 2008
    • 2674

    Bhutan monk faces jail for anti-smoking law violation

    By Subir Bhaumik BBC News, Calcutta

    A Buddhist monk is likely to face five years in prison for violating strict anti-smoking laws in the tiny Himalayan nation of Bhutan.

    Police have not named the monk but said he is 24 years old and was caught with 72 packets of chewing tobacco.

    Bhutan says it is determined to become the world's first smoking-free nation. It banned the sale of tobacco in 2005.

    But authorities admit that booming contraband traffic from neighbouring India has largely undermined the ban.

    Critics say the flow of illegal cigarettes is so strong that the ban has failed to make much of an impact.

    Kuensel newspaper said that the monk is the first person in the country to be charged under legislation passed in January which prohibits consuming and smuggling tobacco.

    An earlier law passed in 2005 gives police sweeping powers to enter homes and search for tobacco products.

    In addition it gives them power to jail shopkeepers for selling tobacco and arrest smokers if they fail to provide customs receipts for imported cigarettes - which are only permitted in very small quantities.

    Smokers can legally import only up to 200 cigarettes or 150 grams of other tobacco products a month. They must provide a customs receipt when challenged by police.

    A senior Bhutanese police official confirmed the arrest of the monk at the weekend after he failed to provide receipts to back his claim that he had purchased 72 packets of chewing tobacco from the Indian border town of Jaigaon.

    "We will charge him with smuggling of controlled material, which is a fourth degree felony," an official of the Bhutanese Narcotic Drug and Law Enforcement unit told the BBC.

    A fourth degree felony carries a sentence of five years.

    The monk told the police he was "not aware of the new laws and had not kept the receipt" - a claim police have not accepted.

    Monks are highly respected in a deeply religious society like Bhutan and thousands of them are maintained by the state.

    Bhutanese people - some of whom drink and smoke heavily - have largely complied with the new laws, though somewhat grudgingly.

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-south-asia-12329957

    I'm glad I don't live in Bhutan. I imagine it would be hell ordering snus over the internet!
  • truthwolf1
    Member
    • Oct 2008
    • 2696

    #2
    WOw! That sounds like what the future will be like in LAND OF THE FREE

    Comment

    • sgreger1
      Member
      • Mar 2009
      • 9451

      #3
      But authorities admit that booming contraband traffic from neighbouring India has largely undermined the ban.

      Critics say the flow of illegal cigarettes is so strong that the ban has failed to make much of an impact.

      Nuff said.

      Comment

      • lxskllr
        Member
        • Sep 2007
        • 13435

        #4
        Originally posted by truthwolf1 View Post
        WOw! That sounds like what the future will be like in LAND OF THE FREE
        Yup. I wouldn't laugh too hard at those guys. We're looking at our future :^S

        Comment

        • Snusdog
          Member
          • Jun 2008
          • 6752

          #5
          Critics say the flow of illegal snus is so strong that the ban has failed to make much of an impact.
          So when do we get to this phase
          When it's my time to go, I want to die peacefully in my sleep, like my uncle did....... Not screaming in terror like his passengers

          Comment

          • Mykislt
            Member
            • Sep 2010
            • 677

            #6
            AGAIN WITH THE ALARMIST BULL****
            Too lazy to rant

            I love Bhutan for its uniqueness. It is one of the poorest countries in the world, but the people are among the happiest. The leader once said "Happiness is more important than GDP" with which I agree. There is also a law there, that makes it mandatory to wear traditional clothing. I believe tourists have to pay 100 dollars or 200 dollars per day to visit there.

            Comment

            • Jwalker
              Member
              • May 2010
              • 1067

              #7
              Originally posted by Snusdog View Post
              So when do we get to this phase
              Right now I think I saw that in a finnish newspaper somewhere. Critics say the illegalization of snus by the E.U. directive has increased the youth usage rate as snus is cheaper and is sold informally among friends.

              Comment

              • Jwalker
                Member
                • May 2010
                • 1067

                #8
                Originally posted by Mykislt View Post
                AGAIN WITH THE ALARMIST BULL****
                Too lazy to rant

                I love Bhutan for its uniqueness. It is one of the poorest countries in the world, but the people are among the happiest. The leader once said "Happiness is more important than GDP" with which I agree. There is also a law there, that makes it mandatory to wear traditional clothing. I believe tourists have to pay 100 dollars or 200 dollars per day to visit there.
                Yes but is lack of happiness an imprisonable offense. Is saying I'm not happy in Bhutan so socially unacceptable like an american saying I think the jews blew up the twin towers.

                Comment

                • lxskllr
                  Member
                  • Sep 2007
                  • 13435

                  #9
                  Originally posted by Mykislt View Post
                  AGAIN WITH THE ALARMIST BULL****
                  Too lazy to rant

                  I love Bhutan for its uniqueness. It is one of the poorest countries in the world, but the people are among the happiest. The leader once said "Happiness is more important than GDP" with which I agree. There is also a law there, that makes it mandatory to wear traditional clothing. I believe tourists have to pay 100 dollars or 200 dollars per day to visit there.
                  Alarmist? Hardly...

