'We Do' Campaign: Gay Couples In The South Apply For Marriage Licenses, Get Rejected

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Crow
    Member
    • Oct 2010
    • 4312

    'We Do' Campaign: Gay Couples In The South Apply For Marriage Licenses, Get Rejected


    Matt Griffin and Raymie Wolfe participated in the 'We Do' campaign, in which couples solicit marriage licenses from clerks in states that will not issue licenses to same-sex couples.

    NEW YORK -- This week, on a rainy day in a rural Tennessee county, Matt Griffin, Raymie Wolfe and a group of 50 or so supporters approached a classic Southern courthouse (white facade, ornate wooden portico, clock tower) and asked for a marriage license.

    "The clerk was very respectful," said Wolfe, "but at the end of it, we were officially rejected, and I asked her to make a record of that, so that people could see that we tried and that we were here."

    Griffin and Wolfe were participating in the 'We Do' campaign, a series of events organized by the Campaign for Southern Equality, a group based in Asheville, N.C., that is trying to change the conversation on same-sex marriage in the South. As other advocates have racked up victories for same-sex marriage in states like Maine, New York and Washington, most view the Southern states as unwinnable. Those at the Campaign for Southern Equality don't necessarily disagree with that premise, but they do disagree that Southern gay-rights advocates are powerless to advance their cause. In the hope of raising awareness of their demands, they've been applying for marriage licenses in states around the South -- and getting rejected.

    "The South has often been written off," said Rev. Jasmine Beach-Ferrara, the Executive Director of the Campaign for Southern Equality. "But we think we're uniquely positioned to tell a new story about what it means to be an LGBT person in the South."

    The dominant story about same-sex marriage -- and gay rights more broadly -- in the South has been disheartening for activists everywhere, but particularly for gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender Southerners, like Beach-Ferrara, who have witnessed the rest of the country making big steps toward the mainstream while the South has not. Starting in 2004, less than a year after the Massachusetts Supreme Court ruled that same-sex couples in the state had the right to marry, one Southern state after the next passed constitutional amendments defining marriage as being exclusively between one man and one woman. Even in the past year, as the country overall has shown signs of a major shift on same-sex marriage in polls and at the ballot box, the South appears not to have budged. In May, Beach-Ferrara's home state of North Carolina joined many of the other Southern states in banning same-sex marriage in their constitutions.
    Continued...
    Words of Wisdom

    Premium Parrots: only if the carpet matches the drapes.
    Crow: Of course, that's a given.
    Crow: Imagine a jet black 'raven' with a red bush?
    Crow: Hmm... You know, that actually sounds intriguing to me.
    Premium Parrots: sounds like a freak to me
    Premium Parrots: remember DO NOT TURN YOUR BACK ON CROW
    Premium Parrots: not that it would hurt one bit if he nailed you with his little pecker.
    Frosted: lucky twat
    Frosted: Aussie slags
    Frosted: Mind the STDs Crow
  • Zimobog
    Member
    • Jan 2013
    • 585

    #2
    The gang of thugs at the government should get out of the marriage business.

    Contracts between free people require no permission nor should the contract be subject to majority approval.

    The governmemt, if it has a legitamate purpose at all, should manage courts to hear suits of breach of contracts. But there is no reason that juries couldnt meet to hear cases without government direction.

    Get out of these folks lives. Good luck to them.

    Comment

    • GN Tobacco Sweden AB
      Member
      • Mar 2011
      • 7035

      #3
      Guys can someone explaine me why Gay- Iti is so promotional issue , honestly I don't understand it , why gays have to advertise them ? Make parades ? I mean what is so special with they're rights ??
      I don't have anything against gays . I do have problem with my intelegence -which is why media is so keen to show us how important are gays rights ( making movies , parades etc) - is there any clever person who can explain it to me - I will say what I understand from all of it is that someone or some people wants that we all will be gays by 2034 , but then we will not have children ... Then who we fight with so called terrorism will came and sleep with our wife's ...
      But those who will come and sleep with our wife's do not run our media and governments now is it so that I am
      Totally idiot or there is something else ???

