World trade center Building 7 was a controlled demolition

[Bigblue1]

[Monkey]

Holy shit!!!!!!!










Ed Asner looks ancient......like the pyramids.

[shikitohno]

A youtube video says it was done by Jews in Mossad. Clearly, with such great evidence as youtube documentaries, no further investigation is needed. I've heard plenty of arguments that it was a planned job, and all of them have been from people who are wholly unqualified to make the call for one of two reasons. The most common, they're conspiracy theory loving stoners who say, "Dude, no way, look at that man. The government is lying to us." The less common of the two is that they are qualified people who simply couldn't have access to all relevant information because they're basing their entire expert opinion on what they saw on TV. If there were a credible alternate theory out there, I'd look into it, but most of them strike me as more grounded in speculation and disbelief that the US could've actually been attacked than in any sort of substantial evidence.

[Bigblue1]

A youtube video says it was done by Jews in Mossad. Clearly, with such great evidence as youtube documentaries, no further investigation is needed. I've heard plenty of arguments that it was a planned job, and all of them have been from people who are wholly unqualified to make the call for one of two reasons. The most common, they're conspiracy theory loving stoners who say, "Dude, no way, look at that man. The government is lying to us." The less common of the two is that they are qualified people who simply couldn't have access to all relevant information because they're basing their entire expert opinion on what they saw on TV. If there were a credible alternate theory out there, I'd look into it, but most of them strike me as more grounded in speculation and disbelief that the US could've actually been attacked than in any sort of substantial evidence.

Did you not watch the video. 1300 Architects and engineers are not credible sources? The fact that many buildings succumb to fires and not one has ever imploded into it's own foot print until this one isn't telling enough for you. You cannot say that video is baseless. But I'm sure you didn't even watch it......... But your right more investigation is needed, too bad the government will not allow it......... I wonder why?

[Premium Parrots]

Holy shit!!!!!!!










Ed Asner looks ancient......like the pyramids.

with a bit of white hair on his head and a white beard he would make a great Santa Clause

[shikitohno]

Did you not watch the video. 1300 Architects and engineers are not credible sources? The fact that many buildings succumb to fires and not one has ever imploded into it's own foot print until this one isn't telling enough for you. You cannot say that video is baseless. But I'm sure you didn't even watch it......... But your right more investigation is needed, too bad the government will not allow it......... I wonder why?

Nope, I'll watch it later, but you missed that second part. Architects and engineers are perfectly well qualified, but as I said, so far the only ones I've seen going contrary to the official version of events weren't people who witnessed it first-hand, or had an opportunity to examine the site and debris. They've been architects and engineers who've watched it on TV. I've got an uncle who's an engineer who'll tell you that in his 30 odd years of experience as an engineer, the ones who claim it had to be a demolition are talking out their asses. I'll put the clip on later, but I'll warn you, enough of my friends are trying to convince me of all sorts of 9/11 conspiracies, and I've yet to meet one that actually holds up to scrutiny and explains the events better than the official description of events.

[truthwolf1]

My longtime suspicion was that building 7 was meant for flight 93.

http://911research.wtc7.net/sept11/a...anomalies.html

Building 7 imploded late on 9/11/01. It was not hit by an aircraft.
Building 7 experienced total collapse, allegedly because of fires, when no steel-frame building before or since has ever collapsed, totally or even partially, due to fires. Building 7 was an over-engineered 47-story steel-frame skyscraper, standing over 350 feet from the nearest of the Twin Towers. Public evidence documents only small fires in it on September 11th.
Building 7 collapsed in a nearly perfectly vertical fall, producing only minor damage in the Verizon and Post Office buildings only 60 feet on either side of it.
Building 7 collapsed into a remarkably small rubble pile of mostly pulverized remains, when no steel building falling for any reason has ever pulverized itself.
Building 7 contained a 15-million-dollar emergency command center, but instead of using it for its ostensible purpose, then-Mayor Giuliani evacuated his team to a makeshift command center as soon as the September 11th attack started. 11 12
The emergency command center was destroyed along with the rest of the building, even though it was constructed as a bomb-hardened shelter.
The remains of Building 7 were rapidly removed and the steel recycled, evidently without any on-site and only extremely limited off-site examination. The rapid disposal operation proceeded despite the fact that no one was believed buried in the rubble, and the tidy rubble pile was not blocking adjacent roads.

[Bigblue1]

Even Fox news shill Geraldo Rivera is questioning the official story now. This after he has lambasted the truth movement for years.

