RANT (v. 2.0)

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • wa3zrm
    Member
    • May 2009
    • 4436

    RANT (v. 2.0)

    The Story of Civilization

    In the beginning humans were just another animal. They were no different than any other beast of the forest. They had no deep thoughts, they had no higher skills than a wolf or an otter. They hunted for food, sometimes hunting each other, killing another of their own kind didn't mean anything. They ate whatever was at hand, they killed for food and grouped together and killed for security like wolves, they mated with whatever they could catch.


    Somewhere along the line humans developed the ability to understand the idea of cause and effect, and from there they learned to predict. If they did this, then that would occur. Just a very basic version of it at first. If we did not kill or eat the baby it would grow up to be another hunter or another child bearer, this was useful knowledge.


    They were able to predict that certain animals would have their own young at certain times of the year, that herds of animals migrated on certain routes and in certain seasons. The seasons themselves were predictable. They soon shared this information with future generations by painting them on the walls of caves.


    Someday one or more of these primitive humans noticed that certain activities impacted the human condition in negative ways. They decided to pressure others not to do these 'bad' things. They realized that some behaviors were more productive than others and they began to pressure others to do these 'good' things.


    They soon realized that human nature was still animalistic, the default setting was not good but bad, and all of their efforts to improve the human condition would have to come in opposition to this basic human nature. Today the religious might call this the “sin nature”. This sin nature inside all of us might be what we call the devil, or Satan.


    If humans had never tried to fight this nature of the beast they would never have become civilized. We look back from today and we say that this dictator or that warlord was uncivilized, but go back farther and all humans were much less civilized. We see the Holocaust or the Killings Fields as uncivilized by our modern standards because of how far we have come in fighting our basic human nature.


    Every step on the ladder of civilization has raised our expectations of the future. Might we someday truly conquer crime and poverty? Shouldn't we continue to try? Those are civilized thoughts, we want to make the human condition better than it is. Some of us.


    Today, though, the forces of regression have become quite strong. They chisel at the very foundations of civilization, they tie dynamite around the planks that keep it above water. Certainly many of them are not intentionally trying to bring down civilization itself, they just want to give away to their own lusts or ideas and then they want it normalized for everyone. The result is the same thing, a return to primitive barbarism or even to animalism.


    If one percent of the population is homosexual, that would not impact humankind to a great degree but when governments and powerful forces encourage it, normalize it and praise it, then it becomes a force against civilization. It is the same with child sex, crimes, idleness (welfare). When a tiny portion of humans are doing it, there is no real problem. When culture or government encourage these things they come to do a great deal of harm to civilization.
    If you have any problems with my posts or signature


  • lxskllr
    Member
    • Sep 2007
    • 13435

    #2
    The mistake is calling what we have/do civilized. We're pulling the same old bullshit we did 20,000 years ago, but now it's dressed up in law and custom. Where once it was the strongest that prevailed, it's now the rich, and their governmental backers.

    Comment

    • Ainkor
      Member
      • Sep 2008
      • 1144

      #3
      How the hell can you compare being homosexual to being a perpetrator of a child sex crime?

      Animals act homosexual in nature at approximately the same percentage as humans.

      How do you explain to a 14 year old who has no feelings for the opposite sex yet is attracted to the same sex? Do you tell them they are wrong?

      I know this will blow up but you are so far off base that it isn't even funny. I'm not gay but get this.... In the bible, a sin is a sin and aside from denying the father, all are equal in the eyes of God. I sin, you sin, we all sin. Get the hell over people being gay, let them be happy and crawl back in your little small minded shell of a life.

      Ban me if you want mods, but this post is atrocious and ridiculous.

      Comment

      • lxskllr
        Member
        • Sep 2007
        • 13435

        #4
        Originally posted by Ainkor
        How the hell can you compare being homosexual to being a perpetrator of a child sex crime?

        Animals act homosexual in nature at approximately the same percentage as humans.

