Sex Reassignment Surgery at Age 74

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • wa3zrm
    Member
    • May 2009
    • 4436

    Sex Reassignment Surgery at Age 74

    Medicare Win Opens Door for Transgender Seniors

    CHICAGO — Denee Mallon marveled at the view of Lake Michigan from her hospital bed in the Windy City, where she had just made history: the then 74-year-old transgender woman underwent a milestone sex reassignment surgery she'd sought for decades. "Here I am, finally, after all these years," she said. "It happened."

    Her operation will be one of the first paid for by Medicare after she won a challenge in May to end the government insurance program's ban on covering such procedures for transgender individuals. Mallon's victory opened the door for other seniors to access this care and may influence whether more insurers - private and public - will cover them. LGBT advocates also hailed her case as another step forward to securing equal rights for transgender people.
    The Medicare decision comes as the number of private insurance companies offering transition-related coverage has surged in recent years. Human Rights Campaign, which advocates for LGBT equality, said about 34 percent of the Fortune 500 companies today — up from 10 percent in 2009 — offer transgender-inclusive health care benefits, including surgical. Many employers have started to address coverage for transgender individuals, and most have experienced little to no premium increases as a result, HRC said in its annual Corporate Equality Index.
    Five states' Medicaid programs — California, Massachusetts, Vermont, the District of Columbia and Oregon — cover transgender health services, including sex reassignment surgery, in their plans for lower-income and disabled people. Ten states have banned health insurance discrimination against transgender people (the five listed above plus Colorado, Connecticut, Illinois, Washington, and most recently, New York).
    The hope, transgender advocates say, is that the Medicare decision will encourage more Medicaid programs and private insurers to offer coverage.

    (Excerpt) Read more at nbcnews.com ...
    If you have any problems with my posts or signature


  • Burnsey
    Member
    • Jan 2013
    • 2572

    #2
    Really, at 74?

    Comment

    • squeezyjohn
      Member
      • Jan 2008
      • 2497

      #3
      I think the point is ... it was paid for under Medicare ... for Medicare read the NHS if you're in the UK ... that's where the polemic lies ... is gender reassignment the duty of the taxpayer? I believe that fundamental healthcare is a human right and wealthy countries should provide that for it's citizens ... But is it a universal right to undergo ANY medical procedure that you can think of that you might fancy?? ... that way madness lies! And that way will undermine any well-meaning national healthcare program!
      Last edited by squeezyjohn; 05-01-15, 02:44 AM.
      Squeezyjohn

      Sometimes wrong and sometimes right .... but ALWAYS certain!!!

      Comment

      • squeezyjohn
        Member
        • Jan 2008
        • 2497

        #4
        To clarify ... I would like 2 dicks ... it would double my pleasure in life ... and if the NHS put enough money in to research they could probably work out how to do it!

        But it's not what I have naturally ... and I don't think everyone else should pay for that.

        Life is a balance of obligation and responsibility ... to everyone ... and for everyone!
        Squeezyjohn

        Sometimes wrong and sometimes right .... but ALWAYS certain!!!

        Comment

        • wa3zrm
          Member
          • May 2009
          • 4436

          #5
          Originally posted by squeezyjohn View Post
          To clarify ... I would like 2 dicks ...
          Interesting... this is one of the few times I can say that I laughed so hard that I started to cry!

          Carry on...
          If you have any problems with my posts or signature


          Comment

          • Burnsey
            Member
            • Jan 2013
            • 2572

            #6
            Originally posted by squeezyjohn View Post
            To clarify ... I would like 2 dicks ... it would double my pleasure in life ... and if the NHS put enough money in to research they could probably work out how to do it!

            But it's not what I have naturally ... and I don't think everyone else should pay for that.

            Life is a balance of obligation and responsibility ... to everyone ... and for everyone!
            I giggled at this as well, but it is the ammunition used by the Right here to put negative spin on Socialized Medicine. (I'm picturing Sarah Palin bitching about "Death Panels", etc, as I type this.)
            I don't think we should have to pay for sex reassignment or double dicks either if the current equipment functions properly and poses no health risk to a patient. The biggest question in the argument is who determines what is necessary treatment, and how much we should pay of each others medical bills.

