Astronomy and snus?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • CoderGuy
    Member
    • Jul 2009
    • 2679

    #31
    Originally posted by GN Tobacco Sweden AB View Post
    "The largest galaxy on record resides inside the Abell 2029 cluster, 1.07 billion light years away in the constellation of Serpens. Designated as IC 1101, the monstrous giant elliptical galaxy measures a whopping 6 million light years (as compared to the 100,000 light years of the Milky Way) in diameter and is said to be at least 60 times as large as the Milky Way. It also contains about 100 trillion stars (200-400 billion for the Milky Way)." it would be nice to sell some snus in that Galaxy
    That's HUGE! And many of those 100 trillion stars have planets around them.

    I am sure any of the advanced civilizations are solely snus users. How much for 100 trillion advert flyers? :P

    Comment

    • GN Tobacco Sweden AB
      Member
      • Mar 2011
      • 7035

      #32
      Originally posted by CoderGuy View Post
      That's HUGE! And many of those 100 trillion stars have planets around them.

      I am sure any of the advanced civilizations are solely snus users. How much for 100 trillion advert flyers? :P
      It would be an amount of 10x1 000 000 000 000x 300 000 000 i would Guess

      Comment

      • Frosted
        Member
        • Mar 2010
        • 5798

        #33
        I took part in the Galaxy Zoo classification project.http://www.galaxyzoo.org/ That might interest you GN.

        What I find mind blowing apart from the boggling size of the universe is the fact that there is a high probability of other universes pressing on ours like bubbles.
        Even more boggling is parallel universe theory.

        I love this stuff but prefer others to do the maths.

        Comment

        • Darwin
          Member
          • Mar 2010
          • 1372

          #34
          Mr. Paul I doubt you're an etymology freak but I've often wondered why U.K. usage retained the "s" in the shorthand for mathematics whereas in the U.S. we lost that usage.

          Comment

          • Frosted
            Member
            • Mar 2010
            • 5798

            #35
            Originally posted by Darwin View Post
            Mr. Paul I doubt you're an etymology freak but I've often wondered why U.K. usage retained the "s" in the shorthand for mathematics whereas in the U.S. we lost that usage.
            You did away with loads of stuff. Aeroplane, aluminium, moustache, pyjamas, sledge, speciality, - you tend to take the u out of things in general - neighbour, humour, colour.

            math ematic s

            Comment

            • Darwin
              Member
              • Mar 2010
              • 1372

              #36
              We still use sledge in reference to big hammers and also referring to heavy wooden runnered cargo sleds. Yeah we did get rid of a lot of "u"s but only it seems when they tandem with an "o". Also, oddly, we do say "airplane" but we also say "aeronautics" and "aerodynamics". In the U.K you say "aeroplane" but unless I'm mistaken you also have "airlines" flying "airliners". The "maths/math" one is a bit of an oddity since we both use "mathematics". Funny how the linguistic currents ebb and flow.

              Comment

              • Frosted
                Member
                • Mar 2010
                • 5798

                #37
                It's easier to say math rather than maths. We don't really need an 'o' in colour.

                I think Americans just got rid of the bullshit. England is packed full of bullshit.
                English has changed beyond all recognition. Have you read Chaucer? Americanisms are creeping in over here so our language might even come round to your method in the future.

                Comment

                • Darwin
                  Member
                  • Mar 2010
                  • 1372

                  #38
                  Yeah it seems that High Culture flows westward across the Atlantic and Pop Culture flows eastward. I think we're getting the better end of the deal, to put it mildly. The always linguistically aggrieved French would doubtless agree.

                  Comment

                  • Frosted
                    Member
                    • Mar 2010
                    • 5798

                    #39
                    About 04:00 I saw a meteor come down over London. First one I've seen.

                    Comment

                    • GN Tobacco Sweden AB
                      Member
                      • Mar 2011
                      • 7035

                      #40
                      It is hard to dispell the thought that Earth has the only living organisms in the entire universe. There is no concrete evidence of other lifeforms outside of Earth, but one has to think there has to be somewhere in areas we haven't even looked at with a telescope yet!
                      We may one day prove that there is life beyond earth, and possibly even beyond our solar system. But we will never be able to prove that there is no life beyond earth.


                      You can use Drake's equation to determine for yourself however the equation itself is based on your own interpretations
                      The Drake equation states that: N=R*x Fp x ne x fe x fi x fc x L
                      where:
                      N is the number of civilizations in our galaxy with which communication might be possible;

                      and
                      R* is the average rate of star formation per year in our galaxy
                      fp is the fraction of those stars that have planets
                      ne is the average number of planets that can potentially support life per star that has planets
                      fℓ is the fraction of the above that actually go on to develop life at some point
                      fi is the fraction of the above that actually go on to develop intelligent life
                      fc is the fraction of civilizations that develop a technology that releases detectable signs of their existence into space
                      L is the length of time such civilizations release detectable signals into space


                      I hope this helps to understand how you Can figur out snus Usage outside of Our solar sistem

                      Comment

                      • AtreyuKun
                        Member
                        • Aug 2009
                        • 1223

                        #41
                        Originally posted by precious007 View Post
                        time is only an illusion, a man made measurement...
                        I won't say time is an illusion per se. It's a valid unit of measure which we use to determin certain events. I think the real illusion is the one that separates mind and thought from matter and energy. I believe that's actually where evolution will take us. It may not be the next step, but I believe that we will unify thought and energy. It isn't religious or spiritual at all, just another aspect of nature we haven't discovered yet.

                        Comment

                        • GN Tobacco Sweden AB
                          Member
                          • Mar 2011
                          • 7035

                          #42
                          http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c8CgD...e_gdata_playerGN wont's to be this big

                          Comment

                          • deadohsky
                            Member
                            • Nov 2009
                            • 625

                            #43
                            I saw that a while GN, it's really amazing looking at how massive objects in the universe really can be.

                            Comment

                            • GN Tobacco Sweden AB
                              Member
                              • Mar 2011
                              • 7035

                              #44
                              http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cW7Bv...e_gdata_player
                              Just little somthing to Chew in evening

                              Comment

                              • Frosted
                                Member
                                • Mar 2010
                                • 5798

                                #45
                                This is why we'll never find other life in the universe unless we can a. travel faster than the speed of light, or b. Bend time or fold the universe somehow.

                                This video is well worth a look as it helps us grasp the vastness of our universe.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X