[shikitohno]

My longtime suspicion was that building 7 was meant for flight 93.

http://911research.wtc7.net/sept11/a...anomalies.html

Building 7 imploded late on 9/11/01. It was not hit by an aircraft.
Building 7 experienced total collapse, allegedly because of fires, when no steel-frame building before or since has ever collapsed, totally or even partially, due to fires. Building 7 was an over-engineered 47-story steel-frame skyscraper, standing over 350 feet from the nearest of the Twin Towers. Public evidence documents only small fires in it on September 11th.
Building 7 collapsed in a nearly perfectly vertical fall, producing only minor damage in the Verizon and Post Office buildings only 60 feet on either side of it.
Building 7 collapsed into a remarkably small rubble pile of mostly pulverized remains, when no steel building falling for any reason has ever pulverized itself.
Building 7 contained a 15-million-dollar emergency command center, but instead of using it for its ostensible purpose, then-Mayor Giuliani evacuated his team to a makeshift command center as soon as the September 11th attack started. 11 12
The emergency command center was destroyed along with the rest of the building, even though it was constructed as a bomb-hardened shelter.
The remains of Building 7 were rapidly removed and the steel recycled, evidently without any on-site and only extremely limited off-site examination. The rapid disposal operation proceeded despite the fact that no one was believed buried in the rubble, and the tidy rubble pile was not blocking adjacent roads.

These are the sort of reasons I question the official version. Not trying to write off all of the theories bigblue, just saying I haven't really come across one yet that's convinced me.

[Lulie]

Really interesting video, thanks BigBlue. I've been looking at a lot of these videos the last few weeks with the 10 year anniversary and everything, I am not 100% convinced either way, but I think they are fancinating to watch.

[dpete]

These are the sort of reasons I question the official version. Not trying to write off all of the theories bigblue, just saying I haven't really come across one yet that's convinced me.

I wondered if the fix was in when they wanted to put Henry Kissinger in charge of the commission but had to settle for Lee Hamilton. Hamilton was of great use to GHW Bush in the first Iraq debacle so was pressed into service again for Junior. No matter what that day visually shows and whatever evidence remains, the actions afterwards of the powers-that-be do not demonstrate to me that they are interested in doing nothing more than running out the clock.

Ed Asner is fantastic. He will always be Lou Grant but I also think of him in a movie drunkenly pistol-whipping Jack Lemmon.

[triplethreat675]

I too question the official version, However I have a hard time believing that it was an internal govt. planned job. The elephant in the room for me on this one is this... WHO planted the thermite? Is it possible that cheap labor was contracted to maintain the trade center as many large structure owners do? Is it possible that this (help) was part of an al-queda sleeper cell in New York? Is it possible that while doing routine maintence that these operatives straped thermite to the support columns? We already know that this attack was well planned by al-queda. They trained four pilots to fly large passenger aircraft with pinpoint accuracy. Any pilot will tell you that flying a plane that low and in a large city such as new york creates alot of issues with wind vectoring and especially a large aircraft with slower response to inputs. My personal opinion is that all three buildings were rigged with thermite as a "just in case the plane doesnt bring it down" contingency plan. Building 7 was never hit and the decision was made to set the thermite reaction in play. Magnesium ribbon couldve been the ignition device for the thermite and routed disguised as cat5 cable(phone wire) to a central point where an ignitor was attached or remotely controlled. Thermite when mixed as a large batch is fairly consistent in burn time and energy displaced, severing the columns at close but probably not the exact same moment.


Why the Govt. has been so slow and unwilling to admit that explosives such as thermite were involved is simple. There were people who were already screaming "inside job" before the search for life had turned into recovery. some believed the govt. contracted pilots to fly into the buildings. If the govt. admits to the presence of explosives in the rubble it would fuel the conspiritors fire, they in turn would have the rest of this great country believing that their govt. commited a mass murder of 3000 of its own citizens, likely leading to mass riots in the streets, and the kindof crap we've seen in the middleeast the last 6 months.

Do I know any of this to be fact? NO, I was in Eau Claire WI the day of the attacks sitting in biology class, a sophmore in high school. It is my personal hypothesis no more and no less. But it would cover the gaps in information and it lets me sleep at night...

[Roo]

This line of investigation is going to kick open some doors. I had long ago discarded 9/11 conspiracy theories, or a better way to put it would be that I simply stopped thinking about them, but I am more than willing to keep an open mind based on this video I just watched. If the whole thing can be examined one step at a time, without preconceived notions and biases, some truth may come out of such a process. Bigblue did not post the video to convince anyone it was an inside job or spout off some conspiracy theories, he posted it for people to watch and respond to the content of the video. So... watch the video!

[Bigblue1]

[RobsanX]

I just watched a video on one of those cop shows that showed a tanker truck that crashed into a bridge, and caught fire. This bridge was made from 24 inch I-beams, but that fire softened those beams, and the bridge came crashing down. It's not hard for me to believe that fire weakened the structure of these buildings, and they collapsed.