            Comment

            • wa3zrm
              Member
              • May 2009
              • 4436

              #7
              Originally posted by Burnsey View Post
              The biggest question in the argument is who determines what is necessary treatment....
              OK, I can't resist this. Would the two dick surgery be functional or purely cosmetic? I would assume that a functional operation would cost much more than just a cosmetic attachment?
              If you have any problems with my posts or signature


              Comment

              • Andy105
                Member
                • Nov 2013
                • 1393

                #8
                Although I would happily donate $50 to Squeezy's Double-Dick Fund, I don't think we should all be forced to by the government. Basic health care? Sure. But if he wants the luxury of two dicks, he should be prepared hustle up the funding on his own. I already pay $1,300 per month for health insurance, and it's slated to go up this year. I can't afford to buy an extra dick for everybody.

                Comment

                • halocog
                  Member
                  • Oct 2011
                  • 649

                  #9
                  Healthcare is so messed up. Penis pumps and viagra are perfectly fine, but birth control for women is scrutinized like it's the devil. Personally, I don't give a shit if my tax dollars go to dick enlargement (for those who actually need it, the poor bastards) and viagra for those who need it (also, those poor bastards). But if birth control isn't free and accessible, a lot more of my tax dollars are going to go to the care of unwanted children (AGAIN, poor bastards). Sweden is a good country to look to when it comes to the issue of birth control. Look at how easy it is to get there, compared to here, and then compare to the unwanted birth rates.

                  But anyway, I'm still not sure about the gender reassignment thing. I suppose it's okay if doctors and psychiatrists give it the okay, that it's actually needed and would vastly improve the quality of life for someone.
                  Originally posted by Frosted
                  I knew he was committed as an actor but I think he went too far in his latest role as Princess Diana

                  Comment

                  • squeezyjohn
                    Member
                    • Jan 2008
                    • 2497

                    #10
                    Originally posted by wa3zrm View Post
                    OK, I can't resist this. Would the two dick surgery be functional or purely cosmetic? I would assume that a functional operation would cost much more than just a cosmetic attachment?
                    Definitely functional ... fully plumbed in to everything and with all the lifting capability of my present member!

                    Although this fantastic opportunity does raise it's own problems I suppose ... it would need to have an off-switch for "day-to-day" functions otherwise it would make a hell of a mess! Also - you need to think of where it's going to come from ... is it something they have a category for when you sign up for a donor card?
                    Squeezyjohn

                    Sometimes wrong and sometimes right .... but ALWAYS certain!!!

                    Comment

                    • squeezyjohn
                      Member
                      • Jan 2008
                      • 2497

                      #11
                      Originally posted by halocog View Post
                      Healthcare is so messed up. Penis pumps and viagra are perfectly fine, but birth control for women is scrutinized like it's the devil. Personally, I don't give a shit if my tax dollars go to dick enlargement (for those who actually need it, the poor bastards) and viagra for those who need it (also, those poor bastards). But if birth control isn't free and accessible, a lot more of my tax dollars are going to go to the care of unwanted children (AGAIN, poor bastards). Sweden is a good country to look to when it comes to the issue of birth control. Look at how easy it is to get there, compared to here, and then compare to the unwanted birth rates.

                      But anyway, I'm still not sure about the gender reassignment thing. I suppose it's okay if doctors and psychiatrists give it the okay, that it's actually needed and would vastly improve the quality of life for someone.
                      On a serious point ... we have pretty universal access to birth control over here on the NHS and the thought that a free country wouldn't prioritise it is frankly shocking.
                      Squeezyjohn

                      Sometimes wrong and sometimes right .... but ALWAYS certain!!!

                      Comment

                      • Snusdog
                        Member
                        • Jun 2008
                        • 6752

                        #12
                        Trojan slingshot rubbers...........you know.......for double boner fun

                        "Squeezy..........take a look at this issue of Playboy........and then see if you can knock that can off skell's head........ from 15 feet"
                        When it's my time to go, I want to die peacefully in my sleep, like my uncle did....... Not screaming in terror like his passengers

                        Comment

                        • wa3zrm
                          Member
                          • May 2009
                          • 4436

                          #13
                          Originally posted by squeezyjohn View Post
                          Definitely functional ...
                          This would bring peeing in the snow to a new art form!
                          If you have any problems with my posts or signature


                          Comment

                          • Gracie
                            Member
                            • Oct 2013
                            • 46

                            #14
                            and just where would that second penis be attached?


                            I can't believe this discussion even exists. You guys are nuts.
                            My God, it's full of stars!

                            Comment

                            • Gracie
                              Member
                              • Oct 2013
                              • 46

                              #15
                              speaking of nuts, would that new package include them as well?
                              My God, it's full of stars!

                              Comment

                              Related Topics

                              Collapse

                              Working...
                              X