                  But the enhanced ban that Clayton's board of aldermen approved last night goes a little too far -- in our humble opinion. The law bans smoking in city parks as well as all city-owned outdoor properties, such as parking lots.
                  http://blogs.riverfronttimes.com/dai...moking_ban.php

                  Santa Cruz, a ‘D’ in tobacco control? In this bastion of “tolerance,” smoking has been banned throughout all indoor public spaces, outdoor dining areas, parks, beaches, and downtown thoroughfares. My (exorbitantly overpriced) apartment building has imposed a smoking ban that even covers private residences. I don’t smoke, but my girlfriend does, and she is forced to shiver in the bitter – for California – cold when she wants to light up. That smell wafting into your apartment is not cigarette smoke: it’s illiberalism and intolerance.
                  http://trueslant.com/ethanepstein/20...moking-banned/

                  Missouri law says employers can’t discriminate in hiring because someone engages in what is a legal right — to use tobacco. But Kansas law is tougher. It permits employers to deny employment to smokers, Bernica said.
                  http://www.kansascity.com/2010/06/28...-starting.html

                  These are the USA exclusive laws I could find with a quick search. You can't smoke anywhere in public, and you can be denied employment for the sole fact you're a smoker. Is an outright ban really that implausible?

                  Comment

                  • BradenL
                    Member
                    • Dec 2010
                    • 187

                    #10
                    Just wait until the anti-tobacco nazis hear about this...you gotta wonder if they will side with him because of their shallow emotional affections, or if their cold fascist anti-tobacco side will come through and support capital punishment haha

                    Comment

                    • truthwolf1
                      Member
                      • Oct 2008
                      • 2696

                      #11
                      This is how it starts and eventually will lead to our snus. I remember talking to somebody once who said a smoking ban in bars is a good idea, and I replied so would a ban against intoxication. Why not just close the bars and save people's lives from drunk drivers?

                      Smoking ban extends to apartments in California city
                      http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/27/wo....19706667.html

                      Comment

                      • Mykislt
                        Member
                        • Sep 2010
                        • 677

                        #12
                        These are the USA exclusive laws I could find with a quick search. You can't smoke anywhere in public, and you can be denied employment for the sole fact you're a smoker. Is an outright ban really that implausible?
                        Almost everything is plausible, and I see where you are coming from, but you truly are alarmist. Smoking will not get banned in the next 20 years AT LEAST. Too many people smoke, a ban wouldn't do much, but waste money in enforcement (and you can not stop in the smuggling of smokes, trust me as a citizen of a border country to Russia), and the revenue from tax would be a huge blow. Maybe, if the culture makes it extremely hard to smoke, and a big portion of people just quit, move or die, but even then there would be the anti prohibition lobby to fight against, and lets face it, smoking is cool to teenagers, there will always be smokers. There is just too much stuff going on for a ban to be even imaginable right now.
                        If there was a ban, people would still smoke (it's not like people don't do drugs), and eventually the ban would have to be lifted.

                        You are sooo alarmist man: "loose will go out of production" "tobacco will get banned"

                        you should add hovering cars and a colony on mars to the list.

                        Comment

                        • lxskllr
                          Member
                          • Sep 2007
                          • 13435

                          #13
                          Originally posted by Mykislt View Post
                          You are sooo alarmist man: "loose will go out of production" "tobacco will get banned"

                          you should add hovering cars and a colony on mars to the list.
                          You can call it alarmism, but I've pretty much called all the bad happenings regarding tobacco since I've been here. I prefer to call it cynicism based on historical reality ;^)

                          Comment

                          • Mykislt
                            Member
                            • Sep 2010
                            • 677

                            #14
                            what historical reality exactly do you base your tobacco ban prediction man? I also happen to take pride into calling bull, on things like this. Also, I'm sorry if my tone is cold, or confrontational, I really am just here for the entertainment of conversation

                            Comment

                            • lxskllr
                              Member
                              • Sep 2007
                              • 13435

                              #15
                              Originally posted by Mykislt View Post
                              what historical reality exactly do you base your tobacco ban prediction man? I also happen to take pride into calling bull, on things like this. Also, I'm sorry if my tone is cold, or confrontational, I really am just here for the entertainment of conversation
                              I posted links. When enough communities ban smoking everywhere, including your apartment(!) and you can't get a job because you tested positive for nicotine, how much more banned does it have to be? I never said tobacco would disappear from the planet, but that doesn't mean things won't get VERY unpleasant. I can get heroin within a couple hours, but that doesn't make it any less banned, or negate the risks in acquiring it.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X