If you start looking at the politics of tobacco it gets pretty ugly. There are millions of dollars/euros flowing into tobacco control, mostly from pharmaceutical companies. In the states it also comes from the master settlement which is money from tobacco companies. The more people smoke the more tobacco control makes from the master settlement. Lots of folks in tobacco control are making a very nice living off the backs of smokers. These include the likes of The American Cancer Society, American Heart Association, American Lung Association, Tobacco Free Kids, and on and on.
Here are a few blogs that show the huge amount of corruption gong on
http://tobaccoanalysis.blogspot.com
http://antithrlies.wordpress.com
http://wivapers.blogspot.com
http://velvetgloveironfist.blogspot.com
Tobacco control and our own governments have no interest in public health. There only interest is keeping the money flowing. TC is really nothing more then PR front groups for drug companies.
If the idea of tobacco harm reduction becomes mainstream these people would be out of work and lots of money would stop flowing. How are you going to tax the recreational use of nicotine in the form of smokeless tobacco when it is known to the public that it is 99% less harmful then smoking. All the rational for the current tax structure falls apart. That would be like trying to tax caffein at the same level we now tax cigarettes. There are lots of interested parties that will do and say anything to keep THR from becoming mainstream. That includes the EU ban, extreme taxation, lies and misinformation about the dangers of smokeless tobacco, denormalization of tobacco users, etc.
Here are a few blogs that show the huge amount of corruption gong on
http://tobaccoanalysis.blogspot.com
http://antithrlies.wordpress.com
http://wivapers.blogspot.com
http://velvetgloveironfist.blogspot.com
Tobacco control and our own governments have no interest in public health. There only interest is keeping the money flowing. TC is really nothing more then PR front groups for drug companies.
If the idea of tobacco harm reduction becomes mainstream these people would be out of work and lots of money would stop flowing. How are you going to tax the recreational use of nicotine in the form of smokeless tobacco when it is known to the public that it is 99% less harmful then smoking. All the rational for the current tax structure falls apart. That would be like trying to tax caffein at the same level we now tax cigarettes. There are lots of interested parties that will do and say anything to keep THR from becoming mainstream. That includes the EU ban, extreme taxation, lies and misinformation about the dangers of smokeless tobacco, denormalization of tobacco users, etc.
Comment