420 Policies and Laws

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Crow
    Member
    • Oct 2010
    • 4312

    The Seattle Times: "The Washington Legislature should legalize marijuana"

    MARIJUANA should be legalized, regulated and taxed. The push to repeal federal prohibition should come from the states, and it should begin with the state of Washington.

    In 1998, Washington was one of the earliest to vote for medical marijuana. It was a leap of faith, and the right decision. In 2003, Seattle was one of the first places in America to vote to make simple marijuana possession the lowest police priority. That, too, was a leap of faith, and the right decision. A year ago, City Attorney Pete Holmes stopped all prosecutions for simple possession: the right decision.

    It is time for the next step. It is a leap, yes — but not such a big one, now.
    Some drugs have such horrible effects on the human body that the costs of prohibition may be worth it. Not marijuana. This state's experience with medical marijuana and Seattle's tolerance policy suggest that with cannabis, legalization will work — and surprisingly well.

    Not only will it work, but it is coming. You can feel it.

    One sign: On Feb. 8, a committee of the state House of Representatives in Olympia held a public hearing on House Bill 1550. The bill would legalize marijuana and sell it through the state liquor stores to customers over 21 who consume it in private.

    The big issue at the hearing was the bill's conflict with federal law: the prospect of Washington legalizing marijuana in defiance of federal authority. What would that mean?

    There would be a legal and political fight. In our view, such a fight is bound to happen. Some state is going to start it. It might have been California, but the Golden State turned down a marijuana-legalization initiative Nov. 2, voting only 46 percent for it.

    Sometimes Washington is ahead of California. This state's voters were the first to approve gay civil unions, in 2009. California's voters didn't. Ours did.

    Pass HB 1550. Legalize cannabis, regulate it, tax it. It is radical, yet commonsensical.

    "It has taken me a long time to get to this position," said HB 1550's sponsor, Rep. Mary Lou Dickerson, D-Seattle.

    It took us a long time also. The people of Washington may already be there, and if not, they are close.
    http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/htm...it20legal.html
    Words of Wisdom

    Premium Parrots: only if the carpet matches the drapes.
    Crow: Of course, that's a given.
    Crow: Imagine a jet black 'raven' with a red bush?
    Crow: Hmm... You know, that actually sounds intriguing to me.
    Premium Parrots: sounds like a freak to me
    Premium Parrots: remember DO NOT TURN YOUR BACK ON CROW
    Premium Parrots: not that it would hurt one bit if he nailed you with his little pecker.
    Frosted: lucky twat
    Frosted: Aussie slags
    Frosted: Mind the STDs Crow

    Comment

    • GoVegan
      Member
      • Oct 2009
      • 5603

      Actually, Ron Paul has stated he would decriminalize marijuana use at the federal level and leave it up to the states. I am a Democrat and tend to vote liberal but I would be very tempted to vote for Ron Paul if he actually got the nomination. I have a feeling though that the conservatives will put some idiot like Palin up for election instead.

      Comment

      • charmando
        Member
        • Oct 2010
        • 151

        I don't think ron paul is running again. but then again they'll never elect a logical candidate capable of thinking for himself.

        Comment

        • GoVegan
          Member
          • Oct 2009
          • 5603

          Your probably right but Ron Paul seems to me what a true conservative should be all about. Now, the Republicans just elect people who love to talk about states rights and careful spending while they are enacting legislation and spending money like drunken sailors. This also seems to be true for the Democrats as well. I don't think Obama is terrible but in reality I don't see him do things that much more differently than Bush. It just seems like more of the same no matter who we vote for. I do know that I would vote for either Hillary Clinton or Ron Paul if they decide to run. I know they seem like complete opposites but I like the fact that they are both strong in their beliefs and apologize to no one. Now, if Ron Paul were to run and choose Clinton to be his vice president they would get my vote for sure.

