Originally posted by Premium Parrots
View Post
Bhutan monk faces jail for anti-smoking law violation
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by lxskllr View PostI meant to say something about this. Be careful with those ionizers, I don't completely trust them. They put out ozone as a byproduct, which is a highly unstable molecule, and can accelerate oxidation of your cells. I like the way way they smell, but I quit using them awhile ago.Grant me the serenity to accept the things I cannot change, the courage to change the things I can, and the wisdom to hide the bodies of the people I killed because they were annoying......
I've been wrong lots of times. Lots of times I've thought I was wrong only to find out that I was right in the beginning.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by rickcharles606 View Post
:^D
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by lxskllr View PostWhy's it have to be a black market?! That's racist!!
:^D
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by lxskllr View PostIt is a law. I linked the article above.
Edit:
I guess I didn't link the appropriate article. That refers to a private complex. Anyway, there's a place in CA that's banned smoking in apartments. I can't be arsed to look it up. I'm tired of looking up tobacco laws.
http://yourtown.pressdemocrat.com/20...h-smoking-ban/
Comment
-
-
Ah fun my school banned tobacco altogether. Could be a problem with me having 50 cans of snus and 3oz of pipe tobacco, and a bunch of nasal snuff but so far hasn't been there're still smoking sections off campus it's kind of funny I think the penalties for smoking are close to same for smoking weed neither of which are serious (if you have a card for weed of course). I love the no tobacco thing because it's not enforceable unlike smoking no one cares if you're using smokeless tobacco, unless you spit on the floor or leave your tobacco there they can't even tell, I can't see that changing and I can't see anyone being convinced someone else having a dip in their mouth effects them enough to care at least not compared to stuff like oh I don't know crime or the national debt or the wars or any other issue that 99 percent of americans care about more than tobacco.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by lxskllr View PostYes, when an apartment is rented out, you should expect it to be used. That's fine if he wants to levy a surcharge for cleaning after moving, but not any more than that; certainly not legislated through the government.
It's not law in the UK, but nearly all rental properties have no-smoking clauses these days. It's just the way it is.
As a private landlord myself, I have a no-smoking clause in my tenancy agreements. I can't afford to redecorate between tenancies. Obviously I expect the apartment to be used, but there's enough damage that has to get written off as "everyday wear and tear" to deal with, without having stained ceilings and stinking upholstery to deal with on top of it.
Comment
-
Comment