Kagan "It’s Fine If The Law Bans Books Because Government Won’t Really Enforce it"

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Bigblue1
    Banned Users
    • Dec 2008
    • 3923

    #16
    This is all too much, We are quite simply ****ed.....

    Comment

    • bakerbarber
      Member
      • Jun 2008
      • 1947

      #17
      I'm scared of her.

      Something reptilian and duplicitous oozes out of her.

      Like she takes pleasure out of caressing someone's cheek with one hand while simultaneously burying a knife in their liver with the other.

      I trust my instincts. If I saw her in a dark alley I'd run. It's the calm, soft spoken one's with forked tongues that can be dangerous.

      Nothing about her argument has logical merit in that clip.

      God help us.

      Comment

      • StuKlu
        Member
        • Feb 2010
        • 1192

        #18
        Elections have consequences. How's all that hope and change working out for everybody?

        Comment

        • Bigblue1
          Banned Users
          • Dec 2008
          • 3923

          #19
          Yeah stuklu, but Mcasshole would be just as bad. different puppets same master....

          Comment

          • StuKlu
            Member
            • Feb 2010
            • 1192

            #20
            Originally posted by Bigblue1 View Post
            Yeah stuklu, but Mcasshole would be just as bad. different puppets same master....
            No actually McAsshole would have been worse in the long run as all of this crap would be happening much slower. At least with what we have the rate of change is so fast that there is still a chance to save the republic as we the people are waking up.

            Comment

            • lxskllr
              Member
              • Sep 2007
              • 13435

              #21
              Originally posted by bsd777 View Post
              The argument, at it's essence was over freedom of speech. The government (Kagan and Obama administration via FCC) argued an organization could not distribute a video documentary, they took issue with. Kagan argued (unsuccessfully) that the government has a right to prohibit a political organization from distributing a documentary. The justices asked if the election law Kagan sought to uphold, also allowed the govt to ban other forms of media, including a book. It was a theoretical argument. No specific book was mentioned.

              http://blog.heritage.org/2010/01/21/...f-free-speech/
              http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...003943_pf.html
              Ah, ok. Well, we won one. They tried to chip off too big a chunk at once. You gotta nibble away at the Constitution to make long term progress overturning it's principles.

              Comment

              • Darwin
                Member
                • Mar 2010
                • 1372

                #22
                Apparently at the instant of the O's inauguration political dissent abruptly switched from the noblest pursuit of the forces of light and reason to the traitorous demagoguery of hate-mongering fascists. The left can dish the vilest calumny out with gusto as witnessed by eight-tenths of a decade of hysterical Bush hatred but they scream with indignation when they or their anointed golden boy are on the receiving end of criticism. Hence their efforts to quash a documentary as detailed above and their ongoing attempts to use the Fairness Doctrine to shut down conservative talk radio. Bunch of pansies.

                Comment

                • tom502
                  Member
                  • Feb 2009
                  • 8985

                  #23
                  This country is going down FAST.

                  Comment

                  • truthwolf1
                    Member
                    • Oct 2008
                    • 2696

                    #24
                    This is a bad blind date!

                    Comment

                    • shikitohno
                      Member
                      • Jul 2009
                      • 1156

                      #25
                      Originally posted by Darwin View Post
                      Apparently at the instant of the O's inauguration political dissent abruptly switched from the noblest pursuit of the forces of light and reason to the traitorous demagoguery of hate-mongering fascists. The left can dish the vilest calumny out with gusto as witnessed by eight-tenths of a decade of hysterical Bush hatred but they scream with indignation when they or their anointed golden boy are on the receiving end of criticism. Hence their efforts to quash a documentary as detailed above and their ongoing attempts to use the Fairness Doctrine to shut down conservative talk radio. Bunch of pansies.
                      Well, you can't ignore that Republicans did the same hysterical act when Bush was being criticized. Still, they didn't try and pull this crap. If it ever gets to the point where the government can ban books or any media they don't like, that'll just serve as the final bit of proof that I need to get the hell off the ship before it totally sinks.

                      Comment

                      • Darwin
                        Member
                        • Mar 2010
                        • 1372

                        #26
                        I sympathize entirely but just where the heck can one flee that isn't as bad if not worse?

                        Comment

                        • shikitohno
                          Member
                          • Jul 2009
                          • 1156

                          #27
                          Last I checked, Europe still doesn't ban books or DVDs for the most part. I can think of some examples where they did, but it's not a common enough practice to bother me. Also, there's Canada just up north. Of course, for all the folks on here who instantly think gulags the second someone mentions the slightest hint of socialism, no you guys are screwed.

                          Comment

                          • Darwin
                            Member
                            • Mar 2010
                            • 1372

                            #28
                            Canada might be okay except for their rather pinched ideas about freedom of speech and the fact that they are even more hostile to tobacco users than the U.S.

                            Comment

                            • dxh
                              Member
                              • Jun 2010
                              • 340

                              #29
                              I say a big BS.
                              I do not look at the founders as great. They had no concept of middle class or working class. These are the people that only wanted wealthy white land owners voting.
                              I say **** them all, they are just as bad as what we have now.
                              Time for something new...without wealth as the most important thing.

                              Comment

                              • sgreger1
                                Member
                                • Mar 2009
                                • 9451

                                #30
                                Originally posted by dxh View Post
                                I say a big BS.
                                I do not look at the founders as great. They had no concept of middle class or working class. These are the people that only wanted wealthy white land owners voting.
                                I say **** them all, they are just as bad as what we have now.
                                Time for something new...without wealth as the most important thing.

                                But my friend, you forget the golden rule: He who has the gold, makes the rule.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X