        How do you explain to a 14 year old who has no feelings for the opposite sex yet is attracted to the same sex? Do you tell them they are wrong?

        I know this will blow up but you are so far off base that it isn't even funny. I'm not gay but get this.... In the bible, a sin is a sin and aside from denying the father, all are equal in the eyes of God. I sin, you sin, we all sin. Get the hell over people being gay, let them be happy and crawl back in your little small minded shell of a life.

        Ban me if you want mods, but this post is atrocious and ridiculous.
        The OP was copypasta from a middle America right wing leaning paper, not the OP himself(I don't think). It's interesting to think about what queer revolutionaries would look like though :^D

        Comment

        • Ainkor
          Member
          • Sep 2008
          • 1144

          #5
          Originally posted by lxskllr
          The OP was copypasta from a middle America right wing leaning paper, not the OP himself(I don't think). It's interesting to think about what queer revolutionaries would look like though :^D
          Sounds like it. It was also posted word for word at http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2884152/posts

          Comment

          • Roo
            Member
            • Jun 2008
            • 3446

            #6
            Don't take it too harsh Ainkor, wa3zrm apparently never thinks for himself, and if he does, he doesn't tell us about it. He just copies and pastes drivel into these here boards. How weak is it to not only have small-minded thoughts, but lack the ability to even express them yourself? Pretty ****ing weak.

            Edit: the first 3/4 of that "rant", before the odd homosexual addendum, was expressed 2300 years ago by a man named Xun Zi. Look it up wa3zrm and quit wasting your time reading the contemporary crap you post, you might learn something worth repeating. Not to be too harsh on you man, but that was just dumb.

            Comment

            • wa3zrm
              Member
              • May 2009
              • 4436

              #7
              Originally posted by Roo
              Don't take it too harsh Ainkor, wa3zrm apparently never thinks for himself, and if he does, he doesn't tell us about it. He just copies and pastes drivel into these here boards. How weak is it to not only have small-minded thoughts, but lack the ability to even express them yourself? Pretty ****ing weak.

              Edit: the first 3/4 of that "rant", before the odd homosexual addendum, was expressed 2300 years ago by a man named Xun Zi. Look it up wa3zrm and quit wasting your time reading the contemporary crap you post, you might learn something worth repeating. Not to be too harsh on you man, but that was just dumb.
              But it got you to respond to the post... and that's what I enjoy the most!
              If you have any problems with my posts or signature


              Comment

              • Roo
                Member
                • Jun 2008
                • 3446

                #8
                Originally posted by wa3zrm
                But it got you to respond to the post... and that's what I enjoy the most!
                And that's called trolling!

                Comment

                • sgreger1
                  Member
                  • Mar 2009
                  • 9451

                  #9
                  Jesus f@cking christ.. If I gave this the facepalm it deserved I would need to go to the emergency room due to a cracked cranium.

                  Homosexuality is not a choice, it is a genetic thing. A certain percentage of humans will be homosexual, this has always been the case. For thousands of years, in huge empires like Rome, all the way down to smaller hunter gatherer communities in Paupau New Geneau, homosexuality was very openly encouraged and engrained in the culture. It just wasn't seen as being "gay". We suppressed it in the west for a long time, and now it is coming back out again.

                  The point: Homosexuality as expressed in the population will not increase regardless of government policies, culture, or any other pressures short of killing them off via some Hitleresque form of eugenics. They have always been there, it's just that now society isn't suppressing them and forcing them to stay in the closet so you are seeing more of them.

                  I SAY AGAIN, nothing we do will make homosexuality more "prevalent", any more than we could increase the instances of gingers by having the government give them rights, accepting them into our culture etc. It does not work that way.