      Comment

      • snusjus
        Member
        • Jun 2008
        • 2674

        #4
        Originally posted by GN Tobacco Sweden AB
        Guys can someone explaine me why Gay- Iti is so promotional issue , honestly I don't understand it , why gays have to advertise them ? Make parades ? I mean what is so special with they're rights ??
        I don't have anything against gays . I do have problem with my intelegence -which is why media is so keen to show us how important are gays rights ( making movies , parades etc) - is there any clever person who can explain it to me - I will say what I understand from all of it is that someone or some people wants that we all will be gays by 2034 , but then we will not have children ... Then who we fight with so called terrorism will came and sleep with our wife's ...
        But those who will come and sleep with our wife's do not run our media and governments now is it so that I am
        Totally idiot or there is something else ???
        Just as the Civil Rights Movement in the 20th century resorted to demonstrations and consciousness raising, the equality movement today utilizes media exposure to enhance the rights of all American citizens, regardless of their sexual orientation.

        I am of the opinion that the United States Constitution ought to apply to all citizens, whether they are heterosexual, homosexual, bisexual, transgender, etc.

        The 9th Amendment also makes it even more clear:

        "The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people."

        In a nutshell, it means that the inalienable rights of all citizens are to be preserved, even if they are not covered in the Constitution.

        Comment

        • GN Tobacco Sweden AB
          Member
          • Mar 2011
          • 7035

          #5
          Originally posted by snusjus
          Just as the Civil Rights Movement in the 20th century resorted to demonstrations and consciousness raising, the equality movement today utilizes media exposure to enhance the rights of all American citizens, regardless of their sexual orientation.

          I am of the opinion that the United States Constitution ought to apply to all citizens, whether they are heterosexual, homosexual, bisexual, transgender, etc.

          The 9th Amendment also makes it even more clear:

          "The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people."

          In a nutshell, it means that the inalienable rights of all citizens are to be preserved, even if they are not covered in the Constitution.
          Fully agree but there is some bitter aftertaste in mouth after all of this ... Are tobacco users pur of rich ... I mean do they have rights or do they have to have rights in form off promotion and parades ??

          Comment

          • lxskllr
            Member
            • Sep 2007
            • 13435

            #6
            Originally posted by GN Tobacco Sweden AB
            Fully agree but there is some bitter aftertaste in mouth after all of this ... Are tobacco users pur of rich ... I mean do they have rights or do they have to have rights in form off promotion and parades ??
            We can promote and parade(as citizens), but we'll still get screwed over because people don't recognize our rights. Tobacco's been vilified over the years, and the stupid masses don't/won't see a connection between our right to do what we want, and their right to do what they want. Fair? No, but I won't restrict or campaign for the restriction on the rights of others because my rights are violated. That accomplishes nothing, and would make me as bad as the tyrants I despise.

            Comment

            • whalen
              Member
              • May 2009
              • 6593

              #7
              Oh boy, Tobacco Parade!Click image for larger version

Name:	pp Gay.jpg
Views:	6
Size:	14.0 KB
ID:	596825
              wiki "Popcorn Sutton" a true COOT!

              Comment

              • Duff338
                Member
                • Sep 2011
                • 423

                #8
                Also...


                Which no one yet has mentioned....Gay chaps know how to throw a proper party.....

                Comment

                • GN Tobacco Sweden AB
                  Member
                  • Mar 2011
                  • 7035

                  #9
                  Originally posted by lxskllr
                  We can promote and parade(as citizens), but we'll still get screwed over because people don't recognize our rights. Tobacco's been vilified over the years, and the stupid masses don't/won't see a connection between our right to do what we want, and their right to do what they want. Fair? No, but I won't restrict or campaign for the restriction on the rights of others because my rights are violated. That accomplishes nothing, and would make me as bad as the tyrants I despise.
                  I never said if I do not eat then I am angry that others eat .. What I am saying is that we like lambs how we are directed that way we go and unfortunately no one can prove me opposite

