Nicotine and Breast Cancer

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • snusgetter
    Member
    • May 2010
    • 10903

    #1

    Nicotine and Breast Cancer

    ~
    Nicotine in cigarettes linked to breast cancer for the first time


    By Claire Bates
    24th August 2010


    The substance that makes cigarettes addictive may also cause the growth of cancer tumours, scientists revealed today.

    It is the first time nicotine has been implicated as one of the chemicals in cigarettes that can trigger the development of breast cancer.

    The findings, published in The Journal of the National Cancer Institute, could be a major blow to makers of nicotine-based products that help smokers to quit.


    A customer uses an electronic cigarette that contains just nicotine and water. It has been
    promoted as a 'healthy alternative' but now scientists have linked nicotine to breast cancer

    Normal cigarettes are known to contain at least 60 cancer-causing substances including carbon monoxide, tar and arsenic, but until now nicotine had not been on the list.

    Researchers from Taipei Medical University looked looked at both breast cancer cells and normal cells to see if nicotine promoted tumour growth at a cellular level.

    Dr Yuan-Soon Ho and his team found that when normal cells were treated with nicotine in the laboratory it promoted the development of cancer characteristics. Likewise reducing the level of nicotine inhibited tumour growth.

    The research could have a negative impact on companies that make nicotine gum, patches and electronic cigarettes that are promoted as a 'healthy alternative' for smokers.

    The authors said their study was limited by its small sample size, which looked at just a few hundred Asian patients and further study was needed.

    In an accompanying editorial Dr Ilona Linnoila of the Center for Cancer Research at the National Cancer Institute, said: 'The study suggests not only that smoking could be causally related to breast carcinogenesis but also that nicotine could directly contribute to the molecular mechanism of carcinogenesis in addition to indirectly contributing by promoting addiction to smoking.'

    She added: 'Better understanding of the molecular mechanisms of the cholinergic pathways will lead to more opportunities for intervention and prevention of tobacco toxicity.'
  • c.nash
    Banned Users
    • May 2010
    • 3511

    #2
    Wow... Who would have thunk it.


    We'll see if it's disproved or if people will go with it.

    You think this is a ploy to knock off all the alternatives?

    Comment

    • snusgetter
      Member
      • May 2010
      • 10903

      #3
      Originally posted by c.nash View Post
      Wow... Who would have thunk it.


      We'll see if it's disproved or if people will go with it.


      You think this is a ploy to knock off all the alternatives?

      Betcha that news stories soon will be mentioning snus by name!!

      Comment

      • c.nash
        Banned Users
        • May 2010
        • 3511

        #4
        Originally posted by snusgetter View Post
        Betcha that news stories soon will be mentioning snus by name!!
        Well. Maybe like they say "Any press is good press".

        Comment

        • snusgetter
          Member
          • May 2010
          • 10903

          #5
          Originally posted by c.nash View Post
          Well. Maybe like they say "Any press is good press".

          As PT Barnum (or was it WC Fields) said:

          "There's no such thing as bad publicity; just publicity handled badly."

          Then again, Mae West was known to utter a few choice words.

          Comment

          • Snussles
            Member
            • Jul 2010
            • 108

            #6
            :O

            Dammit! But breast are awesome!

            All this proves is that women should leave the nicotine to the guys, we have "less to lose", or the very least nothing as nice...

            Comment

            • PipenSnus
              Member
              • Apr 2010
              • 1038

              #7
              This is the most important sentence in the whole article: "The authors said their study was limited by its small sample size, which looked at just a few hundred Asian patients and further study was needed."

              If the sample size was too small to produce statistically significant results, then everything else in the article is meaningless propaganda.

              Comment

              • snusgetter
                Member
                • May 2010
                • 10903

                #8
                Originally posted by PipenSnus
                This is the most important sentence in the whole article: "The authors said their study was limited by its small sample size, which looked at just a few hundred Asian patients and further study was needed."

                If the sample size was too small to produce statistically significant results, then everything else in the article is meaningless propaganda.

                Propaganda that generates headlines, with ensuing articles
                claiming to convey critical information.

                Because the findings were published in The Journal of the National
                Cancer Institute
                , credibility is given to the misinformation.

                Remember, people who tend to lean towards soundbites do not
                consider anything that reinforces their views as meaningless.

                That's news reporting 101-2000.

                Comment

                • truthwolf1
                  Member
                  • Oct 2008
                  • 2696

                  #9
                  X-rays, Computer moniters, Wireless networks, Birth Control Pills, Not breast feeding, Abortions, food manipulation and then possibly the evil nicotine.

                  Comment

                  • Darwin
                    Member
                    • Mar 2010
                    • 1372

                    #10
                    "Further study" is always needed, gotta keep the research bucks flowing. And just what equivalent dosage related to human consumption did this study use on their cell cultures? Details people details. There are damn all few substances that are not carcinogenic or harmful in sufficient dosages.

                    Comment

                    • snusgetter
                      Member
                      • May 2010
                      • 10903

                      #11
                      Originally posted by Darwin
                      "Further study" is always needed, gotta keep the research bucks flowing. ...

                      A good reason for the researchers to keep pumping out the incessant propaganda...
                      Lets their backers know they've been hard at work but more funding is needed!!

                      For them, this is the perfect PR opportunity.

                      Comment

                      • desirexe
                        Member
                        • Feb 2008
                        • 1170

                        #12
                        Very interesting is all I can say. Every single woman that I have heard of getting breast cancer are NOT smokers. Unless they are closet snuufers... (was there an outcome from the "Name Game" thread to tie the words snus & snuff together?)...they did not use nicotine in any form. When research like this comes up, it serves as a reminder that many things out there CAN cause cancer; breathing the air, eating smoked foods, the sun, drinking from plastic bottles, etc..I won't be surprised someday if we learn that instant hand sanitizer CAN cause cancer.

                        PS - Just in case there is any truth to this study, I'll be sure to pay extra special attention to my ta-tas so thank you fellow snuson members for the info.

                        Comment

                        • ChaoticGemini
                          Member
                          • Jun 2010
                          • 564

                          #13
                          lmao just thinking of the pictogram used to represent this warning on the cans

                          Comment

                          • Jwalker
                            Member
                            • May 2010
                            • 1067

                            #14
                            Smokles the blog covered this, the study was done on just cells exposed to ridiculous amounts of nicotine. Oh and by the way lung cancer is the number one lethal killer of women(for cancer not heart disease other causes) now, it passed breast cancer a while ago.

                            Comment

                            Related Topics

                            Collapse

                            Working...
                            X