Nuke the ISIS degenerates for beheading the journalist

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • whalen
    Member
    • May 2009
    • 6593

    #31
    Originally posted by trebli View Post
    The only hope I can see for a lasting peace is to split Iraq into three sovereign nations. The different tribes and sects cannot live together without constant conflict and bloodshed.

    1.) Kurd Land in the north.

    2.) Sunni Land in the center

    3.) Shia Land in the south
    4. Or some good old hearts and minds programs at work.....arts and crafts for example.....how about a giant fused glass ceramics class that results in a giant no mans land right in the middle?
    wiki "Popcorn Sutton" a true COOT!

    Comment

    • Andy105
      Member
      • Nov 2013
      • 1393

      #32
      Originally posted by whalen View Post
      4. Or some good old hearts and minds programs at work.....arts and crafts for example.....how about a giant fused glass ceramics class that results in a giant no mans land right in the middle?
      I like #4. They would just fight along the borders of 1, 2, & 3, anyway. We could name it BP-stan.
      Click image for larger version

Name:	image.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	87.8 KB
ID:	597565

      Comment

      • Thunder_Snus
        Member
        • Oct 2011
        • 1316

        #33
        Originally posted by trebli View Post
        The only hope I can see for a lasting peace is to split Iraq into three sovereign nations. The different tribes and sects cannot live together without constant conflict and bloodshed.

        1.) Kurd Land in the north.

        2.) Sunni Land in the center

        3.) Shia Land in the south
        Also build a new Jerusalem in the middle of the mexican desert?

        Comment

        • Frankie Reloaded
          Banned Users
          • Jan 2011
          • 541

          #34
          I think Americans should mind their own business. Oh wait: Oil is their business, notwithstanding the nations currently living on the soil above the oil. Then you have to nuke ISIS and everybody else who tries to stop the American looting. Yeah, baby. Nuke them for killing a fuctard American, because we can relate to him and his belief he can go wherever he likes and do whatever he pleases oh so well...

          BTW, the killer of the journalist was British. Maybe a nice nuclear exchange between US and UK would be much more appropriate... or at least much more fun than watching a bully with a big club threatening a pack of smaller kids.

          Comment

          • wa3zrm
            Member
            • May 2009
            • 4436

            #35
            If you have any problems with my posts or signature


            Comment

            • Burnsey
              Member
              • Jan 2013
              • 2572

              #36
              Originally posted by wa3zrm View Post
              The part about the goat is crossing the line imo..............

              Comment

              • alopezg1
                Member
                • Jul 2013
                • 722

                #37
                and who supplied these terrorists with goats??!! Hmmm I wonder

                Comment

                • rickcharles606
                  Member
                  • Mar 2009
                  • 2307

                  #38
                  Originally posted by Frankie Reloaded View Post
                  I think Americans should mind their own business. Oh wait: Oil is their business, notwithstanding the nations currently living on the soil above the oil. Then you have to nuke ISIS and everybody else who tries to stop the American looting. Yeah, baby. Nuke them for killing a fuctard American, because we can relate to him and his belief he can go wherever he likes and do whatever he pleases oh so well...

                  BTW, the killer of the journalist was British. Maybe a nice nuclear exchange between US and UK would be much more appropriate... or at least much more fun than watching a bully with a big club threatening a pack of smaller kids.
                  Wow, this is the dumbest mini-rant I've seen in awhile. Name one conflict that the US was involved in that we came away with oil rights? If your statement were true, we'd have already moved right into Iraq and taken over the oil fields, but we didn't. Now, don't get me wrong...I really wish we would have done that very thing, I mean hell...we help your country, you give us oil. Sounds like a fair trade to me. I'd tell you to suck my fat American cock, but that would be against the TOU. So, I won't do that and feel free to rant on :-)

                  Comment

                  • Burnsey
                    Member
                    • Jan 2013
                    • 2572

                    #39
                    Originally posted by rickcharles606 View Post
                    Wow, this is the dumbest mini-rant I've seen in awhile. Name one conflict that the US was involved in that we came away with oil rights? If your statement were true, we'd have already moved right into Iraq and taken over the oil fields, but we didn't. Now, don't get me wrong...I really wish we would have done that very thing, I mean hell...we help your country, you give us oil. Sounds like a fair trade to me. I'd tell you to suck my fat American cock, but that would be against the TOU. So, I won't do that and feel free to rant on :-)
                    Your restraint and maturity are appreciated......

                    Comment

                    • whalen
                      Member
                      • May 2009
                      • 6593

                      #40
                      Rut freekin Ro!
                      wiki "Popcorn Sutton" a true COOT!

                      Comment

                      • Frankie Reloaded
                        Banned Users
                        • Jan 2011
                        • 541

                        #41
                        http://247wallst.com/energy-business...osure-to-iraq/

                        Comment

                        • rickcharles606
                          Member
                          • Mar 2009
                          • 2307

                          #42
                          Yeah, so? Seems to me that private companies with international reach are doing business with Iraq's oil ministry....NOT the US Government. These private companies benefit as does the Iraqi Oil ministry, from their involvement together. These companies neither run our gov't, nor do they direct the actions of our military? Are you pissed because these companies aren't Slovakian, lol? I mean, it's not like we went into Iraq and set up the United States of America Oil Company and are simply stocking our federal oil reserves, NOW there's an idea? Our soldiers died, as did other country's men (not Slovakian BTW) and I think they deserve to be repaid for their sacrifice. Now, in a country that is rich in two things, oil and sand, which do you think makes the most sense?

                          Comment

                          • Andy105
                            Member
                            • Nov 2013
                            • 1393

                            #43
                            Originally posted by rickcharles606 View Post
                            Yeah, so? Seems to me that private companies with international reach are doing business with Iraq's oil ministry....NOT the US Government. These private companies benefit as does the Iraqi Oil ministry, from their involvement together. These companies neither run our gov't, nor do they direct the actions of our military? Are you pissed because these companies aren't Slovakian, lol? I mean, it's not like we went into Iraq and set up the United States of America Oil Company and are simply stocking our federal oil reserves, NOW there's an idea? Our soldiers died, as did other country's men (not Slovakian BTW) and I think they deserve to be repaid for their sacrifice. Now, in a country that is rich in two things, oil and sand, which do you think makes the most sense?
                            True! And there's nothing wrong with protecting the flow of oil anywhere. Until a viable alternative comes up, most people would be sitting naked and hungry in the dirt without it.
                            The US gets the most of its oil from non- Mideast countries, anyway.
                            http://www.npr.org/2012/04/11/150444...y-be-surprised
                            Last edited by Andy105; 24-08-14, 06:01 PM. Reason: added link to show your Mom.

                            Comment

                            • Frankie Reloaded
                              Banned Users
                              • Jan 2011
                              • 541

                              #44
                              The US government massacres the people, then US companies come to pump the oil with impunity. Thugs first, containers for the loot second. Even when they allow others to take part of the loot, the others have to pay a share of every stolen barrel to the US.

                              Right, but ISIS are the bad guys... because they killed a journalist.

                              Comment

                              • Frankie Reloaded
                                Banned Users
                                • Jan 2011
                                • 541

                                #45
                                It's still inhuman criminal behavior and should be dealt with swiftly.
                                Which one? Killing a journalist? Or murdering some estimated 650,000 people in Iraq? The first one is a heinous crime and the second just a boring statistics?

                                http://web.mit.edu/humancostiraq/

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X