Keith Olbermann: "Worst Person In The World" - 07/06/10 - Rush Limbaugh -Overt Racist

[Joe234]

Keith Olbermann: "Worst Person In The World" - 07/06/10 - Rush Limbaugh

--

[foxb86]

Keith Olbermann: "Worst Person In The World" - 07/06/10 - Rush Limbaugh

--

pot meet kettle. they are both biased jackballs who slant everything to work with their own point of view.

[justintempler]

[LaZeR]

/Thread.

[razzor7]

What a fool (obviously), Obama could have won that election if he was a native american transvestite. It was handed to the democrats.

[Big L]

What a fool (obviously), Obama could have won that election if he was a native american transvestite. It was handed to the democrats.

I agree, there was so much anti-Bush sentiment that the Republicans didn't have a chance.

And yeah, the above is pretty much the pot calling the kettle black, both are biased in different ways. I consider them entertainers and don't take either seriously.

[razzor7]

Anti-Bush sentiment is all well and good, but I think the repubs might have had a chance if their ticket wasn't an extremely funny joke. Though props to them for throwing away an election in the interest of comedy.

[dxh]

I really hate most of our government officials. None of them could hold a real job.

[MrSnusNSnuff]

Yes they are both biased, but I'd prefer Rush. He's more entertaining.

He also freely explains his philosophy and logic, and how it applies to real-world situations. Even though you may or may not agree with him, this is something liberal commentators do not do. They don't tell you or demonstrate how socialism will work. They simply counterattack Conservatives and take sound bytes out of context.

[Joe234]

Anti-Bush sentiment is all well and good, but I think the repubs might have had a chance if their ticket wasn't an extremely funny joke. Though props to them for throwing away an election in the interest of comedy.

Bush deserved it. And you're correct. The Repubs may have had a chance if
they hadn't run a former maverick turned Repubicrat with the former
Half Governor of Alaska.

Bush was the worst President in recent history.

Invasion of Iraq- No WMDs
Katrina
Allowed 911 to happen on his watch ( along with Dick Chaney)
Former Baseball team owner turner President from his buddies in Big Business
( not to mention his daddy's name)
A dunce to boot

[razzor7]

Allowed 911 to happen on his watch ( along with Dick Chaney)

I think you mean orchestrated.

[bsd777]

Bush deserved it. And you're correct. The Repubs may have had a chance if
they hadn't run a former maverick turned Repubicrat with the former
Half Governor of Alaska.

Bush was the worst President in recent history.

Invasion of Iraq- No WMDs
Katrina
Allowed 911 to happen on his watch ( along with Dick Chaney)
Former Baseball team owner turner President from his buddies in Big Business
( not to mention his daddy's name)
A dunce to boot

OMFG. Joe, does it hurt when you try to think? Rush Limbaugh is often maligned and mischaracterized by the mainstream media, in spite of or perhaps because he is brilliant and usually right. Limbaugh is consistent in support of conservatism, not a man or a party. Olbermann is a sycophant, Obama, democratic party, GE shill. He is an idiot, who's positions often lack sound reason or logic.

Bush was a great president, until he implemented the first bailouts. He was undeservedly, frequently maligned in the mainstream media, so often that much of the populace began to repeat and believe the digs. Obama is, and history will show, to be the single worst president of all time, contrary to what MSNBC, ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN et al continue to propagate. McCain was a liberal RINO, who failed to inspire confidence, but Palin was almost able to make up for his deficiencies.

How do you know there where no WMDs in Iraq? Are you sure they didn't enter Jordan as part of the pre-invasion convoy? Does a lack of WMDs make Bush a lier or a bad person? Do you, the democratic party or the mainstream propagandists understand the difference between being wrong and being a lier? It's important. Telling a lie is to knowingly misrepresent the truth. Obama does this on a weekly, if not daily, basis. Why is it the MSM has never pointed out a single Obama lie, but continuously implied or eroniously stated Bush did, when in fact, he never lied, not once.

