Translated using Bing:
from: http://www.kristeligt-dagblad.dk/art...passiv-rygning
Why is it only retired academics who dares to tell the truth about passive smoking?
Why after the fairytales told all that passive smoking is at its own peril? Even some smokers believe passive smoking is dangerous. Well, friends, it is grotesque. Get it now from the header ...
There are only two people who have read all the material on passive smoking, which exist in the world. One is happen to me! and I say that there is no evidence of risk from passive smoking. The proof consists of false investigations which is built on top of each other.
You may not believe me? -Well, so check the other. It is the French professor and pulmonary physician Philippe Even.
The day, Philippe Fairy retired from his job as head of the largest medical faculty in France, he gave an interview in the newspaper Le Normandie, where he said: "now I can finally tell the truth: the smoking law is based on a lie-passive smoking is safe!"
Read the interview here: http://dengulenegl.dk/blog/?p=2581 need to be more clearly? Or do you want to read all the material itself? It took me a year's time. You can also see what other critical researchers says: http://tctactics.org/index.php/Critical_Scientists leave it glowing clear: second-hand smoke build and irritating to some-but passive smoking as we know it, is not dangerous for anyone, if they are otherwise normal, healthy people.
This brings us back to the real: to take account of the other. But if we do not build those present, there is of course no reason to go outside and smoke ...!
And remember: anyone who owns the property, you are on, should determine whether smoking is allowed here or not. Not the State. Not health care and not some eccentrics in Anti-cancer. But the restaurateur, who owns the restaurant. Or the person who owns the House or apartment.
And then we have to find out why all academics in the health service have jumped on it. Are they stupid? No. They are simply afraid of being bullied by their colleagues. Just as children are only to be harassed by teammates. This is the truth.
Why after the fairytales told all that passive smoking is at its own peril? Even some smokers believe passive smoking is dangerous. Well, friends, it is grotesque. Get it now from the header ...
There are only two people who have read all the material on passive smoking, which exist in the world. One is happen to me! and I say that there is no evidence of risk from passive smoking. The proof consists of false investigations which is built on top of each other.
You may not believe me? -Well, so check the other. It is the French professor and pulmonary physician Philippe Even.
The day, Philippe Fairy retired from his job as head of the largest medical faculty in France, he gave an interview in the newspaper Le Normandie, where he said: "now I can finally tell the truth: the smoking law is based on a lie-passive smoking is safe!"
Read the interview here: http://dengulenegl.dk/blog/?p=2581 need to be more clearly? Or do you want to read all the material itself? It took me a year's time. You can also see what other critical researchers says: http://tctactics.org/index.php/Critical_Scientists leave it glowing clear: second-hand smoke build and irritating to some-but passive smoking as we know it, is not dangerous for anyone, if they are otherwise normal, healthy people.
This brings us back to the real: to take account of the other. But if we do not build those present, there is of course no reason to go outside and smoke ...!
And remember: anyone who owns the property, you are on, should determine whether smoking is allowed here or not. Not the State. Not health care and not some eccentrics in Anti-cancer. But the restaurateur, who owns the restaurant. Or the person who owns the House or apartment.
And then we have to find out why all academics in the health service have jumped on it. Are they stupid? No. They are simply afraid of being bullied by their colleagues. Just as children are only to be harassed by teammates. This is the truth.
