PACT Act [peaceful discussion, please.]

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • RRK
    Member
    • Sep 2009
    • 926

    #91
    I'm just getting the spinning clock thingy. It worked earlier but do you think there are really that many people watching? Blacked out? At lunch?

    Comment

    • sagedil
      Member
      • Nov 2007
      • 7077

      #92
      Re: S. 1147:

      Originally posted by BabaBooey
      The only time I would even start to worry is if it makes it to the Senate vote, then it still has to pass the House Vote. Personally, I think way too many people are way too paranoid.
      It already passed the house overwhelmingly, like only 19 no's

      Of course, the House passed it last year and the Senate never acted on it.

      Comment

      • RRK
        Member
        • Sep 2009
        • 926

        #93
        Re: S. 1147:

        Originally posted by BabaBooey
        ...the bill is sponsored by Herbert (Herb) Kohl, U.S. Senator, Wisconsin. Herbert Kohl has sponsored 215 bills since Jan 14, 1991 of which 190 haven't made it out of committee and 1 were successfully enacted.
        I think the bill has more sponsers then just Kohl. It lists Kohl D-Wisconsin, Leahy D-Vermont, Schumer D-New York, Specter D-Pennsylvania, Feinstein D-California, Klobuchar D-Minnesota.

        ...and Leahy is the committee chairman.

        Comment

        • Anthony
          Member
          • Jul 2009
          • 249

          #94
          Originally posted by RRK
          I'm just getting the spinning clock thingy. It worked earlier but do you think there are really that many people watching? Blacked out? At lunch?
          Lunch.

          Comment

          • RRK
            Member
            • Sep 2009
            • 926

            #95
            Originally posted by Anthony
            Lunch.
            Ah, Ok. Any idea when they are supposed to be back?

            Comment

            • PsychoHazard
              Member
              • Oct 2009
              • 267

              #96
              Originally posted by RRK
              Originally posted by Anthony
              Lunch.
              Ah, Ok. Any idea when they are supposed to be back?
              It will probably depend on how many martinis lunch entails.

              Comment

              • Anthony
                Member
                • Jul 2009
                • 249

                #97
                Originally posted by RRK
                Originally posted by Anthony
                Lunch.
                Ah, Ok. Any idea when they are supposed to be back?
                I don't know. Probably 2:00 Eastern... Wishing for never.

                there are still 2 items ahead of S1147...
                http://judiciary.senate.gov/hearings...ng.cfm?id=4157

                Also, that page has a link to the webcast that looks like it works now.

                Comment

                • RRK
                  Member
                  • Sep 2009
                  • 926

                  #98
                  Originally posted by PsychoHazard
                  It will probably depend on how many martinis lunch entails.
                  Oh come one. Everyone knows that lunch means a double Scotch and a cigar. :wink:

                  Comment

                  • RRK
                    Member
                    • Sep 2009
                    • 926

                    #99
                    Originally posted by Anthony

                    Also, that page has a link to the webcast that looks like it works now.
                    Oh, that must be a different feed then http://judiciary.senate.gov/webcast/livewebcast.cfm.

                    Comment

                    • RRK
                      Member
                      • Sep 2009
                      • 926

                      OH, they are back from lunch.

                      Comment

                      • Anthony
                        Member
                        • Jul 2009
                        • 249

                        Held over. Maybe another day.

                        Comment

                        • PsychoHazard
                          Member
                          • Oct 2009
                          • 267

                          Originally posted by Anthony
                          Held over. Maybe another day.
                          Well, it doesn't look like they have another business meeting scheduled for the rest of the year, so maybe that'll be the end of it.

                          Comment

                          • RRK
                            Member
                            • Sep 2009
                            • 926

                            Originally posted by PsychoHazard
                            Originally posted by Anthony
                            Held over. Maybe another day.
                            Well, it doesn't look like they have another business meeting scheduled for the rest of the year, so maybe that'll be the end of it.
                            I think they said another bill if held over would have to wait two weeks. Are you guys sure they held PACT over?

                            Comment

                            • PsychoHazard
                              Member
                              • Oct 2009
                              • 267

                              Originally posted by RRK
                              Originally posted by PsychoHazard
                              Originally posted by Anthony
                              Held over. Maybe another day.
                              Well, it doesn't look like they have another business meeting scheduled for the rest of the year, so maybe that'll be the end of it.
                              I think they said another bill if held over would have to wait two weeks. Are you guys sure they held PACT over?
                              It says so on their website:
                              Originally posted by http://judiciary.senate.gov/
                              Results of Executive Business Meeting - November 5, 2009
                              The Senate Judiciary Committee held an executive business meeting to consider pending nominations and legislation on November 5, 2009.

                              Agenda

                              I. Nominations

                              Jane Branstetter Stranch to be United States Circuit Judge for the Sixth Circuit
                              Held Over

                              Benjamin B. Tucker to be Deputy Director for State, Local and Tribal Affairs, Office of Drug Control Policy
                              Held Over

                              Ketanji Brown Jackson to be a Commissioner of the United States Sentencing Commission
                              Ordered Reported by Unanimous Consent

                              Kenyen Ray Brown to be United States Attorney for the Southern District of Alabama
                              Ordered Reported by Unanimous Consent

                              Stephanie M. Rose to be United States Attorney for the Northern District of Iowa
                              Ordered Reported by Unanimous Consent

                              Nicholas A. Klinefeldt to be United States Attorney for the Southern District of Iowa
                              Ordered Reported by Unanimous Consent


                              II. Bills

                              S. 448, Free Flow of Information Act of 2009 (Specter, Schumer, Graham, Klobuchar)
                              Held Over

                              H.R. 985, Free Flow of Information Act
                              Held Over

                              S. 714, National Criminal Justice Commission Act of 2009 (Webb, Graham, Leahy, Hatch, Schumer, Durbin, Cardin, Whitehouse, Franken, Specter)
                              Held Over

                              S. 1490, Personal Data Privacy and Security Act of 2009 (Leahy, Specter, Feingold, Schumer, Cardin)
                              Ordered Reported by Roll Call Vote, 14 - 5

                              Amendment GRA09882 (Leahy)
                              Adopted by Unanimous Consent

                              Amendment GRA09859 (Sessions)
                              Rejected by Roll Call Vote, 6 - 13

                              Amendment GRA09884 (Kyl)
                              Rejected by Roll Call Vote, 7 - 12

                              Amendment GRA09876 (Coburn)
                              Withdrawn

                              Amendment GRA09877 (Coburn)
                              Withdrawn

                              Amendment GRA09857 (Sessions)
                              Withdrawn

                              Amendment GRA09889 (Kyl)
                              Withdrawn

                              S. 139, Data Breach Notification Act (Feinstein)
                              Ordered Reported by Roll Call Vote, 14 - 2

                              S. 1624, Medical Bankruptcy Fairness Act of 2009 (Whitehouse, Franken, Feingold)
                              Held Over

                              S. 1472, Human Rights Enforcement Act of 2009 (Durbin, Coburn, Leahy, Cardin)
                              Ordered Reported by Voice Vote

                              Amendment MDM09890 (Durbin)
                              Adopted by Unanimous Consent

                              S. 1147, Prevent All Cigarette Trafficking Act of 2009 (Kohl, Leahy, Schumer, Specter, Feinstein, Klobuchar)
                              Held Over

                              Comment

                              • RRK
                                Member
                                • Sep 2009
                                • 926

                                Oh, cool. :P

                                Comment

                                Related Topics

                                Collapse

                                Working...
                                X