                  Edit: And if you are worrying about pedophiles and child rapists than you are going after the wrong demographic. White heterosexual males are statistically the most likely to abuse or sexually assault young children more often than homosexuals by a LARGE margin. Should we not encourage being a white heterosexual male in order to combat this? And what about animal f@ckers? Right, I mean homosexuality leads to bestiality doesn't it?? Oh wait, there are many cultures where men lose their virginities to donkeys first before they are seen as experienced enough for a female. The females expect it of them. Check out the Vice Guide to "asses of the Carribean" for more on this. Has society collapsed there? No.

                  Face it, some people are into different shit than you, some is cultural, and most is genetic. There is no argument, moral or otherwise, against giving rights to gays. None.


                  Edit 2:

                  Might we someday truly conquer crime and poverty? Shouldn't we continue to try? Those are civilized thoughts, we want to make the human condition better than it is. Some of us.
                  More like, "Might we someday conquer injustice, and truly allow freedom and liberty for all, and extend civil rights to every man, woman and child on this earth? (<-- Hint, gays are a part of that group).

                  I think being gay is weird as **** and I don't personally understand it, but I am educated enough to understand that it's just part of human nature (just like I don't understand people with foot fetishes or those who watch fart porn). I hang out with gay guys regularly, this being san fran and all, and I think most of their shit is weird as **** and I think it's nasty. But I would never in a million years ask the government to take away their rights and suppress them for God's sake. Grow up America!

                  Comment

                  • wa3zrm
                    Member
                    • May 2009
                    • 4436

                    #10
                    If you have any problems with my posts or signature


                    Comment

                    • sgreger1
                      Member
                      • Mar 2009
                      • 9451

                      #11
                      Originally posted by lxskllr
                      It's interesting to think about what queer revolutionaries would look like though :^D
                      Fabulously rebellious I would imagine?

                      Comment

                      • thegameisover2k2
                        Member
                        • Jan 2011
                        • 92

                        #12
                        its not normal for a dick to go into a butthole. Its not natural...there is nothing right about it. But helfl...why not let them marry...but you cant stop there...if marriage isnt between a man and woman anymore...just about who or what you have sex with...people should be able to marry pets...fleshlights...whatever...give me a break.

                        Comment

                        • lxskllr
                          Member
                          • Sep 2007
                          • 13435

                          #13
                          Originally posted by thegameisover2k2
                          its not normal for a dick to go into a butthole. Its not natural...there is nothing right about it. But helfl...why not let them marry...but you cant stop there...if marriage isnt between a man and woman anymore...just about who or what you have sex with...people should be able to marry pets...fleshlights...whatever...give me a break.
                          Marriage is an artificial construct created by humans. As an artificial construct, if you don't treat all people equally, you're violating the Declaration of Independence, and the US Constitution. The two choices are ban marriage for everyone as a governmental function(my preferred solution), or allow gay marriage, polygamy, and possibly some other niche models I'm not aware of.

                          Comment

                          • BadAxe
                            Member
                            • Jan 2010
                            • 631

                            #14
                            Originally posted by Ainkor
                            I know this will blow up but you are so far off base that it isn't even funny. I'm not gay but get this.... In the bible, a sin is a sin and aside from denying the father, all are equal in the eyes of God. I sin, you sin, we all sin. Get the hell over people being gay, let them be happy and crawl back in your little small minded shell of a life.
                            Dude, who cares what man calls a sin. The bible is man made, as is god. Referring to the book of fables, err, I mean the bible, to lecture someone is laughable. Amazing people still believe in the myth called god in 2012. god stopped being an answer for any questions as soon as science started explaining things with facts. As soon as someone mentions the bible to try and prove something, I immediately dismiss them. The bible was written by man, so all you are doing by living by the bible is living under mans rule. It was all designed to control us, and keep us in order, and thats exactly what it does to those close minded individuals that can do no free thinking and see how much of a joke "god" is.

                            Comment

                            • truthwolf1
                              Member
                              • Oct 2008
                              • 2696

                              #15
                              I believe that we were seeded here from a higher species like TOM did.

                              Comment

                              Related Topics

                              Collapse

                              Working...
                              X