The Onion: Area man defends what he believes re:Constitution

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • sgreger1
    Member
    • Mar 2009
    • 9451

    The Onion: Area man defends what he believes re:Constitution

    Even as Sgreger1, I find this funny. As it is very true in a lot of cases.
    -----------------------------




    Area Man Passionate Defender Of What He Imagines Constitution To Be


    ESCONDIDO, CA—Spurred by an administration he believes to be guilty of numerous transgressions, self-described American patriot Kyle Mortensen, 47, is a vehement defender of ideas he seems to think are enshrined in the U.S. Constitution and principles that brave men have fought and died for solely in his head.

    Kyle Mortensen would gladly give his life to protect what he says is the Constitution's very clear stance against birth control.

    "Our very way of life is under siege," said Mortensen, whose understanding of the Constitution derives not from a close reading of the document but from talk-show pundits, books by television personalities, and the limitless expanse of his own colorful imagination. "It's time for true Americans to stand up and protect the values that make us who we are."

    According to Mortensen—an otherwise mild-mannered husband, father, and small-business owner—the most serious threat to his fanciful version of the 222-year-old Constitution is the attempt by far-left "traitors" to strip it of its religious foundation.

    "Right there in the preamble, the authors make their priorities clear: 'one nation under God,'" said Mortensen, attributing to the Constitution a line from the Pledge of Allegiance, which itself did not include any reference to a deity until 1954. "Well, there's a reason they put that right at the top."

    "Men like Madison and Jefferson were moved by the ideals of Christianity, and wanted the United States to reflect those values as a Christian nation," continued Mortensen, referring to the "Father of the Constitution," James Madison, considered by many historians to be an atheist, and Thomas Jefferson, an Enlightenment-era thinker who rejected the divinity of Christ and was in France at the time the document was written.

    "The words on the page speak for themselves."
    According to sources who have read the nation's charter, the U.S. Constitution and its 27 amendments do not contain the word "God" or "Christ."

    Mortensen said his admiration for the loose assemblage of vague half-notions he calls the Constitution has only grown over time. He believes that each detail he has pulled from thin air—from prohibitions on sodomy and flag-burning, to mandatory crackdowns on immigrants, to the right of citizens not to have their hard-earned income confiscated in the form of taxes—has contributed to making it the best framework for governance "since the Ten Commandments."

    "And let's not forget that when the Constitution was ratified it brought freedom to every single American," Mortensen said.
    Mortensen's passion for safeguarding the elaborate fantasy world in which his conception of the Constitution resides is greatly respected by his likeminded friends and relatives, many of whom have been known to repeat his unfounded assertions verbatim when angered. Still, some friends and family members remain critical.

    "Dad's great, but listening to all that talk radio has put some weird ideas into his head," said daughter Samantha, a freshman at Reed College in Portland, OR. "He believes the Constitution allows the government to torture people and ban gay marriage, yet he doesn't even know that it guarantees universal health care."

    Mortensen told reporters that he'll fight until the bitter end for what he roughly supposes the Constitution to be. He acknowledged, however, that it might already be too late to win the battle.

    "The freedoms our Founding Fathers spilled their blood for are vanishing before our eyes," Mortensen said. "In under a year, a fascist, socialist regime has turned a proud democracy into a totalitarian state that will soon control every facet of American life."

    "Don't just take my word for it," Mortensen added. "Try reading a newspaper or watching the news sometime."
  • BardicDruid
    Member
    • Aug 2009
    • 72

    #2
    Whoa

    There is a principle which is a bar against all
    information, which is proof against all arguments
    and which cannot fail to keep a man in everlasting
    ignorance—
    that principle is contempt prior to investigation.
    Herbert Spencer

    Comment

    • texasmade
      Member
      • Jan 2009
      • 4159

      #3
      seperation of church and state...i wonder when we will go back to those days?

      Comment

      • VBSnus
        Member
        • Jul 2009
        • 532

        #4
        Originally posted by texasmade
        seperation of church and state...i wonder when we will go back to those days?
        When the religious right is gone and only the conservative right remains, we'll be a hell of a lot closer.

        Comment

        • texasmade
          Member
          • Jan 2009
          • 4159

          #5
          so pretty much never

          Comment

          • sgreger1
            Member
            • Mar 2009
            • 9451

            #6
            *in south park style redneck voice*

            Wut jew talkin bout. Dey tuk err religions!


