This is all too much, We are quite simply ****ed.....
Kagan "It’s Fine If The Law Bans Books Because Government Won’t Really Enforce it"
Collapse
X
-
I'm scared of her.
Something reptilian and duplicitous oozes out of her.
Like she takes pleasure out of caressing someone's cheek with one hand while simultaneously burying a knife in their liver with the other.
I trust my instincts. If I saw her in a dark alley I'd run. It's the calm, soft spoken one's with forked tongues that can be dangerous.
Nothing about her argument has logical merit in that clip.
God help us.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Bigblue1 View PostYeah stuklu, but Mcasshole would be just as bad. different puppets same master....
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by bsd777 View PostThe argument, at it's essence was over freedom of speech. The government (Kagan and Obama administration via FCC) argued an organization could not distribute a video documentary, they took issue with. Kagan argued (unsuccessfully) that the government has a right to prohibit a political organization from distributing a documentary. The justices asked if the election law Kagan sought to uphold, also allowed the govt to ban other forms of media, including a book. It was a theoretical argument. No specific book was mentioned.
http://blog.heritage.org/2010/01/21/...f-free-speech/
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...003943_pf.html
Comment
-
-
Apparently at the instant of the O's inauguration political dissent abruptly switched from the noblest pursuit of the forces of light and reason to the traitorous demagoguery of hate-mongering fascists. The left can dish the vilest calumny out with gusto as witnessed by eight-tenths of a decade of hysterical Bush hatred but they scream with indignation when they or their anointed golden boy are on the receiving end of criticism. Hence their efforts to quash a documentary as detailed above and their ongoing attempts to use the Fairness Doctrine to shut down conservative talk radio. Bunch of pansies.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Darwin View PostApparently at the instant of the O's inauguration political dissent abruptly switched from the noblest pursuit of the forces of light and reason to the traitorous demagoguery of hate-mongering fascists. The left can dish the vilest calumny out with gusto as witnessed by eight-tenths of a decade of hysterical Bush hatred but they scream with indignation when they or their anointed golden boy are on the receiving end of criticism. Hence their efforts to quash a documentary as detailed above and their ongoing attempts to use the Fairness Doctrine to shut down conservative talk radio. Bunch of pansies.
Comment
-
-
Last I checked, Europe still doesn't ban books or DVDs for the most part. I can think of some examples where they did, but it's not a common enough practice to bother me. Also, there's Canada just up north. Of course, for all the folks on here who instantly think gulags the second someone mentions the slightest hint of socialism, no you guys are screwed.
Comment
-
-
I say a big BS.
I do not look at the founders as great. They had no concept of middle class or working class. These are the people that only wanted wealthy white land owners voting.
I say **** them all, they are just as bad as what we have now.
Time for something new...without wealth as the most important thing.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by dxh View PostI say a big BS.
I do not look at the founders as great. They had no concept of middle class or working class. These are the people that only wanted wealthy white land owners voting.
I say **** them all, they are just as bad as what we have now.
Time for something new...without wealth as the most important thing.
But my friend, you forget the golden rule: He who has the gold, makes the rule.
Comment
-
Comment