What long portion do you want ?

[jagmanss]

Yup, I agree. Thunder Coffee/Vanilla long and strong!!!

Yep we definitely don't need anymore mint anything. The more i think about it the more like the Thunder coffee/vanilla long idea

Man! How much longer do you guys want coffee/vanilla to be... I have an Offroad coffee/vanilla in now and is already long enough and coffee/vanilla should stay as Offroad and not be Thunder at least if it does become a thunder please leave out any hint of any mint....

[snusgetter]

Man! How much longer do you guys want coffee/vanilla to be... I have an Offroad coffee/vanilla in now and is already long enough and coffee/vanilla should stay as Offroad and not be Thunder at least if it does become a thunder please leave out any hint of any mint....

Long and SLIM!!

THUNDER conveys POWER a lot more than OFFROAD ----> =




Yeah, leave out the mint unless you can come up with a Mint SnusGum!!

[Guest]

I'd like a C/V long sterk portion.

PP gave me a taste for C/V

[Premium Parrots]

I guess we got Patriks attention. More C/V in the future. thank you Dear.


Patrik.....please don't screw with a good thing. I got a bunch of newer members [and some older ones too] liking the regular C/V just the way it is now. Starks and longs aren't for everybody. Not that I wouldn't try them. But I think it might limit the volume of C/V customers. Might I suggest that you bring the regulare C/V back as a regular production product and then when sales are sufficient introduce starks or longs as a limited edition and see how sales go. Not that I would even want the C/V in a stark. As far as the longs go.....I just don't see why the heck they even need to be produced in any flavor/brand. Maybe someone can tell me why.....other than for marketing.

just my opinion tho. Untill I try them its hard to say.

No snus manufacturer listens to its customers like V2 does. thanks for that mate.

[BadAxe]

II just don't see why the heck they even need to be produced in any flavor/brand. Maybe someone can tell me why.....other than for marketing.
just my opinion tho. Untill I try them its hard to say.

So for never having tried them, how could you even develop an opinion that they are not even needed.

In answer to your question as to why they need to be in existance, its so I don't go back to smoking. They are the PERFECT size, they have the PERFECT nic content (for me) and I snus nothing else except the long+. I think the long+ portions are the best thing to ever hit the snus market. It made SNUS 200% better of an experience for me. I literally snus nothing else. Well, I try other thngs, but do not like them due to the regular sized portions, and/or the nic content.

Yes, we need MORE long+ not less. And I would LOVE a 12mg long+ Thunder C/V.

And yes, we need wintergreen in long+ as well, no matter what the mint haters say. They don't have to buy it. (That was said in jest, so no flaming me).

[Monkey]

Coffee vanilla is awesome the way it was. I see no need to change it.

Phantom brown long....yes! Just wanted to say it again.

[snusgetter]

Coffee vanilla is awesome the way it was. I see no need to change it.
...

B-B-B-But...

A LONG+ Coffee/Vanilla would be an improvement of THUNDERing Proportions!!

[jagmanss]

I guess we got Patriks attention. More C/V in the future. thank you Dear.


Patrik.....please don't screw with a good thing. I got a bunch of newer members [and some older ones too] liking the regular C/V just the way it is now. Starks and longs aren't for everybody. Not that I wouldn't try them. But I think it might limit the volume of C/V customers. Might I suggest that you bring the regulare C/V back as a regular production product and then when sales are sufficient introduce starks or longs as a limited edition and see how sales go. Not that I would even want the C/V in a stark. As far as the longs go.....I just don't see why the heck they even need to be produced in any flavor/brand. Maybe someone can tell me why.....other than for marketing.

just my opinion tho. Untill I try them its hard to say.

No snus manufacturer listens to its customers like V2 does. thanks for that mate.

+1 I agree 100% with the above Quote..... What he said....

[Experimental Monkey]

You guys are in the minority. Longs are a growing segment in the snus market. I'd like to see every Thunder offering in long format. Why? More comfortable. Better nic content. 12mg is the perfect nic level while the 16 of regular Thunder is just way too much for me.

And one thing you need to think about - if you like Offroad C/V you would LOVE Thunder C/V considering the Thunder line's higher quality.

[jagmanss]

You guys are in the minority. Longs are a growing segment in the snus market. I'd like to see every Thunder offering in long format. Why? More comfortable. Better nic content. 12mg is the perfect nic level while the 16 of regular Thunder is just way too much for me.

And one thing you need to think about - if you like Offroad C&V you would LOVE Thunder C/V considering the Thunder line's higher quality.

- 10.... Don't agree...

[Experimental Monkey]

- 10.... Don't agree...

You don't agree that Thunder is a much higher quality product than Offroad? The price difference speaks for itself.

[jagmanss]

You don't agree that Thunder is a much higher quality product than Offroad? The price difference speaks for itself.

No.... I don't agree I would LOVE Thunder C/V.... Why mess with and change what is already a very good snus as Offroad C/V or that Thunder offering in long format is More comfortable. I would not like to see every Thunder in long format. 16mg of regular Thunder is not way too much for me. And I don't think I'm in the minority.... So... No Don't agree.

[lxskllr]

You don't agree that Thunder is a much higher quality product than Offroad? The price difference speaks for itself.

I haven't had Thunder, but ime, all of V2s snus is of similar quality. I think it's all the same snus, but priced for different demographics. Phantom is the discount line, but it's just as good as Offroad. My impression of Thunder, is it's just a high octane Offroad. I don't think there's substantial differences in quality.

[Connavar]

i have to agree... i like the thunder lines 16mg hit, and i like the offroad c/v the way it is, not saying i wouldn't mind seeing a thunder c/v but if you are going to offer it both should be offered

[jagmanss]

i have to agree... i like the thunder lines 16mg hit, and i like the offroad c/v the way it is, not saying i wouldn't mind seeing a thunder c/v but if you are going to offer it both should be offered

+1 There ya go... Now were talking..