Originally posted by Roo
View Post
I read a very interesting book on this subject, which spoke mainly from a historical (and non-political) perspective, and a big part of the book was about the evolution of head-ware and garb of those in the middle east. It was called "2,000 years of the middle east" or something along those lines. Anyways, it's point was that styles have changed a lot in the middle east for a plethora of reasons, almost none of those reasons being religious, but they all maintained the general concept of covering either the face and neck or entire body because well, um, IT'S THE ****ING DESERT. Even in the army they issue us "muslim" headdresses and gear (even terrorist masks like bank robbers use!) because it is so efficient. When there is that much dry heat and hot sun beating down, you don't want it on your neck or anywhere around your face. It's very efficient and is a low cost way of saving yourself from the heat, almost any rag will do. Plus, for those who don't know, the sand storms in that region are killer. The worst I ever had was when the chinooks would land 20m away to pick us up, and the blades would kick the sand up to 100mph onto the back of your neck, and we were in fully bloused (tucked in) combat fatigues . It's like razor blades. The middle east experiences sand storms like you saw in that movie "The Mummy", they are literally brick walls of sand, and only an idiot would be caught outside with western clothing.
Also, we must realize that (at least for men), the headdress that makes someone look like a terrorist actually has a deep cultural significance. For example, those who have been on pilgrimage wear a different style/colored headdress than those who have not. It's like a status symbol. Then the sheiks of course wear a different kind of cloths because they are the nobility class in middle eastern culture. (not sure if I spelled sheiks right, I mean the religious leaders/preachers, not the other religion)
Anyways, I am not ignorant to the reasons why these things are worn, and I am aware of their cultural significance. Additionally, I am aware that many (perhaps most) of the women wear that by choice because the secular concept of women showing off their body is a new concept and many in the middle east are still not comfortable with it. Think of 1910 America, where women had their role and were expected to dress "appropriately" and stay in their place. It's essentially the same thing. Really the middle east isn't far behind because we were doing that in America as late as the 50's and 60's, and even still today in some areas.
I support upholding cultural tradition. they should have the option to wear it. I am opposed to husbands forcing it on their wives etc, but again it's really not my place to intervene in the cultural/moral boundaries which have existed for thousands of years.
Isn't it Ironic that places like Iraq where literally the birthplace of civilization, the crowning achievements of man, and yet now it has been reduced to little more that a desert with hookah smoking nomads, terrorists, and young GI's occupying it? America will do well to keep that in mind. There have been many larger empires and greater forces that have fallen into those sands before us. To think we are invincible is naive and reckless.
But still, as Lx said, I endorse anything that pokes muslims with a stick.
Comment