More good News for Democrats-Sharron Angle-R-Nev-abolish-SSN-Harry Reid a shoe in

[Joe234]

Sharron Angle-R-Nev. wants to abolish Social Security and the Department of Education, for instance.

Read more at the Washington Examiner: http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/op...#ixzz0qKGQUHKk

[StuKlu]

Harry Reid is toast as is the Democrat Party, can't wait 'til November

[sgreger1]

Yah Reid is toast, Angle could say she wants to abolish black people and would still be more popular with both parties than Reid. This november, if your an incumbent on either side, YOUR OUTTA HERE.

[Joe234]

I predict the Repubs will lose when Obama gets credit for an economic turnaround
and the resolution of the Gulf Oil Leak.

[LaZeR]

Joe, Just one quick question. Do you stay up late 'touching' yourself on election night?

/Just curious.

[sgreger1]

I predict the Repubs will lose when Obama gets credit for an economic turnaround
and the resolution of the Gulf Oil Leak.

Lol Joe, you must not have lived in America too long. People don't think like that, it's just constant knee jerk reactions and populism gone mad. The economy will turn around eventually on it's own, but the odds of it getting all that great before november are slim to none, and by 2012 a 50/50 change. And as far as the gulf leak, it has already been rated as worse than Katrina and they dropped the ball, bp and the feds.



Dude did you watch the daily show last night? The whole show was dedicated to absolutely slaughtering Obama about the oil spill, then it went on to make fun of how obama says everything is "complicated" and that's why it's not getting done right, he says it about everything from healthcare to the oil spill to everything else. It was hilarious. Just saying, I wouldn't expect Obama to gain much from the gulf oil leak incident, I think that's fair to say. If the economy improves than he'll get realected for sure because people will somehow think he magically fixed it or something.

[Joe234]

Can you ever imagine an accident happening where no one gets the blame?
Certainly not these days. Accidents will happen.

[sgreger1]

It was a classic case of soldiers were ordered to go into a sticky situation, and once there they found themselves defending their lives so they do what soldiers do best and pull the trigger. The rest of the crowd that was trying to kill them is one lucky bunch, if it were me on that ship and I just got beat with a pole or stabbed, I couldn't stop at killing just 6, I would have put that whole ship to sleep. So I think it's amazing restraint that they only killed 6, but at the same time, why did it take shooting 6 people to get the crowd to back off? Likely after the first one everyone froze and chilled out, and the soldiers went on to pop a few more for good measure, which is wrong. I wasn't there so I don't know.