                  Comment

                  • Crow
                    Member
                    • Oct 2010
                    • 4312

                    #10
                    Originally for Skellski.. Now for you, GN bróðir!

                    http://www.tubechop.com/watch/799319
                    Words of Wisdom

                    Premium Parrots: only if the carpet matches the drapes.
                    Crow: Of course, that's a given.
                    Crow: Imagine a jet black 'raven' with a red bush?
                    Crow: Hmm... You know, that actually sounds intriguing to me.
                    Premium Parrots: sounds like a freak to me
                    Premium Parrots: remember DO NOT TURN YOUR BACK ON CROW
                    Premium Parrots: not that it would hurt one bit if he nailed you with his little pecker.
                    Frosted: lucky twat
                    Frosted: Aussie slags
                    Frosted: Mind the STDs Crow

                    Comment

                    • GoVegan
                      Member
                      • Oct 2009
                      • 5603

                      #11
                      Odens extreme rainbow los?

                      Comment

                      • Frankie Reloaded
                        Banned Users
                        • Jan 2011
                        • 541

                        #12
                        What about divorces?

                        All those media hypes about rights to gay marriage and not a word about a gay divorce.

                        And: if there is an inalienable right of all citizens to marry according to their respective sex drives/tastes, why should zoofiles be excluded? Aren´t they humans too? Citizens? They should have the inalienable right to marry their pets, too.

                        Comment

                        • GoVegan
                          Member
                          • Oct 2009
                          • 5603

                          #13
                          Originally posted by Frankie Reloaded
                          What about divorces?

                          All those media hypes about rights to gay marriage and not a word about a gay divorce.

                          And: if there is an inalienable right of all citizens to marry according to their respective sex drives/tastes, why should zoofiles be excluded? Aren´t they humans too? Citizens? They should have the inalienable right to marry their pets, too.
                          Really? Gay marriage is between 2 consenting human adults of legal age. Are you trying to train your doggie to speak "I do"? Animals cannot speak for themselves. Also, why are you concerned about divorce rates? Perhaps we should outlaw marriage across the board. That will really drive down divorce rates.

                          Comment

                          • lxskllr
                            Member
                            • Sep 2007
                            • 13435

                            #14
                            Originally posted by Frankie Reloaded
                            And: if there is an inalienable right of all citizens to marry according to their respective sex drives/tastes, why should zoofiles be excluded? Aren´t they humans too? Citizens? They should have the inalienable right to marry their pets, too.
                            That's not consensual. Animals aren't competent to enter into a contract.

                            Comment

                            • Crow
                              Member
                              • Oct 2010
                              • 4312

                              #15
                              Originally posted by Frankie Reloaded
                              What about divorces?

                              All those media hypes about rights to gay marriage and not a word about a gay divorce.
                              What about it? You don't hear about straight divorces in the news (unless the couple were celebrities of some sort)...

                              Originally posted by Frankie Reloaded
                              And: if there is an inalienable right of all citizens to marry according to their respective sex drives/tastes, why should zoofiles be excluded? Aren´t they humans too? Citizens? They should have the inalienable right to marry their pets, too.
                              Not the first time I've heard that argument.........

                              First off, non-human animals cannot consent. Second, it's unfair to make the comparison of same-sex attraction to beastiality. We're talking about two consenting adults who love each other.
                              Words of Wisdom

                              Premium Parrots: only if the carpet matches the drapes.
                              Crow: Of course, that's a given.
                              Crow: Imagine a jet black 'raven' with a red bush?
                              Crow: Hmm... You know, that actually sounds intriguing to me.
                              Premium Parrots: sounds like a freak to me
                              Premium Parrots: remember DO NOT TURN YOUR BACK ON CROW
                              Premium Parrots: not that it would hurt one bit if he nailed you with his little pecker.
                              Frosted: lucky twat
                              Frosted: Aussie slags
                              Frosted: Mind the STDs Crow

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X