I'm relatively new to snus (ordered my first tins of General portion about a year ago) and just registered on this forum. Right now I'm going through the 30 tins of Ettan I got last month from Northerner. Incidentally, I emptied some of the portions out to try Ettan loose, and I discovered that I prefer loose to portion by FAR. I bought an oral syringe and cut off the end for use in baking the Ettan, and the flavor is different and much more intense, at least initially, with loose vs. portion.
I've read posts on this forum before, and there's a lot of talk of a "buzz" associated with snus. I don't get it. I am a smoker as well (I use snus primarily to cut down on cigarettes - and it works!) and I have never gotten a nicotine buzz from snus, to be honest. I remember when I first started smoking 17 years ago that I would get a buzz from cigarettes on occasion, but the reason is obvious: smoking, while delivering less nicotine than oral smokeless tobacco over a period of time, does cause a much higher peak of nicotine in the bloodstream. I rarely get a buzz from cigarettes now (even my first one in the morning) and certainly have never gotten a buzz from snus.
Is it possible that I am less sensitive to snus than others? Maybe because of my smoking? I also smoked a certain substance all the time back in college that is well known for its buzzes, and maybe I just know too well what a buzz feels like? For some reason I don't get a buzz, but rather use snus, as I said, to calm my cravings for smokes. It is entirely possible that others are more sensitive, though perhaps it's a placebo effect (if you expect a buzz, you get one).
But is it even in the best interest of snus users to be talking about a buzz that may or may not be placebo? In Puritan America, it seems that snus is more likely to be banned if it has a reputation for causing a buzz than if it's viewed by the public as just another nicotine/tobacco product like Skoal or Copenhagen. I realize that the product seems more attractive if it induces some valued altered state of mind in the user, but honestly I have never experienced this with snus (never even wanted to), and the American fundamentalist brigade and the "medocracy" would have a field-day in an effort to ban the stuff if snus was viewed by the public as some sort of incredibly-high-potency nicotine drug.
In any case, a nicotine buzz is not much of a selling point in any tobacco product. A nicotine buzz only lasts about a minute, and it is not why people even smoke cigarettes. Smoking (and snus) are about satiating a craving, not getting high. Most smokers (like me) will tell you that the wish they had never started, and we say this precisely BECAUSE there seems to be no point except to get a "fix" and satiate a strong urge to smoke. There is no "high" or altered state of significance as a selling point, like there is with, say, marijuana. This is why, it seems, marijuana smokers are much more content to be marijuana smokers than tobacco smokers are to be smokers.
By the way, I have on order, to be delivered tomorrow, the following: Goteborgs Prima Fint and Goteborgs Rape, Offroad Wintergreen, and Roda Lacket - all loose. Any ideas what to expect from these brands?
Cheers.
I've read posts on this forum before, and there's a lot of talk of a "buzz" associated with snus. I don't get it. I am a smoker as well (I use snus primarily to cut down on cigarettes - and it works!) and I have never gotten a nicotine buzz from snus, to be honest. I remember when I first started smoking 17 years ago that I would get a buzz from cigarettes on occasion, but the reason is obvious: smoking, while delivering less nicotine than oral smokeless tobacco over a period of time, does cause a much higher peak of nicotine in the bloodstream. I rarely get a buzz from cigarettes now (even my first one in the morning) and certainly have never gotten a buzz from snus.
Is it possible that I am less sensitive to snus than others? Maybe because of my smoking? I also smoked a certain substance all the time back in college that is well known for its buzzes, and maybe I just know too well what a buzz feels like? For some reason I don't get a buzz, but rather use snus, as I said, to calm my cravings for smokes. It is entirely possible that others are more sensitive, though perhaps it's a placebo effect (if you expect a buzz, you get one).
But is it even in the best interest of snus users to be talking about a buzz that may or may not be placebo? In Puritan America, it seems that snus is more likely to be banned if it has a reputation for causing a buzz than if it's viewed by the public as just another nicotine/tobacco product like Skoal or Copenhagen. I realize that the product seems more attractive if it induces some valued altered state of mind in the user, but honestly I have never experienced this with snus (never even wanted to), and the American fundamentalist brigade and the "medocracy" would have a field-day in an effort to ban the stuff if snus was viewed by the public as some sort of incredibly-high-potency nicotine drug.
In any case, a nicotine buzz is not much of a selling point in any tobacco product. A nicotine buzz only lasts about a minute, and it is not why people even smoke cigarettes. Smoking (and snus) are about satiating a craving, not getting high. Most smokers (like me) will tell you that the wish they had never started, and we say this precisely BECAUSE there seems to be no point except to get a "fix" and satiate a strong urge to smoke. There is no "high" or altered state of significance as a selling point, like there is with, say, marijuana. This is why, it seems, marijuana smokers are much more content to be marijuana smokers than tobacco smokers are to be smokers.
By the way, I have on order, to be delivered tomorrow, the following: Goteborgs Prima Fint and Goteborgs Rape, Offroad Wintergreen, and Roda Lacket - all loose. Any ideas what to expect from these brands?
Cheers.
Comment