According to most Louisianans, Bush's response to Katrina was far better than Obama's response to the oil gusher, but there are important differences. The federal government was never meant to be the first responder to natural disasters. This is the job of local and state authorities. In the case of Katrina, local and state response where inadequet, as they were orcestarted by an incompetent DEMOCRAT Governor and mayor.

Bill Clinton "allowed" 911, by not responding, or inadequately responding to previous terrorist attacks, crippling the ability of the CIA and FBI to work cooperate, weakening the CIA, failing to kill Osama, failing to take the Sudans offer to turn him over to us etc.....

Isn't it funny how stupid conservatives all are, but liberals/statists are all brilliant, so we are constantly told. Contrary to main stream media conventional wisdom, I've concluded Obama is either a complete idiot or he is intentionally destroying this once great country. Bush successfully ran a business/baseball team, which is far more than can be said about Obama, who has never accomplished or run anything in his entire life.

Give some thought to turning the tv off, every once in a while, and reading a book.

[lxskllr]

Give some thought to turning the tv off, every once in a while, and reading a book.

Really? I honestly don't have the patience to go through all this crap. Some points...

Rush is a drug addicted, hypocritical idiot. I wouldn't trust him to wipe his own ass properly, much less anything else. He's a political Howard Stern with half the intelligence, and none of the comedy.

Bush was anything but a great president. There weren't any WMDs in Iraq, and the "evidence" was either manufactured outright, or spun into something it wasn't.

No one "allowed" 9-11. Shit happens. We learned, and moved on. It was an unprecedented attack, executed in an unorthodox style. It won't happen again.

[LaZeR]

OMFG. Joe, does it hurt when you try to think? Rush Limbaugh is often maligned and mischaracterized by the mainstream media, in spite of or perhaps because he is brilliant and usually right. Limbaugh is consistent in support of conservatism, not a man or a party. Olbermann is a sycophant, Obama, democratic party, GE shill. He is an idiot, who's positions often lack sound reason or logic.

Bush was a great president, until he implemented the first bailouts. He was undeservedly, frequently maligned in the mainstream media, so often that much of the populace began to repeat and believe the digs. Obama is, and history will show, to be the single worst president of all time, contrary to what MSNBC, ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN et al continue to propagate. McCain was a liberal RINO, who failed to inspire confidence, but Palin was almost able to make up for his deficiencies.

How do you know there where no WMDs in Iraq? Are you sure they didn't enter Jordan as part of the pre-invasion convoy? Does a lack of WMDs make Bush a lier or a bad person? Do you, the democratic party or the mainstream propagandists understand the difference between being wrong and being a lier? It's important. Telling a lie is to knowingly misrepresent the truth. Obama does this on a weekly, if not daily, basis. Why is it the MSM has never pointed out a single Obama lie, but continuously implied or eroniously stated Bush did, when in fact, he never lied, not once.

According to most Louisianans, Bush's response to Katrina was far better than Obama's response to the oil gusher, but there are important differences. The federal government was never meant to be the first responder to natural disasters. This is the job of local and state authorities. In the case of Katrina, local and state response where inadequet, as they were orcestarted by an incompetent DEMOCRAT Governor and mayor.

Bill Clinton "allowed" 911, by not responding, or inadequately responding to previous terrorist attacks, crippling the ability of the CIA and FBI to work cooperate, weakening the CIA, failing to kill Osama, failing to take the Sudans offer to turn him over to us etc.....

Isn't it funny how stupid conservatives all are, but liberals/statists are all brilliant, so we are constantly told. Contrary to main stream media conventional wisdom, I've concluded Obama is either a complete idiot or he is intentionally destroying this once great country. Bush successfully ran a business/baseball team, which is far more than can be said about Obama, who has never accomplished or run anything in his entire life.

Give some thought to turning the tv off, every once in a while, and reading a book.

I really hate politics these days but have to give this a

+1

and yea, I voted for GW 2x and would vote for him again if he could/would run for office. He did a hell of a lot better job than Obama and actually protected our freedoms rather then trading them in for "Change in our pockets.... If we're lucky.".

[GoVegan]

Republicans are very forgiving with people in their own party!