Originally posted by sgreger1
View Post
Question regarding Northerner and back taxes
Collapse
X
-
-
-
Originally posted by sgreger1 View PostLol i was just joking, incase that wasnt clear (suckers)
Either way, paypal isnt required by law to report to the state like tobacco retailers now are.
Paypal need not report, just as CC cos are not obligated...
the states just need to go after the actual suppliers.
btw, a new snus poster?
Comment
-
-
the law is not reto active. if the gov wants to see sales before a law is in effect to require them to be sent to the gov, the law would need a warrant or subpoena. Subpoenas are normally not given in a blanket manner, iow "send me all your customers names who have not paid taxes"=no. "Send me "Joe Blow's" buying records because we are making a case on him for something"=yes. If the shop is in another country just bringing up the subject is a joke, it ain't happening. now, here is the everyday, general way this works......... it ain't happening, not with our current laws and ways of tracking taxes. do you think ***** snus shop wants to turn you in for not paying your snus tax? oh sure, lets turn in our customers, we will lose them right away and the rest will quit us within a few days after they hear about what we did. but hey, i am sure you paid your snus taxes just like i did so we have nothing to worry about anyway
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by SnusoMatic View Postdo you think ***** snus shop wants to turn you in for not paying your snus tax? oh sure, lets turn in our customers, we will lose them right away and the rest will quit us within a few days after they hear about what we did.
PACT requires 4 years of records to be collected and available, presumably with collection beginning on 29 June. What's the chance that the programmer is told, "we need a report that shows the last 4 years of orders" and writes this as "today - 4 years" when they write the query?
Also, your subpoena example has happened (more or less - lawsuits to get the customer lists) in MA several times already at online smoke shops.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by danielan View PostI'd worry less about malice then I would bad requirements leading to improper reporting.
PACT requires 4 years of records to be collected and available, presumably with collection beginning on 29 June. What's the chance that the programmer is told, "we need a report that shows the last 4 years of orders" and writes this as "today - 4 years" when they write the query?
Also, your subpoena example has happened (more or less - lawsuits to get the customer lists) in MA several times already at online smoke shops.
Do you have an example of a lawsuit? i very interested in such things. internet law is screwy and changes quick. i think as a free people internet law is going to be the death of a lot of liberty (in the true sense), freedom and privacy. not to mention the blurring of geographical jurisdiction. Anyway, i am interested.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by SnusoMatic View Postfed and state about $500 on a roll a week for four years. i just pay mine as i go and forget it.
Originally posted by SnusoMatic View PostDo you have an example of a lawsuit? i very interested in such things. internet law is screwy and changes quick. i think as a free people internet law is going to be the death of a lot of liberty (in the true sense), freedom and privacy. not to mention the blurring of geographical jurisdiction. Anyway, i am interested.
Comment
-
-
Just saw this article and it made me think of this thread, although it's not the exact same issue at play.
http://news.cnet.com/8301-13578_3-20009603-38.html
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by GoVegan View PostWhats up with Massachusetts? It doesn't sound like you can even go to the bathroom there without paying some kind of tax.
....shush...
we don't need to give our taxocrats any more ideas!!
There are already enough reasons why we're known as Taxachusetts.
Comment
-
-
The Pilgrims would never believe the shape we're in!!
Originally posted by tombanjoJust saw this article and it made me think of this thread, although it's not the exact same issue at play.
July 2, 2010 12:28 PM PDT
"Democrats push for new Internet sales taxes"
The halcyon days of tax-free Internet shopping will, if Rep. Bill Delahunt gets his way, soon be coming to an abrupt end.
Delahunt, a Massachusetts Democrat, introduced a bill on Thursday that would rewrite the ground rules for Internet and mail order sales by eliminating the option for many Americans to shop over the Internet without paying state sales taxes.
Delahunt's bill: the "Main Street Fairness Act"
Like I said...
we don't need to give our taxocrats any more ideas!!
when it comes to our hard-earned money...
News at 11..
(No sarcasm here ... just the cold, hard truth!!)
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by snusgetter View Post[ATTACH=CONFIG]418[/ATTACH]
....shush...
we don't need to give our [ATTACH=CONFIG]417[/ATTACH] taxocrats any more ideas!!
There are already enough reasons why we're known as Taxachusetts.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by GENERAL BILLY View PostAll Mass residents imagine a world where the government doesn't rob you every ten minutes, where your car isn't towed for no apparent reason, where flies, no matter there color don't bite you. Where you don't have to pay to get off of the T. Now get on 93 and head north and see the promise the world can hold.
(now I sound like a Floridian!)
........................
.................LIVE FREE OR DIE --- Good words to live by!
Comment
-
Comment