Article by Oralcancerfoundation.org

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Inigo Montoya
    New Member
    • Mar 2011
    • 8

    #1

    Article by Oralcancerfoundation.org

    Still researching snus and found and article on oralcancerfoundation.org with a long report on smoking and dip with this snippet at the end about snus.

    New research from The Department of Environmental Medicine at the Swedish medical university Karolinska Institutet demonstrates that users of Swedish smokeless tobacco called 'snus' run a higher risk of dying from cardiac arrest and stroke. Although the study did not show an increased risk of snus use and [incidence of] myocardial infarction, it did show a 30 per cent increased risk of fatal heart attack compared with people who have never used the product. Amongst those who suffer non-fatal heart attacks, users of snus have a higher fatality rate in general than non-users, and from cardiovascular diseases in particular.

    Users also ran a higher risk of developing high blood pressure, which is a known factor of cardiovascular disease and they were also more likely to suffer a fatal stroke. Two major population studies were used for the research. The first comprised Swedish men between the ages of 45 and 70, living in the counties of Stockholm or Västernorrland between 1992 and 1994. A total of 1,432 men diagnosed with first-episode myocardial infarction were compared in terms of tobacco habits and other factors with a control group of men from the same regions without heart problems. The second was a study using data from health checks of all workers in the building industry between the years of 1978 and 1993. Information recorded at these checks included tobacco habits and blood pressure. Episodes of non-fatal and fatal myocardial infarction, strokes and blood pressure readings for over 100,000 snus users and non-users were followed until 2003/4.

    Complete link here ... http://www.oralcancerfoundation.org/...of_tobacco.htm

    Not a lot in there you guys don't already know but a lot of the article focused on cancer until they got to swedish snus, then it focused on heart attack and high blood pressure.

    Sorry if this has been posted before, seemed an interesting article to me.

    You may resume you regularly scheduled snusing now
  • CoderGuy
    Member
    • Jul 2009
    • 2679

    #2
    Originally posted by Inigo Montoya View Post
    Still researching snus and found and article on oralcancerfoundation.org with a long report on smoking and dip with this snippet at the end about snus.

    New research from The Department of Environmental Medicine at the Swedish medical university Karolinska Institutet demonstrates that users of Swedish smokeless tobacco called 'snus' run a higher risk of dying from cardiac arrest and stroke. Although the study did not show an increased risk of snus use and [incidence of] myocardial infarction, it did show a 30 per cent increased risk of fatal heart attack compared with people who have never used the product. Amongst those who suffer non-fatal heart attacks, users of snus have a higher fatality rate in general than non-users, and from cardiovascular diseases in particular.

    Users also ran a higher risk of developing high blood pressure, which is a known factor of cardiovascular disease and they were also more likely to suffer a fatal stroke. Two major population studies were used for the research. The first comprised Swedish men between the ages of 45 and 70, living in the counties of Stockholm or Västernorrland between 1992 and 1994. A total of 1,432 men diagnosed with first-episode myocardial infarction were compared in terms of tobacco habits and other factors with a control group of men from the same regions without heart problems. The second was a study using data from health checks of all workers in the building industry between the years of 1978 and 1993. Information recorded at these checks included tobacco habits and blood pressure. Episodes of non-fatal and fatal myocardial infarction, strokes and blood pressure readings for over 100,000 snus users and non-users were followed until 2003/4.

    Complete link here ... http://www.oralcancerfoundation.org/...of_tobacco.htm

    Not a lot in there you guys don't already know but a lot of the article focused on cancer until they got to swedish snus, then it focused on heart attack and high blood pressure.

    Sorry if this has been posted before, seemed an interesting article to me.

    You may resume you regularly scheduled snusing now
    It is interesting, thanks. Just proves what the Swedes have already said, snusing doesn't cause cancer.

    The problem with these types of studies is they always compare to people that have never smoked or people that have never used oral tobacco. They need to do a study where they take 1000 2pk per day smokers and switch them to snus and see how much they have reduced harm.

    Comment

    • snusgetter
      Member
      • May 2010
      • 10903

      #3
      Originally posted by CoderGuy View Post
      It is interesting, thanks. Just proves what the Swedes have already said, snusing doesn't cause cancer.

      The problem with these types of studies is they always compare to people that have never smoked or people that have never used oral tobacco. They need to do a study where they take 1000 2pk per day smokers and switch them to snus and see how much they have reduced harm.

      But then they'd lose their arguments!!
      Can't have that, now, can we??

      Comment

      • visiON
        Member
        • Mar 2010
        • 308

        #4
        I hate how they bring out the 100k people statistics, because it's only statistics.
        If 10 people, that have never used tobacco products, out of a 100,000 got cancer,heart attack whatever, and they compared it to 20 that got cancer,heart attack or whatever. The 20 might have gotten cancer / had a heart attack even if they didn't use tobacco.

        Comment

        • CoderGuy
          Member
          • Jul 2009
          • 2679

          #5
          Originally posted by visiON View Post
          I hate how they bring out the 100k people statistics, because it's only statistics.
          If 10 people, that have never used tobacco products, out of a 100,000 got cancer,heart attack whatever, and they compared it to 20 that got cancer,heart attack or whatever. The 20 might have gotten cancer / had a heart attack even if they didn't use tobacco.
          Exactly. For instance when they talk about snus doubling your risk of pancreatic cancer. Well true, but 4 out of 100000 never users get pancreatic cancer, compared to 8 out of 100000 snusers. But what they dont tell you is 16 out of 100000 smokers get it. So again, smoker switching to snus, you cut your risk in 1/2

