Honestly overpopulation is probably the biggest problem humanity faces. Were presently in a sixth major extinction according to the number of species dying a year. This planet's pretty much doomed unless something starts to change.
The lack of respect and the decline of today's society. (RANT)
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by charmandoHonestly overpopulation is probably the biggest problem humanity faces. Were presently in a sixth major extinction according to the number of species dying a year. This planet's pretty much doomed unless something starts to change.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by precious007I don't think I am intelligent. I really AM intelligent on an IQ scale but that's another story.
Who said prison population was a good measure of intelligence? Did I? Nope.
The highest scored IQ Romanians, once hackers, (IQ 160+), work for Microsoft, CIA and NASA.
[/quote[Are you questioning me, whether I want that or not? Lmao. (you're making wrong connections here sorry) Dude, I was just saying that during the communist party there was more respect in the society, loooooooooooooooooooool, no where near saying I want the government to control everything we do.[/quote]
You were saying that communism was better in the old days because people would be jailed for having abortions, talking back to the cops etc, hence you are advocating for an oppressive government to enforce a fake "respect" via fear tactics. In America respect is EARNED, not issued.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Thunder_SnusHow bout this. Every male receives a vasectomy when they're born. This process cannot be reversed until someone is 21(just an example age could be whatever). Teenage pregnancies would be eliminated unless caused by 35 year old pedo's. No accidental pregnancies unless there is a large gap between the male and female in age. People would have to decide they want to have children and get that vasectomy reversed. Reverse vasectomy has about a 64% success rate if i remember correctly. Right there HALF of potential pregnancies are eliminated and the population is reduced. No jobs but many people looking? Boom gone.
I think the thing with stupid people having children is more educated people take advantage of birth control and plan their families more carefully rather than "shit think im pregnant."
It's just a thought, call me stupid or whatever you want I can handle it.
It's that there are several people in this world that lead the way and kinda' dictate the laws.
Everyone should have the right to make kids, no matter their shape or form.
The paranoic masons that have the ability to look at the matrix for a much more deeper perspective are inventing all sorts of ways of destroying the humanity.
Because that's their purpose - they even admit it.
Comment
-
-
Omg, the stupid literally burns my face... IQ tests aren't a good metric by which one should judge intelligence, as you would know if you were actually intelligent.
An intelligence quotient, or IQ, is a score derived from one of several different standardized tests designed to assess intelligence.
you're trying to reinvent the wheel it ain't working buddy
not with me anyways
I would be ashemed to make that post you made earlier lmao, basically I can't stop laughing at what you've just said =))
learn what intelligence is, and then we can discuss more on the subject.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Thunder_SnusHow bout this. Every male receives a vasectomy when they're born. This process cannot be reversed until someone is 21(just an example age could be whatever). Teenage pregnancies would be eliminated unless caused by 35 year old pedo's. No accidental pregnancies unless there is a large gap between the male and female in age. People would have to decide they want to have children and get that vasectomy reversed. Reverse vasectomy has about a 64% success rate if i remember correctly. Right there HALF of potential pregnancies are eliminated and the population is reduced. No jobs but many people looking? Boom gone.
I think the thing with stupid people having children is more educated people take advantage of birth control and plan their families more carefully rather than "shit think im pregnant."
It's just a thought, call me stupid or whatever you want I can handle it.
Vascetomys have a 64% rate according to you, so you would immediately cut 26% of the population from having kids? That means a cumulative reduction of 26% in population, per each generation? This is of course on top of those who are naturally sterile, those who will chose to not have kids etc. So potentially 4-50% of the population reduced with each generation? That sucks.
Also, no medical profesional would okay giving vasectomys to babies.
I think the thing with stupid people having children is more educated people take advantage of birth control and plan their families more carefully rather than "shit think im pregnant."
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by devilock76I think this is what most are pondering with regards to your posts.
Ken
:-)
I should have been out of the discussion way from the very start, but I like playin' around sometimes with people like sgreger that are trying to reinvent the wheel.
You were saying that communism was better in the old days because people would be jailed for having abortions, talking back to the cops etc, hence you are advocating for an oppressive government to enforce a fake "respect" via fear tactics. In America respect is EARNED, not issued.
