Don't Rip Off a CVS!

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • wa3zrm
    Member
    • May 2009
    • 4436

    Don't Rip Off a CVS!

    Source: http://www.suntimes.com/news/metro/2...lift10.article


    Anthony Kyser didn't have money for the tubes of toothpaste he stuffed in his jacket before he walked out of a Little Village CVS store Saturday morning.
    He paid with his life, instead.
    Chased out of the store and down a litter-strewn alley shortly before 11 a.m., the 35-year-old unemployed barber was strangled to death by a CVS employee who had seen him shoplifting, officials said.
    Witnesses said Kyser, of the 1400 block of South Hamlin, cried, "I can't breathe, I can't breathe!" as the CVS worker held him in a chokehold for what they thought was several minutes. Three other men attempted to restrain him in the alley behind the 2600 block of South Pulaski, the witnesses said.
    The medical examiner ruled Kyser's death a homicide, saying an autopsy showed he had been strangled, but police said Sunday the employee who killed him won't be charged.
    Police are treating the death as "accidental," Chicago Police spokesman Daniel O'Brien said.
    That's a decision Kyser's outraged family can't understand.
    "Why would you kill someone over toothpaste?" his ex-wife, Ann Balboa, said through tears Sunday.
    "Why would you even chase them, and how is this not murder -- it doesn't make sense."
    Kyser's family said that though he had served prison time for drug convictions and had a drug problem and "his ups and downs," nothing he had done came close to justifying his death.
    They also said they want a full investigation into claims -- made by two witnesses to the Chicago Sun-Times -- that an off-duty Chicago cop was at the scene and had drawn her weapon on Kyser before he died.
    Chicago Police say there is no reference to an off-duty officer in their report.
    The witnesses, whose homes back onto the alley where Kyser died and who asked not to be identified, say the officer announced herself, pointed her weapon at a bleeding Kyser and told him to stop resisting the CVS employee and other men who were holding him down.
    When he continued to struggle, she holstered her weapon, got in her car and made a phone call, the witnesses said.
    Chicago Police spokesman John Mirabelli said Kyser was unconscious when officers arrived at the scene at 10:52 a.m. Police Lt. Maureen Biggane said the probe continues, adding that "we have no indication of CPD involvement." She said camera footage is being reviewed and urged witnesses to contact detectives.
    Initially described as in "fair-to-serious" condition, Kyser was declared dead 45 minutes later at Mount Sinai Hospital, according to the medical examiner's office.
    Staff at the store declined to comment Sunday, but CVS spokesman Michael DeAngelis said the company was investigating "the unfortunate incident involving a suspected shoplifter who fled our store."
    The Independent Police Review Authority is not investigating, spokesman Curtis Tarver said.
    There were 15 thefts in the 2600 block of South Pulaski in the first four months of 2010, statistics show. Witnesses said they have previously seen CVS employees tackle shoplifters.
    Balboa says Kyser's family plans to sue. "He was a loving stepfather to my three sons," she said. "They've taken away my kids' pops, and you don't do that.
    If you have any problems with my posts or signature


  • tom502
    Member
    • Feb 2009
    • 8985

    #2
    Why would someone risk their life, or jail, for a dollar tube of toothpaste?

    Comment

    • deebocools
      Member
      • Nov 2008
      • 661

      #3
      why would someone strangle someone because they took toothpaste? After all, I wouldn't assume I'd be risking my life either.

      If I was the employee and actually cared, I'd just get the merchandise back and black-list him. This isn't eye for an eye it's toothpaste for a life

      Comment

      • deebocools
        Member
        • Nov 2008
        • 661

        #4
        and it's also ridiculous that the strangler isn't being charged...with anything at all! Not even assault

        Comment

        • texasmade
          Member
          • Jan 2009
          • 4159

          #5
          Originally posted by deebocools View Post
          why would someone strangle someone because they took toothpaste? After all, I wouldn't assume I'd be risking my life either.

          If I was the employee and actually cared, I'd just get the merchandise back and black-list him. This isn't eye for an eye it's toothpaste for a life
          some stores tell employees not to chase or stop anyone shoplifting once tey have left the store...sounds like this will be on the national news before to long

          Comment

          • sgreger1
            Member
            • Mar 2009
            • 9451

            #6
            Where I live, if you jack a safeway or something they can't even legally pursue you once you leave the store property. This is the stupidest thing i've ever heard, I would organize a national boycott over CVS. How can they not charge him? It was toothpaste for God's sake, and the employee wasn't losing any money on it, why did he care so much? I wouldn't even break a sweat to catch some guy stealing toothpaste.

            If hes not being charged there has to be more to this story, did the jacker fight back, did he kill him in self defense? If the family wants them charged they have to charge them this is nonesense.

            Comment

            • tom502
              Member
              • Feb 2009
              • 8985

              #7
              I agree it's crazy that this went so far as to have the guy killed, but it's also crazy to risk arrest and put yourself in a situation just for toothpaste. I am sure there are social services for the poor that would have given him some toothpaste. If some bum stopped me at the store and asked me to buy him some toothpaste, I would.

              Comment

              • WickedKitchen
                Member
                • Nov 2009
                • 2528

                #8
                There's got to be more to the story. Seems to me that there was a fight between them. It read like the employee chased him down, tacked him then immediately went straight to choking. I suspect it went down a little differently. There were also witnesses to some degree that haven't made a detailed statement.

                I don't think anyone should be killed for stealing something like that. Run down, thrown to the ground and tuned up real good sure, but this seems excessive force. Now if the thief was fighting back and beating on the other person it might be a different story.

                Comment

                • AtreyuKun
                  Member
                  • Aug 2009
                  • 1223

                  #9
                  That's what you call a company man right there. Even Wal-Mart doesn't give a damn about something that small.

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  X