I love this article.
"Smokeless tobacco, in particular the pouched Swedish “snus,” is by no means completely harmless, but studies have shown that those who use it regularly are at no greater risk for cancers — including oral cancers — than non-smokers. The pouches also have the benefit of delivering roughly as much nicotine as a cigarette, which makes them easier to transition to than low-dose gum or patches. Without any increase in tax, governments could reduce the burden smokers put on health care simply by encouraging the switch. As an added plus, snus doesn’t encourage those who pick it up to graduate to full-on smoking: Sweden, where it is most widely used, has the best smoking-reduction record in Europe."
The bolded part...meh....but that paragraph stuck out of the whole article to me.
http://fullcomment.nationalpost.com/...get-practical/
"Smokeless tobacco, in particular the pouched Swedish “snus,” is by no means completely harmless, but studies have shown that those who use it regularly are at no greater risk for cancers — including oral cancers — than non-smokers. The pouches also have the benefit of delivering roughly as much nicotine as a cigarette, which makes them easier to transition to than low-dose gum or patches. Without any increase in tax, governments could reduce the burden smokers put on health care simply by encouraging the switch. As an added plus, snus doesn’t encourage those who pick it up to graduate to full-on smoking: Sweden, where it is most widely used, has the best smoking-reduction record in Europe."
The bolded part...meh....but that paragraph stuck out of the whole article to me.
http://fullcomment.nationalpost.com/...get-practical/
Comment