You took things way too seriously sgreger ;-)
I am partially for communism, for your own information purely because of the respect between people that you clearly don't have, not because innocent people were killed.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by precious007Good spotting :-)
Otherwise...
Both of these quotesm, clearly show ignorance, immorality, fear and whatever but you name it.
Too much negative vibes here.
And to top it all I don't see why people are so impulsive to make some false statements and then not even recognize their mistake.
I'm out.
The second quote you listed about sterilization was not written by me, I am very against forced sterilization, so please do not attribute it to me. When the nazis were enforcing eugenics, we fought them, and we would gladly do the same again. It has nothing to do with fear, it has to do with the fact that it is an inherent right of the human species to be able to have children, and no government should be able to stop them.
Comment
-
-
I apologize. These were just rough numbers running through my head. The point was. Make people make the commitment to have kids. Go get that vasectomy reversed. I dont want children. I would love if I wasn't terrified at times if my girlfriend was taking her pill or if one of my condoms broke (yep dual use, yes i dont want children) Some people just keep having kids and some people dont get an education because they have children early.
Originally posted by sgreger1Vascetomys have a 64% rate according to you, so you would immediately cut 26% of the population from having kids? That means a cumulative reduction of 26% in population, per each generation? This is of course on top of those who are naturally sterile, those who will chose to not have kids etc. So potentially 4-50% of the population reduced with each generation? That sucks.
Also, no medical profesional would okay giving vasectomys to babies.
It is a fact that birth rates go down as education rates go up. Therefore, the solution to all of this, as well as the world population problem, is to encourage education. As they become more educated they will stop having so many kids, and there will be less stupid people due to education. But it is a bad idea to just sterilize or otherwise remove "less smart" people from the population for a variety of reasons, the largest of which is because we need people to flip our burgers and clean our toilets. Oh, and people who flip burgers aren't stupid either, that is more of a economic thing, some people can't afford college or don't go for other reasons.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by precious007Sgreger, go to sleep buddy
An intelligence quotient, or IQ, is a score derived from one of several different standardized tests designed to assess intelligence.
you're trying to reinvent the wheel it ain't working buddy
not with me anyways
I would be ashemed to make that post you made earlier lmao, basically I can't stop laughing at what you've just said =))
learn what intelligence is, and then we can discuss more on the subject.
But here is the thing IQ can change. Your brain can age and not be challenged and it gets lower. Additionally the brain can be trained like any muscle and the synapsis and neurons learn to fire faster and make better connections.
But even more so IQ has no determination on your contribution to society, there are people out there with high IQ's doing crime and/or menial jobs, and there are people with low IQ's doing charity work or in positions of power and prestige.
Ken
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by precious007Do you not see that sgregrer doesn't even know what intelligence is?
:-)
I should have been out of the discussion way from the very start, but I like playin' around sometimes with people like sgreger that are trying to reinvent the wheel.
Ken
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by sgreger1The second quote you listed about sterilization was not written by me, I am very against forced sterilization, so please do not attribute it to me. When the nazis were enforcing eugenics, we fought them, and we would gladly do the same again. It has nothing to do with fear, it has to do with the fact that it is an inherent right of the human species to be able to have children, and no government should be able to stop them.
Ken
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by precious007I would be ashemed to make that post you made earlier lmao, basically I can't stop laughing at what you've just said =))
learn what intelligence is, and then we can discuss more on the subject.
What post are you referring to? Which one should I be ashamed of?
And I know what a ****ing IQ test is, I am saying that it is agreed that it is not necessarily a good measure of ACTUAL intelligence, but rather effort. Just like the standardized SAT exams we take here in the US to get into colleges isn't really a good measure of how smart you are or what you know, but rather just a measure of how good you are at memorizing and repeating certain snippets of information for the test.
Precious, the fact you keep claiming how intelligent you are (even above intelligent!) directly disproves your claims. It has long been known and studied that truly intelligent and competent individuals tend to underevaluate their level of intelligence, i.e. truly intelligent people always think they aren't smart enoughh, while idiots frequently believe they are intelligent. Guess which group you fall into.
Comment
-
Comment