          Comment

          • stubby2
            Member
            • Jun 2009
            • 436

            #6
            Brad Rodu has done a number of recent articles on his blog about the Karolinska Institutet and one on pancreatic cancer

            http://rodutobaccotruth.blogspot.com...co-is-not.html

            http://rodutobaccotruth.blogspot.com...e-want-to.html

            http://rodutobaccotruth.blogspot.com...arolinska.html

            http://rodutobaccotruth.blogspot.com...us-use-in.html

            The Karolinska Institutet appears to be yet another anti-tobacco groups of zealots with highly questionable studies. It certainly appears that the more recent studies have shown no connection with smokeless tobacco and pancreatic cancer. This was a matter of...... cooking the books. You have to be very careful as to what you read when it comes to tobacco as it's such a politically charged subject. Just go over to places like Tobacco Free Kids, ALA, ACS, AHA, and see what they have to say about smokeless tobacco

            http://investinginyouth.org/wp-conte...et-6-16-08.pdf

            If you are really interested in doing research give this a read. Much better information then the propaganda type link you provided.

            http://www.tobaccoharmreduction.org/thr2010yearbook.htm

            Comment

            • Inigo Montoya
              New Member
              • Mar 2011
              • 8

              #7
              Stubby,

              Thanks for the links bro, lots of good reading there.

              Comment

              • Frosted
                Member
                • Mar 2010
                • 5798

                #8
                Take snus and just look after yourself.
                If you sit in a chair your whole life, of course your cardiovascular system is going to be weak.

                I'm the guinea pig here, the user and snus has NOT increased my blood pressure, not even slightly - 120/69.
                Those folks with the high blood pressure etc. were either going to get it anyway through genetics or just sat on their backsides eating McDonalds all their life - those are the causes of cardiovascular disease, along with smoking of course.

                Comment

                • precious007
                  Banned Users
                  • Sep 2010
                  • 5885

                  #9
                  117 - 79 .... never had blood pressure issues .....

                  I do have a bad circulation though, due to the sedentary life,...

                  Thanks for the article.

                  Comment

                  • Frosted
                    Member
                    • Mar 2010
                    • 5798

                    #10
                    Bang on there danielan.

                    Comment

                    • Snusdog
                      Member
                      • Jun 2008
                      • 6752

                      #11
                      Originally posted by Inigo Montoya View Post
                      Amongst those who suffer non-fatal heart attacks, users of snus have a higher fatality rate in general than non-users, and from cardiovascular diseases in particular.
                      Is it me...................or does something seem not quite right about this claim.

                      I mean..........how can there be a fatality rate........................ for non-fatal occurrences.

                      Or

                      are they saying that in general ....................snusers tend to die .....................while nonsusers..............live forever...........and eventually become Highlanders............... and sword fight each other for world mastery.

                      Gotta love science...............
                      When it's my time to go, I want to die peacefully in my sleep, like my uncle did....... Not screaming in terror like his passengers

                      Comment

                      • Snusdog
                        Member
                        • Jun 2008
                        • 6752

                        #12
                        Originally posted by Inigo Montoya View Post
                        Two major population studies were used for the research. The first comprised Swedish men between the ages of 45 and 70, living in the counties of Stockholm or Västernorrland between 1992 and 1994. A total of 1,432 men diagnosed with first-episode myocardial infarction were compared in terms of tobacco habits and other factors with a control group of men from the same regions without heart problems.

                        The second was a study using data from health checks of all workers in the building industry between the years of 1978 and 1993. Information recorded at these checks included tobacco habits and blood pressure. Episodes of non-fatal and fatal myocardial infarction, strokes and blood pressure readings for over 100,000 snus users and non-users were followed until 2003/4.
                        I know that the second study was dismissed by US government researchers as compromised and inconclusive. I seem to remember the first one suffering the same fate.

                        The simple fact is that if these studies were even remotely relighable..............the warning labels on snus IN SWEDEN would read very differently than they do now. The Swedish government was not forced to remove their prior warnings because they had strong evidence in their corner.
                        When it's my time to go, I want to die peacefully in my sleep, like my uncle did....... Not screaming in terror like his passengers

                        Comment

                        • CoderGuy
                          Member
                          • Jul 2009
                          • 2679

                          #13
                          Originally posted by Snusdog View Post
                          Is it me...................or does something seem not quite right about this claim.

                          I mean..........how can there be a fatality rate........................ for non-fatal occurrences.

                          Or

                          are they saying that in general ....................snusers tend to die .....................while nonsusers..............live forever...........and eventually become Highlanders............... and sword fight each other for world mastery.

                          Gotta love science...............

                          LMAO!

                          Who wants to live forever. Would rather have a shortened life filled with snus than a life 5 years longer craving nic for the duration.

                          Comment

                          • GoVegan
                            Member
                            • Oct 2009
                            • 5603

                            #14
                            Originally posted by CoderGuy View Post
                            It is interesting, thanks. Just proves what the Swedes have already said, snusing doesn't cause cancer.

                            The problem with these types of studies is they always compare to people that have never smoked or people that have never used oral tobacco. They need to do a study where they take 1000 2pk per day smokers and switch them to snus and see how much they have reduced harm.
                            I would love to see that study. I would also like to see a study about the effectiveness of using snus to stop smoking vs other NRT's like the patch or gum.

                            Comment

                            • CoderGuy
                              Member
                              • Jul 2009
                              • 2679

                              #15
                              Originally posted by GoVegan View Post
                              I would love to see that study. I would also like to see a study about the effectiveness of using snus to stop smoking vs other NRT's like the patch or gum.
                              That too would be a good study. I know I had tried patches, Zyban, gum, more patches, even the e-cig, and nothing could stop me from smoking, until I started snus. Now next month will be 2 years without even a drag on a cig after 26 years @ 2 pk per day.

                              Comment

                              Related Topics

                              Collapse

                              Working...
                              X