          Comment

          • Crow
            Member
            • Oct 2010
            • 4312

            Originally posted by GoVegan View Post
            Now, if Ron Paul were to run and choose Clinton to be his vice president they would get my vote for sure.
            Yeah... That will happen
            Words of Wisdom

            Premium Parrots: only if the carpet matches the drapes.
            Crow: Of course, that's a given.
            Crow: Imagine a jet black 'raven' with a red bush?
            Crow: Hmm... You know, that actually sounds intriguing to me.
            Premium Parrots: sounds like a freak to me
            Premium Parrots: remember DO NOT TURN YOUR BACK ON CROW
            Premium Parrots: not that it would hurt one bit if he nailed you with his little pecker.
            Frosted: lucky twat
            Frosted: Aussie slags
            Frosted: Mind the STDs Crow

            Comment

            • GoVegan
              Member
              • Oct 2009
              • 5603

              Originally posted by The Seattleite View Post
              Yeah... That will happen
              Sorry to hijack your thread with my rants. I am glad to hear that the Seattle City Attorney is choosing to focus his efforts wisely. Especially when government budgets are stretched so thin.

              Comment

              • Crow
                Member
                • Oct 2010
                • 4312

                Originally posted by GoVegan View Post
                Sorry to hijack your thread with my rants. I am glad to hear that the Seattle City Attorney is choosing to focus his efforts wisely. Especially when government budgets are stretched so thin.
                No need to apologise.

                I will add that it would be nice if the President would decrim or reschedule cannabis, and let the states choose their own paths.
                Words of Wisdom

                Premium Parrots: only if the carpet matches the drapes.
                Crow: Of course, that's a given.
                Crow: Imagine a jet black 'raven' with a red bush?
                Crow: Hmm... You know, that actually sounds intriguing to me.
                Premium Parrots: sounds like a freak to me
                Premium Parrots: remember DO NOT TURN YOUR BACK ON CROW
                Premium Parrots: not that it would hurt one bit if he nailed you with his little pecker.
                Frosted: lucky twat
                Frosted: Aussie slags
                Frosted: Mind the STDs Crow

                Comment

                • GoVegan
                  Member
                  • Oct 2009
                  • 5603

                  Originally posted by The Seattleite View Post
                  No need to apologise.
                  Thanks and you should be quite proud. This is the first thread I have seen in a long time with absolutely no references to using or buying a fleshlight!

                  Comment

                  • charmando
                    Member
                    • Oct 2010
                    • 151

                    all i can say about clinton is she would get shit done, but did you read the wikileaks about her ordering u.s. diplomats to spy on u.n. leaders? We don't need any more enemies.

                    Comment

                    • charmando
                      Member
                      • Oct 2010
                      • 151

                      rons on fox business proposing a new idea were you can opt out of most taxes

                      Comment

                      • charmando
                        Member
                        • Oct 2010
                        • 151

                        his idea was you pay 10 percent on what you make and expect nothing from your government. no tobacco tax!!!

                        Comment

                        • sgreger1
                          Member
                          • Mar 2009
                          • 9451

                          Govegan your spot on man. I dont know why Ron Paul can't win either, every republican I talk to says they'd vote for him, and most democrats I talk to say they'd vote for him. Is the voting rigged or are people just following the "Don't want to waste my vote since he can't win" line of thinking.

                          Comment

                          • sgreger1
                            Member
                            • Mar 2009
                            • 9451

                            Originally posted by charmando View Post
                            his idea was you pay 10 percent on what you make and expect nothing from your government. no tobacco tax!!!
                            Yah as much as I love Ron Paul, that idea totally wouldn't work.

                            Comment

                            • raptor
                              Member
                              • Oct 2008
                              • 753

                              Originally posted by charmando View Post
                              rons on fox business proposing a new idea were you can opt out of most taxes
                              Ron Paul has a lot of loony theoretical ideas whose net result is the destruction all social/public systems we have. Yeah, sure, it might be great if you already make enough to live comfortably, but not for Americans on the whole.

                              Doesn't mean he is bad—he is one of the few politicians to openly question our recent war efforts and our unyielding support of Israel—but no one should follow anyone blindly.

                              Comment

                              • charmando
                                Member
                                • Oct 2010
                                • 151

                                the ten percent thing basically only covers your national security and would only apply to you if you wanted it to. you wouldn't have to deal with the government but you also can't expect anything in return. i'm just curious why that is a bad idea.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X