WHAT THE SNUS! Smoking cessation treatments save lives...

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • snusgetter
    Member
    • May 2010
    • 10903

    WHAT THE SNUS! Smoking cessation treatments save lives...

    ~
    Smoking cessation treatments cost-effective: U.S. study


    By Julie Steenhuysen
    CHICAGO | Tue Sep 14, 2010

    CHICAGO (Reuters) - Investing in smoking cessation treatments saves lives and it may be sound fiscal policy, U.S. researchers said on Tuesday.

    They said for every $1 spent on smoking cessation treatments, states will get back $1.26, amounting to a 26 percent return on their investment.

    The study, done by researchers at Penn State University, compared the costs of drug treatments and counseling programs aimed at helping people quit smoking with the cost of premature deaths, lost productivity and the health costs of smoking, which increases the risk of cancers and heart disease.

    It was funded by a grant from Pfizer Inc, maker of the smoking cessation drug Chantix, known generically as varenicline.

    "Smoking results in costs to the United States of more than $300 billion a year," Paul Billings of the American Lung Association told reporters in a news briefing.

    That includes $67.5 billion in lost workplace productivity; $117 billion from the cost of people dying prematurely; and $116 billion in direct medical expenditures.

    "Sadly, smoking continues to kill 393,000 people in the United States each year," Billings told the briefing.

    Although the average cost of a pack of cigarettes nationwide is $5.61, the real cost in terms of lost lives and productivity is $18.05 per pack.

    "The cost to society is more than three times the average retail price of a pack of cigarettes," he said.

    The study hits as state and federal officials implement smoking cessation provisions that were part of healthcare reform legislation.

    The American Lung Association is urging states to expand coverage of smoking cessation for residents enrolled in Medicaid, the joint federal and state health program for low-income people.

    Only six states provide comprehensive coverage for Medicaid recipients: Indiana, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Nevada, Oregon and Pennsylvania.

    "This study adds a powerful economic argument that helping smokers quit saves money," Jennifer Singleterry of the American Lung Association said in a statement.

    Smoking is the No. 1 preventable cause of illness and death in the United States. Cigarette smoke causes 90 percent of all cases of lung cancer, which kills 1.2 million people a year globally.




    "funded by a grant from Pfizer Inc, maker of the smoking cessation drug Chantix" ...

    What are the chances of snus (Swedish or otherwise) being
    mentioned as a smoking cessation aid!!

    Let's see........... Once again, when will hell freeze over?
  • PipenSnus
    Member
    • Apr 2010
    • 1038

    #2
    Most American doctors and health organizations refuse to take harm reduction seriously, despite the evidence. Overseas it's another matter entirely.

    Hmmm... who could be to blame... well, just look at all the conflict of interest scandals involving the pharmaceutical industry.

    Comment

    • c.nash
      Banned Users
      • May 2010
      • 3511

      #3
      Lols. This will never go hugely public. Big tobacco and big pharmaceutical hate things like this. Lol

      Comment

      • Simplysnus
        Member
        • May 2010
        • 481

        #4
        I take offense to the notion that the costs include my future worker bee status.

        Comment

        • jagmanss
          Member
          • Jul 2010
          • 12213

          #5
          Originally posted by c.nash View Post
          Lols. This will never go hugely public. Big tobacco and big pharmaceutical hate things like this. Lol
          +1

          I agree and so very true

          Comment

          • texastorm
            Member
            • Jul 2010
            • 386

            #6
            How can you do a study on something thats not a constant. People are going to die anyway.

            While I agree smoking is a killer, this study was funded by a big pharmaceutical company, and the number I am not seeing in there assessment is the tax revenue from sales tax on smokes, usually more than the cost of the product itself. When everyone quits smoking what new tax replaces the income from the tobacco cash cow? I think big tobacco could fund a study and find the opposite result if they wanted to.

            Comment

            • snusgetter
              Member
              • May 2010
              • 10903

              #7
              Originally posted by texastorm View Post
              How can you do a study on something thats not a constant. People are going to die anyway.

              While I agree smoking is a killer, this study was funded by a big pharmaceutical company, and the number I am not seeing in there assessment is the tax revenue from sales tax on smokes, usually more than the cost of the product itself. When everyone quits smoking what new tax replaces the income from the tobacco cash cow? I think big tobacco could fund a study and find the opposite result if they wanted to.

              Where is Swedish Match ... aren't they like the largest snus producers in the world?

              I know they've published scientific papers but they seem so low-keyed that they're
              practically invisible. C'mon, SW, step up to the plate a little more forcefully and push
              the message of Harm Reduction to the forefront!!

              Comment

              • Jwalker
                Member
                • May 2010
                • 1067

                #8
                I like how lost productivity is a cost to society and not individuals. Have you ever seen studies about the productivity cost of obesity and Tv. What about the social security and medicare costs of living longer.

                Comment

                • GoVegan
                  Member
                  • Oct 2009
                  • 5603

                  #9
                  Originally posted by snusgetter View Post
                  Where is Swedish Match ... aren't they like the largest snus producers in the world?

                  I know they've published scientific papers but they seem so low-keyed that they're
                  practically invisible. C'mon, SW, step up to the plate a little more forcefully and push
                  the message of Harm Reduction to the forefront!!

                  That's a terrible idea - just imagine if snus actually gave cigarettes a run for their money. The tobacco companies would feel threatened and force Congress to write some crappy legislation that will make the PACT Act seem rather tame in comparison.

                  For the kids of course!

                  Comment

                  • visiON
                    Member
                    • Mar 2010
                    • 308

                    #10
                    Originally posted by GoVegan
                    That's a terrible idea - just imagine if snus actually gave cigarettes a run for their money. The tobacco companies would feel threatened and force Congress to write some crappy legislation that will make the PACT Act seem rather tame in comparison.

                    For the kids of course!
                    Hell yeah, kids ought to smoke, not snus!
                    Cause snusing is waaaaaaay more dangerous than smoking... Haven't you heard? Snus causes cancer! It's like comparing smoking cigarettes to cocaine....

                    Comment

                    • snusgetter
                      Member
                      • May 2010
                      • 10903

                      #11
                      Originally posted by GoVegan
                      That's a terrible idea - just imagine if snus actually gave cigarettes a run for their money. The tobacco companies would feel threatened and force Congress to write some crappy legislation that will make the PACT Act seem rather tame in comparison.

                      For the kids of course!

                      BAN THE CHILDREN



                      Make them illegal until adulthood .... for our own good!!

                      << the maximum allowed in these forums

                      Comment

                      Related Topics

                      Collapse

                      Working...
                      X