U.S. government lauds, funds 9/11 mosque

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • wa3zrm
    Member
    • May 2009
    • 4436

    U.S. government lauds, funds 9/11 mosque

    U.S. government lauds, funds 9/11 mosque

    Census pays $582,000, State Dept. praises terror 'front' in video

    Posted: May 18, 2010
    9:40 pm Eastern


    WASHINGTON – The federal government is financially supporting and officially embracing a radical mosque in the Washington suburbs that is directly connected to al-Qaida and the 9/11 attacks as well as other terrorism.
    The Census Bureau has signed a two-year, $582,000 lease with Dar al-Hijrah Islamic Center, where top al-Qaida recruiter Anwar Awlaki ministered to the Pentagon hijackers and the Fort Hood terrorist as a mosque leader.
    Meanwhile, the State Department is taking diplomatic trainees on tours of the large Falls Church, Va., mosque, while featuring it in a video as a model depiction of Islam in America – even as the Department of Homeland Security warns that it is a terrorist front.
    According to recently declassified internal reports obtained by the respected Investigative Project on Terrorism, Homeland Security has warned federal agents that Dar al-Hijrah is "operating as a front for Hamas" and "has been under numerous investigations for financing and proving (sic) aid and comfort to bad orgs and members."
    WND has learned authorities are also investigating the mosque for child molestation and credit card fraud, following reports of mysterious Dar al-Hijrah line-item charges appearing on the statements of local individuals not even connected to the mosque.



    Read more: http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=155233
    If you have any problems with my posts or signature


  • tom502
    Member
    • Feb 2009
    • 8985

    #2
    There is an agenda here, and the people in charge are not in favor of the citizens.

    Comment

    • sgreger1
      Member
      • Mar 2009
      • 9451

      #3
      Lol, is this is real than WOW. I don't even know what to say.

      Comment

      • lxskllr
        Member
        • Sep 2007
        • 13435

        #4
        Originally posted by sgreger1 View Post
        Lol, is this is real than WOW. I don't even know what to say.
        Looking over the site, WND's journalism is HIGHLY questionable. They appear to bend truths, and use creative interpretation to sensationalize stories. I'd liken them to the National Enquirer. The stories have elements of truth, but the real story isn't as interesting as they report.

        Comment

        • LaZeR
          Member
          • Oct 2009
          • 3994

          #5
          Originally posted by lxskllr View Post
          Looking over the site, WND's journalism is HIGHLY questionable. They appear to bend truths, and use creative interpretation to sensationalize stories. I'd liken them to the National Enquirer. The stories have elements of truth, but the real story isn't as interesting as they report.
          Word. I think them folk be sociopath's or something doing that there reporting.

          Comment

          • danielan
            Member
            • Apr 2010
            • 1514

            #6
            Originally posted by lxskllr View Post
            They appear to bend truths, and use creative interpretation to sensationalize stories.
            When you say it like that, they sound mainstream.

            Comment

            • lxskllr
              Member
              • Sep 2007
              • 13435

              #7
              Originally posted by danielan View Post
              When you say it like that, they sound mainstream.
              They take it in a different direction. WND is on the conspiratorial side, and wants you to think the government is out to get you. Mainstream media is on the nancy boy side, and wants you to think the world's out to get you. The truth is somewhere in between.

              Comment

              • sgreger1
                Member
                • Mar 2009
                • 9451

                #8
                Lol, I was on the wayback machine from archive.org earlier and was checking out Alex Jones infowars.com from 1999 to recall how sure he was the world was going to end, and I stumbled on some link he had to WND claiming that NATO was going to take over after y2k and how they had documents or something lol.


                WND is better than a tabloid but they do tend to sensationalize news that would otherwise be unremarkable.

                Comment

                • Owens187
                  Member
                  • Sep 2009
                  • 1547

                  #9
                  Originally posted by lxskllr View Post
                  Looking over the site, WND's journalism is HIGHLY questionable. They appear to bend truths, and use creative interpretation to sensationalize stories. I'd liken them to the National Enquirer. The stories have elements of truth, but the real story isn't as interesting as they report.
                  This.

                  Comment

                  Related Topics

                  Collapse

                  Working...
                  X