Obama Justice Department declines to prosecute voter intimidation

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • bsd777
    Member
    • Nov 2009
    • 261

    #1

    Obama Justice Department declines to prosecute voter intimidation

    Another story the MSM doesn't want to cover.

    According to the former lead prosecutor, the Justice Department forced him to drop, the most clear cut case of voter intimidation he has ever seen. The former prosecutor alleges the Justice department did not wish to pursue the case because the suspects were black and the victims white.

    http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010...-panther-case/
  • tom502
    Member
    • Feb 2009
    • 8985

    #2
    Sad, but it seems Obama would rather side with racists of the Black Panthers, and the Mexican Cartel, against the side of American citzens.

    Comment

    • bsd777
      Member
      • Nov 2009
      • 261

      #3
      Originally posted by tom502 View Post
      Sad, but it seems Obama would rather side with racists of the Black Panthers, and the Mexican Cartel, against the side of American citzens.
      indeed

      Comment

      • Jimbob_Rebel
        Member
        • Jun 2010
        • 169

        #4
        "This week, Justice Department whistleblower J. Christian Adams came forward with damning public testimony about how Obama officials believe "civil rights law should not be enforced in a race-neutral manner, and should never be enforced against blacks or other national minorities.""

        http://vdare.com/malkin/100708_black_racism.htm

        Comment

        • tom502
          Member
          • Feb 2009
          • 8985

          #5
          I think if the nation lasts till 2012, it will be a long long time before we have another "black" president. Obama has ruined it for any future candidates, with his anti-American agendas, and his anti-White bias, plus the whole political arena now is all about race, PC extremism, and blatant bias. We as a nation have no need for that, and should reject it.

          Comment

          • bipolarbear1968
            Member
            • Mar 2010
            • 1074

            #6
            With that said, Tom- I think if you're going to be "commander in chief", you should at least have some military background.

            Comment

            • tom502
              Member
              • Feb 2009
              • 8985

              #7
              I agree too. I have always thought that. The commander in cheif should have some military service, and I don't mean Black Panthers.

              Comment

              • LaZeR
                Member
                • Oct 2009
                • 3994

                #8
                Originally posted by tom502 View Post
                I agree too. I have always thought that. The commander in chief should have some military service, and I don't mean Black Panthers.
                Agreed.

                Comment

                • myuserid
                  Member
                  • Jun 2010
                  • 1645

                  #9
                  This is the guy Eric Holder sides with.

                  Comment

                  • LaZeR
                    Member
                    • Oct 2009
                    • 3994

                    #10
                    Scary shit. At least there is transparency other than the MSM reporting on this. Not like Osama is trying to hide it too much.

                    Comment

                    • truthwolf1
                      Member
                      • Oct 2008
                      • 2696

                      #11
                      The clash between the commission and the Justice Department has its origins in an election day incident in which two members of the New Black Panther Party, one of whom was carrying a nightstick, were captured on videotape standing outside a polling station in Philadelphia. According to a witness, the Panthers shouted racial slurs; one said, presumably to a white voter:

                      "Now you will see what it is like to be ruled by the black man, cracker."

                      Where is the liberal outrage? oh, forgot. Hypocrites and WHITE GUILT.

                      Comment

                      • deadohsky
                        Member
                        • Nov 2009
                        • 625

                        #12
                        This is a little ridiculous.

                        PS: What's with the term 'cracker'? Maybe i'm just ignorant about the history of the term in relation to whites, but i don't see how being called a cracker would offend anyone, especially as a racial slur.

                        Comment

                        • tom502
                          Member
                          • Feb 2009
                          • 8985

                          #13
                          Cracker, which should be reffered to as the c-word, is, or should be, just as much as offensive racial slur as the n-word. The term is related to slavery, with the evil honky slave master, as a whip cracker, he cracks the whip, that oppresses the poor oppresed African Americans. So, trying to stir up anti-honky hate, the black racists, use this c-word, to allude all their problems, and their distresses is all because of the evil honky "cracker" keeping them down, forcing lil' Dejuan to sell crack and rob his local liquor store.

                          When the media, and the government, can stop their anti European American bias and agendas, and point the accusing finger of racism equally at the Black Panthers, and the Nation of Islam, and La Raza, with equal scorn for the KKK, then we will have at least moved somewhat towards racial equality, but as it stands today, honky is not wanted, and the media and government behind-kisses and panders to the anti-white racists and bigots.

                          Comment

                          • truthwolf1
                            Member
                            • Oct 2008
                            • 2696

                            #14
                            Originally posted by deadohsky View Post
                            This is a little ridiculous.

                            PS: What's with the term 'cracker'? Maybe i'm just ignorant about the history of the term in relation to whites, but i don't see how being called a cracker would offend anyone, especially as a racial slur.
                            Why dont you try to imagine if you reversed the situation with militant "Nazi SKins" waving battons at old black women in front of a voting station and yelling out, "Now you will see what it is like to be ruled by a white man, ni@#$r."

                            Comment

                            • deadohsky
                              Member
                              • Nov 2009
                              • 625

                              #15
                              To clarify, what i was referring to as ridiculous is the double standards with racism. I'm all for racial pride but it does not need to be hateful.

                              Thanks for the clarification tom, that makes more sense.

                              Comment

                              Related Topics

                              Collapse

                              Working...
                              X