            While I would also like to see the religious fanatic side be exercised from the corpse of the republican party, it wouldn't change anything. The left has too much of a hold on the youth and in hollywood/media etc.

            I think we are going to have to learn why big gov is bad the hard way like so many others have in the past.

            Comment

            • texasmade
              Member
              • Jan 2009
              • 4159

              #7
              we havent learned the hard way yet?

              Comment

              • VBSnus
                Member
                • Jul 2009
                • 532

                #8
                <embed src="http://www.theonion.com/content/themes/common/assets/onn_embed/embedded_player.swf"type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowScriptAccess="always" allowFullScreen="true" wmode="transparent" width="480" height="430"flashvars="image=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.theonion. com%2Fcontent%2Ffiles%2Fimages%2FOBAMA_TELEPROMPTER_ART ICLE_11_12.jpg&videoid=99262&title=Obama's%20Home%20Tel eprompter%20Malfunctions%20During%20Family%20Dinner"></embed>Obama's Home Teleprompter Malfunctions During Family Dinner

                Comment

                • sgreger1
                  Member
                  • Mar 2009
                  • 9451

                  #9
                  @VB


                  Lol that is outstanding. i love at the end how she's like "The president even sends his teleprompter alone for more low key diplomatic events."

                  Comment

                  • sgreger1
                    Member
                    • Mar 2009
                    • 9451

                    #10
                    Originally posted by texasmade
                    we havent learned the hard way yet?
                    If you notice the posts on this forum alone, or even read a newspaper, you will see that big government is being hailed as the only thing that can save us from the evil corporations.

                    Sad though that these same evil corporations now have their guys on most of the regulatory positions in gov anyways so giving gov more power to regulate is just giving big corps more power to regulate AGAINST the competition.
                    Look at HC reform for example, 3200 just helps big insurance companies, but is being hailed as big government saving the day and bringing "meaningfull reform" to us helpless citizens.

                    Comment

                    • VBSnus
                      Member
                      • Jul 2009
                      • 532

                      #11
                      Originally posted by sgreger1
                      Originally posted by texasmade
                      we havent learned the hard way yet?
                      If you notice the posts on this forum alone, or even read a newspaper, you will see that big government is being hailed as the only thing that can save us from the evil corporations.
                      Wrong. A regulating government free of lobbying and PACs is the only thing that can save us from the evil corporations.

                      If you notice the posts on this forum alone, or talk to anyone about it, you will find that most people are not Republican or Democrat anymore. Nearly everyone I meet is libertarian leaning right or left, or fiscal conservative/social liberal nowadays.

                      That whole "I'm not Republican, I'm Independent" thing goes both ways.

                      Comment

                      • sgreger1
                        Member
                        • Mar 2009
                        • 9451

                        #12
                        Originally posted by VBSnus
                        Wrong. A regulating government free of lobbying and PACs is the only thing that can save us from the evil corporations.

                        If you notice the posts on this forum alone, or talk to anyone about it, you will find that most people are not Republican or Democrat anymore. Nearly everyone I meet is libertarian leaning right or left, or fiscal conservative/social liberal nowadays.

                        That whole "I'm not Republican, I'm Independent" thing goes both ways.

                        That is because more and more people are feeling disenfranchised by both parties. The average American doens't have anyone that really represents them so they just say i'm an indi or libertarian.

                        Your right, regulation is key, but only regulation that sets reasonable ground rules for the free market to operate within. Not the regulation we see today where ex goldman sachs employees, fed reserve chairmans' etc are in regulatory positions. They end up ****ing us so that the banks can continue getting rich.


                        Look at Glass Stiegel, it was repealed for Grahm Leach Blailey under Clinton. This is part of what paved the way for these banks to seek income in new more exotic markets (risky loans). We NEED regulation, but not regulation that just helps the larger companies but hurts it's competitors.


                        At the end of the day, most of America's problems come down the fact that we need to get rid of the lobbyists. Obama promised he would do this but I have seen no sign of him following through as of yet. If we could cut down the lobbying structure, it would be of great benefit to America in all sectors.



                        EDIT:


                        From the most recent snuson political poll:


                        What is your political leaning
                        Conservative(Not necessarily Republican)
                        37% [ 14 ]
                        Liberal(Not Necessarily Democrat)
                        27% [ 10 ]
                        Other( Myself)
                        35% [ 13 ]

                        Total Votes : 37

                        Comment

                        Working...
                        X